![]() |
Jet Ski overheating problem
The_Giz wrote:
Soooo skipper... have a nice sail. But you know.. the next time you find yourself being annoyed by powerboaters and/or PWC's...... just stop and think for a second. Maybe, just maybe these BOATERS are annoying you simply because you're an ASS. Around here it usually means the powerboater left it on autopilot while he went to take a leak, and then he stopped for a beer. |
Jet Ski overheating problem
Everybody on the Internet is a member of Mensa.
I don't know about that - I'm not, didn't keep up the dues because I wasn't really getting much out of it - didn't need to join another club and go to meetings and events because my life is already pretty full with the day job, wife, kids, working weekends as a musician, and boating. But I was a member for a year or two, just a few years back; I just took the entrance test out of curiosity and pride (egotism I guess), was pretty sure I'd get in and I did. Then I found out that I didn't even need to take the test, could have gotten in just by showing my SAT results, also in the top 2% percentile of the population....not to brag or anything, but someone in the post earlier questioned my intelligence, and believe me, it's not in question. richforman |
Jet Ski overheating problem
In article ,
The_Giz wrote: "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message ... After all... we're all BOATERS... and it's the right thing to do. We are. You guys are just another hazard on the water. Well Jonathan.... I'm sorry you feel that way. It's a childish and immature attitude, but it's yours to have. No, it's not. EVERYTHING on the water is a potential hazard. If you think otherwise, then you're the one with the problem. But think what you may, by every classification except yours, we are boaters. No. EVERYTHING ON THE WATER YOU DUNCE! atrocity.... and I'll wager a small bet that you absolutely think that my pleasure cruiser is an abomination.... and that my ski boat just absolutely sucks because it doesn't sport a sail and can't perform the duties that you Not at all. Neither in fact. It's typically the people on them that are the abomination. You are a member of the (thankfully) small group of boaters that really doesn't deserve to be accommodated by the others on what is absolutely a Bwahahaha.. well, you told me off didn't you! Soooo skipper... have a nice sail. But you know.. the next time you find yourself being annoyed by powerboaters and/or PWC's...... just stop and think for a second. Maybe, just maybe these BOATERS are annoying you simply because you're an ASS. I did think that once, then I came to my senses!! -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
Jet Ski overheating problem
In article ,
The_Giz wrote: No, no, no, no no...... sigh Ya see.... there's part of the problem. You need to isolate the actions and attitudes of the individual from those of the *group*. It's not the "powerboaters" mentality..... It's *MY* mentality. It's all mine. I own it. And I won't share. And it's not directed at "sailboaters". It's exclusively directed at Jonathan. It's all his. And he earned it. And God knows, we all know... he won't share either. Be quiet Scotty, I EARNED IT! -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
Jet Ski overheating problem
Well Jonathan.... I'm sorry you feel that way. It's a childish and immature attitude, but it's yours to have. No, it's not. EVERYTHING on the water is a potential hazard. If you think otherwise, then you're the one with the problem. Ahhh... so now we've gone from being a HAZARD to being a *potential* hazard. I see a huge difference between the two (potential murderer... murder.... shrug)... but to you I'm sure it's just minutia. The DUNCE |
Jet Ski overheating problem
Terry,
Very well said, but save your bandwidth. (Teaching a pig to sing and such.) Billy believes he was the right(maybe the requirement) to take any vessel anywhere close aboard at flank speed. He is convinced that, if a vessel has any machinery onboard, it does not qualify as a vessel undersail regardless of the situation. He has proven he is not capable of interpreting Colregs the same way as the OMI to whom I wrote the pages of my license examinations. I just wish he had said where he is so we could all avoid him. Matt Colie - See prior sigs - I'm tired of this. Terry Spragg wrote: at least it was on topic! NI! Terry K Bill McKee wrote: Was on topic, but sailboats can not turn as wanted, the rest of the world be damned. Bill McKee wrote: Throttle off, no control, turning radius about a boat length. Well, if you put it that way, it sounds like it should be right, and logically, it is exactly correct, and if you read what you wrote, you may see why it is so funny, that you bite your own tail. Sailboats can not just turn, (or not turn,) as wanted. They are overpowered by the wind all the time. The wind blows sailboats around like leaves sometimes. As a mariner, you are expected to understand that, anticipate it, and survive the hazards anyway. Overtaking vessels must keep clear, sail or power. If they cannot, they must slow down to a safe speed, even stop. Chewy beans. You are expected and required to understand sail and power, and all their constraints, or stay home. Sailboats flop about out of control from time to time, motor on or off, whenever the sails are up and the wind is alive, it is the nature of the game: 15 HP auxiliary engines, thousand HP wild winds, waves, sails, ropes, winches, flying fish, nature, etc, etc. You understand, don't you? If not, you should not be in command on the water. What you don't seem to grasp is that no one except possibly you, would purposely hit someone with a car or boat, just because they were ****ed off and somehow surmise that they are in the right, have the right of way, and therefore, have a license to kill anyone who does not stay out of your way, regardless. This attitude you seemingly cherish may well cause you to spend the latter years of your life locked in a cell being raped by real nasty *******s with really big muscles and real nasty diseases. On the evidence you provide, I would bet two cents you are prettier than you are smart. On the water, all the regulations in the world are there to settle lawsuits after damages occur, and to impress on mariners that collisions are to be avoided by any means, at all costs, regardless of the causes. The reason why should be obvious. A collision at sea can ruin your whole life. Like being bitten by a dog, it can change your attitude forever, the hard way. Don't feel too bad, even real sea captains sometimes hit other ships, and blow cities like Halifax all to hell, because they make little mistakes early on, and suddenly find they cannot avoid the other guy's similar idiocy. We are all human, right? 'Course, those arrogant guys usually end up losing their nice cushy seat at the Captain's table, and deservedly so. Some commit suicide once their role in disaster becomes obvious. These men have consciences, at least. Some of their very cushy seats disappear below the titanic icy waves as they sit in them, along with thousands of their passengers. Icebergs and the wind just don't care. It is left to us to be responsible, considerate, cautious and courteous. Some grow up earlier than others. Some never make it. Fair winds to you, and the best of luck, for all our sakes. Your skills, knowledge and attitude probably won't help you, your passengers, or locals much. Old sailors would treat you like a rock awash, if you would just keep still. Otherwise, we fear for you. Terry K |
Jet Ski overheating problem
You are a hazard. Jet-skis are potential hazards.
