Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
BocaJack wrote:
So why would you install a macerator if you don't plan to dump the tank at sea? Or do you think a whole tankful is better for the environment than a single flush? I don't want to install a macerator. I am considering a new, simpler, and easier to maintain head arrangement that would include 1) manual freshwater flushing, 2) no macerator, 3) no Y valve, 4) Lavac or Skipper toilet, 5) just a freshwater intake, a vent, and a deck pump-out, and 6) high-quality hoses. I am thinking about ordering a new Valiant 42. This set-up would eliminate two holes in the boat, right? And, this would seem to be a higher quality alternative to what you recommended a few strings up: a permantent porta-potti with pump-out feature. Simple and easy to maintain. Just getting some ideas here. Thanks! How would you empty the tank at sea? With this arrangement it seems like your cruising range and locations would be rather limited as you'd be virtually tethered to marinas with pumpout facilities. --Alan Gomes |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
For Peggie: conversion of a Jabsco 37010 Series electric toilets to "Quiet - Flush" | Cruising | |||
Lavac Heads | Cruising | |||
LaVac and replacement | Cruising | |||
Lavac heads vs. others | Cruising |