Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In another overly long thread about the merits of the C&C33, someone
mentioned rigging as a potential issue in an older boat. Would anyone care to share experience with assessing the condition of rigging on a freshwater-only sailboat? Look-fors? Tips? Sources of information? Cheers and Happy 2006! --only 16 weeks till launch day-- |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
prodigal1 wrote:
In another overly long thread about the merits of the C&C33, someone mentioned rigging as a potential issue in an older boat. Would anyone care to share experience with assessing the condition of rigging on a freshwater-only sailboat? Look-fors? Tips? Sources of information? Cheers and Happy 2006! --only 16 weeks till launch day-- Some insurers (most) will not insure a boat where the standing rigging is more than 8 years old, even if the boat had never been used since new. This is the position in the UK, US may be different. Makes no difference whether the rigging is wire or solid rod. Dennis. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"prodigal1" wrote in message
... In another overly long thread about the merits of the C&C33, someone mentioned rigging as a potential issue in an older boat. Would anyone care to share experience with assessing the condition of rigging on a freshwater-only sailboat? Look-fors? Tips? Sources of information? Cheers and Happy 2006! --only 16 weeks till launch day-- The same issues apply. Typically, out here in SF, you need to replace the rigging after 10 years one way or another. I would assume it's the same elsewhere, although with fresh water, you might be able to go a bit longer. I wouldn't risk it, however. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A Great Lakes surveyor who seemed pretty knowledgeable told us that
they never replace standing rigging out there unless some noticeable flaw is discovered. Our 1980 boat was out there from at least 1984 until we brought it to Maine last year and the rigging looks very good. I'll let you know if the mast falls down. -- Roger Long "Capt. JG" wrote in message ... "prodigal1" wrote in message ... In another overly long thread about the merits of the C&C33, someone mentioned rigging as a potential issue in an older boat. Would anyone care to share experience with assessing the condition of rigging on a freshwater-only sailboat? Look-fors? Tips? Sources of information? Cheers and Happy 2006! --only 16 weeks till launch day-- The same issues apply. Typically, out here in SF, you need to replace the rigging after 10 years one way or another. I would assume it's the same elsewhere, although with fresh water, you might be able to go a bit longer. I wouldn't risk it, however. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That sounds scary. If you wait until there's an obvious flaw, you're sailing
on thin ice IMHO. The riggers out here say just the opposite... every ten years is about right. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Roger Long" wrote in message ... A Great Lakes surveyor who seemed pretty knowledgeable told us that they never replace standing rigging out there unless some noticeable flaw is discovered. Our 1980 boat was out there from at least 1984 until we brought it to Maine last year and the rigging looks very good. I'll let you know if the mast falls down. -- Roger Long "Capt. JG" wrote in message ... "prodigal1" wrote in message ... In another overly long thread about the merits of the C&C33, someone mentioned rigging as a potential issue in an older boat. Would anyone care to share experience with assessing the condition of rigging on a freshwater-only sailboat? Look-fors? Tips? Sources of information? Cheers and Happy 2006! --only 16 weeks till launch day-- The same issues apply. Typically, out here in SF, you need to replace the rigging after 10 years one way or another. I would assume it's the same elsewhere, although with fresh water, you might be able to go a bit longer. I wouldn't risk it, however. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would certainly agree with 10 years in salt water although very few
people actually do. I can't remember seeing or hearing of a dismasted coastal cruiser. Any Great Lakes or other fresh water owners have recommendations or dismastings to report? -- Roger Long "Capt. JG" wrote in message ... That sounds scary. If you wait until there's an obvious flaw, you're sailing on thin ice IMHO. The riggers out here say just the opposite... every ten years is about right. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Roger Long" wrote in message ... A Great Lakes surveyor who seemed pretty knowledgeable told us that they never replace standing rigging out there unless some noticeable flaw is discovered. Our 1980 boat was out there from at least 1984 until we brought it to Maine last year and the rigging looks very good. I'll let you know if the mast falls down. -- Roger Long "Capt. JG" wrote in message ... "prodigal1" wrote in message ... In another overly long thread about the merits of the C&C33, someone mentioned rigging as a potential issue in an older boat. Would anyone care to share experience with assessing the condition of rigging on a freshwater-only sailboat? Look-fors? Tips? Sources of information? Cheers and Happy 2006! --only 16 weeks till launch day-- The same issues apply. Typically, out here in SF, you need to replace the rigging after 10 years one way or another. I would assume it's the same elsewhere, although with fresh water, you might be able to go a bit longer. I wouldn't risk it, however. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 01 Jan 2006 11:29:13 -0500, prodigal1 wrote:
In another overly long thread about the merits of the C&C33, someone mentioned rigging as a potential issue in an older boat. Would anyone care to share experience with assessing the condition of rigging on a freshwater-only sailboat? Look-fors? Tips? Sources of information? Cheers and Happy 2006! --only 16 weeks till launch day-- There's the obvious eyeball "tests" of looking for cracks, rust weeping, deformation of holes, fraying wire, terminals with suspiciously shiny wire, etc. There's the dye tests. Interpreting those is a rigger's art. There's the X-ray tests. Even more so. I have 1/4" original (33 years) 7 x 19 standing rigging all around in freshwater with good quality Merriman open turnbuckles which I inspect and lube yearly. I eyeball the entire spar before launch, paying particular attention to cotter pins, tangs, etc. My insurance company isn't making a fuss, and the boat passes survey requirements. I also inspect the chainplates and have replaced two bolts there in six years. I can see a day when that job will have to be attended to: there's a slight deformation in the hole in one plate...but I don't race it and I reef early. Even so, common sense and a sort of learned conservatism would say that I should replace the lot (except the heavy and undamaged mast) in the next five or less years. Certainly, the desire to have new sheaves and to go to new all-rope halyards is part of that. At that time, I will likely replace ALL chainplates, which is a big, nasty job, but it will allow me to service and maybe reglass and retab all the structural elements tying the plates to the hull. Brion Toss's "Rigger's Companion" is great on all this stuff, or buy a surveyor a few beers. R. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No idea about reports... not my sailing area.
Out here, dismastings are not that uncommon. For example, we had a Catalina 27 that dismasted due to an almost invisible crack in a turnbuckle. I missed it, our maintenance guy missed it (and he was really looking), and the rigger missed it about six months before the rig went over. Fortunately, no one was hurt and the insurance worked. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Roger Long" wrote in message ... I would certainly agree with 10 years in salt water although very few people actually do. I can't remember seeing or hearing of a dismasted coastal cruiser. Any Great Lakes or other fresh water owners have recommendations or dismastings to report? -- Roger Long "Capt. JG" wrote in message ... That sounds scary. If you wait until there's an obvious flaw, you're sailing on thin ice IMHO. The riggers out here say just the opposite... every ten years is about right. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Roger Long" wrote in message ... A Great Lakes surveyor who seemed pretty knowledgeable told us that they never replace standing rigging out there unless some noticeable flaw is discovered. Our 1980 boat was out there from at least 1984 until we brought it to Maine last year and the rigging looks very good. I'll let you know if the mast falls down. -- Roger Long "Capt. JG" wrote in message ... "prodigal1" wrote in message ... In another overly long thread about the merits of the C&C33, someone mentioned rigging as a potential issue in an older boat. Would anyone care to share experience with assessing the condition of rigging on a freshwater-only sailboat? Look-fors? Tips? Sources of information? Cheers and Happy 2006! --only 16 weeks till launch day-- The same issues apply. Typically, out here in SF, you need to replace the rigging after 10 years one way or another. I would assume it's the same elsewhere, although with fresh water, you might be able to go a bit longer. I wouldn't risk it, however. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would certainly agree with 10 years in salt water although very few
people actually do. I can't remember seeing or hearing of a dismasted coastal cruiser. I know of a couple, and one of them belonged to me. The exact cause was never determined but the rigging was in fact older than 10 years, close to 20 in fact. I would suggest inspection by a professional rigger every couple of years. Dismastings are no fun and it will definitely take a chunk of time out of your sailing season. Insurance companies also have a bad habit of trying to find reasons for not covering the loss. |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'll second that... we got the money, but it was not an experience I would
like to duplicate. I can see their perspective, however. We did need to prove it was not really a maintenance issue. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com wrote in message ups.com... I would certainly agree with 10 years in salt water although very few people actually do. I can't remember seeing or hearing of a dismasted coastal cruiser. I know of a couple, and one of them belonged to me. The exact cause was never determined but the rigging was in fact older than 10 years, close to 20 in fact. I would suggest inspection by a professional rigger every couple of years. Dismastings are no fun and it will definitely take a chunk of time out of your sailing season. Insurance companies also have a bad habit of trying to find reasons for not covering the loss. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|