Clar? -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "The_Giz" wrote in message ... Well Jonathan.... I'm sorry you feel that way. It's a childish and immature attitude, but it's yours to have. No, it's not. EVERYTHING on the water is a potential hazard. If you think otherwise, then you're the one with the problem. Ahhh... so now we've gone from being a HAZARD to being a *potential* hazard. I see a huge difference between the two (potential murderer... murder.... shrug)... but to you I'm sure it's just minutia. The DUNCE |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"Matt Colie" wrote in message ... Terry, Very well said, but save your bandwidth. (Teaching a pig to sing and such.) Billy believes he was the right(maybe the requirement) to take any vessel anywhere close aboard at flank speed. He is convinced that, if a vessel has any machinery onboard, it does not qualify as a vessel undersail regardless of the situation. He has proven he is not capable of interpreting Colregs the same way as the OMI to whom I wrote the pages of my license examinations. I just wish he had said where he is so we could all avoid him. Matt Colie - See prior sigs - I'm tired of this. Terry Spragg wrote: at least it was on topic! NI! Terry K Bill McKee wrote: Was on topic, but sailboats can not turn as wanted, the rest of the world be damned. Bill McKee wrote: Throttle off, no control, turning radius about a boat length. Well, if you put it that way, it sounds like it should be right, and logically, it is exactly correct, and if you read what you wrote, you may see why it is so funny, that you bite your own tail. Sailboats can not just turn, (or not turn,) as wanted. They are overpowered by the wind all the time. The wind blows sailboats around like leaves sometimes. As a mariner, you are expected to understand that, anticipate it, and survive the hazards anyway. Overtaking vessels must keep clear, sail or power. If they cannot, they must slow down to a safe speed, even stop. Chewy beans. You are expected and required to understand sail and power, and all their constraints, or stay home. Sailboats flop about out of control from time to time, motor on or off, whenever the sails are up and the wind is alive, it is the nature of the game: 15 HP auxiliary engines, thousand HP wild winds, waves, sails, ropes, winches, flying fish, nature, etc, etc. You understand, don't you? If not, you should not be in command on the water. What you don't seem to grasp is that no one except possibly you, would purposely hit someone with a car or boat, just because they were ****ed off and somehow surmise that they are in the right, have the right of way, and therefore, have a license to kill anyone who does not stay out of your way, regardless. This attitude you seemingly cherish may well cause you to spend the latter years of your life locked in a cell being raped by real nasty *******s with really big muscles and real nasty diseases. On the evidence you provide, I would bet two cents you are prettier than you are smart. On the water, all the regulations in the world are there to settle lawsuits after damages occur, and to impress on mariners that collisions are to be avoided by any means, at all costs, regardless of the causes. The reason why should be obvious. A collision at sea can ruin your whole life. Like being bitten by a dog, it can change your attitude forever, the hard way. Don't feel too bad, even real sea captains sometimes hit other ships, and blow cities like Halifax all to hell, because they make little mistakes early on, and suddenly find they cannot avoid the other guy's similar idiocy. We are all human, right? 'Course, those arrogant guys usually end up losing their nice cushy seat at the Captain's table, and deservedly so. Some commit suicide once their role in disaster becomes obvious. These men have consciences, at least. Some of their very cushy seats disappear below the titanic icy waves as they sit in them, along with thousands of their passengers. Icebergs and the wind just don't care. It is left to us to be responsible, considerate, cautious and courteous. Some grow up earlier than others. Some never make it. Fair winds to you, and the best of luck, for all our sakes. Your skills, knowledge and attitude probably won't help you, your passengers, or locals much. Old sailors would treat you like a rock awash, if you would just keep still. Otherwise, we fear for you. Terry K Bite Me. propulsion motor on, equal power boat. |
Jet Ski overheating problem
You are a hazard. Jet-skis are potential hazards. Clar? -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com As are you in your sailboat. Care to argue that point? Giz |
Jet Ski overheating problem
Bill McKee wrote:
"Matt Colie" wrote in message Billy believes he was the right(maybe the requirement) to take any vessel anywhere close aboard at flank speed. He is convinced that, if a vessel has any machinery onboard, it does not qualify as a vessel undersail regardless of the situation. He has proven he is not capable of interpreting Colregs the same way as the OMI to whom I wrote the pages of my license examinations. I just wish he had said where he is so we could all avoid him. Bite Me. propulsion motor on, equal power boat. But, that's not what the rules actually say. They are quite explicit, the propulsion machinery must be used. A sailboat warming up its engine, or running it to charge batteries, is still a sailboat. OTOH, if they failed to use it to avoid a collision, they'd have some explaining to do. But that's the case whether or not it was running. Further, the sailboat's responsibilities are its concern. It's your responsibility to treat a vessel that looks like a sailboat as a sailboat. That includes not passing within 15 feet at 25 mph. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:27 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com