Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Peter Wiley wrote: In article .com, wrote: Well your source for information is obviously way out of date because SeaDoo hasn't made the GTX RFI in a few years. Here's Seadoo's marketing blurb for their current flagship model on the CURRENT web site: "Roughing it is relative on the GTX and GTX SC. Packed with two powerful engine options, luxury to spare and smooth maneuverability. A top-notch boat that takes riding to a new place. Like your favorite camping spot. Or a little island hopping." Here's their description of another model: "If the journey is the reward, you may never reach your destination. Thanks to the uncompromising luxury of the 2006 GTX Limited. With a 215 HP engine, 215 f*****g HORSEPOWER? For *ONE* or *TWO* people on a goddam toy? My 6.5 tonne workboat only has 2 225 HP turbo diesel engines driving Hamilton jets, and it'll do in excess of 40 knots unladen! Thanks for that, you've confirmed my opinion. Those damn things should be banned from all public waterways. Far too much HP for any rational purpose. Makes sense! Let's ban 'em all because PDW says it's too much horsepower! What is the cut-off for an acceptable level of power, and who will be the arbiter of what qualifies as a "rational purpose"? Well, PDW, of course! And again - very important - your analysis here fails on one very important point: we're talking about boats, not toys! It's when anybody thinks or treats pwc's as toys, I suspect, that most of the conflicts and problems arise! (Operating them without knowing what they're doing, etc.) richforman PDW |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|