Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
As you might have read in another posting of mine, 4-strokes give better fuel economy
than 2-strokes because the low speed jet on a 4-stroke is very small and only allows the minimal required fuel through it. The down side, as I mentioned before, is that this tiny jet is more subject to clogging. This latter problem can be overcome by proper maintenance, which includes not leaving gas sit for long periods in the carburator. Certainly all the newer gasolines with additives don't help. Yamaha recommends not using gasohol, but it's almost impossible to avoid it. Sherwin D. wrote: Another thread concerning a 9.9 hp got me wondering what to use to power a boat I will build. It needs to be up to 75 hp. Does a 4 stroke really give noticeable increase in mpg? Are 4 strokes really finicky compared to 2 strokes (I mean reliability). |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
What does MIT say about ionization and lightning?? | ASA | |||
Paddling straight? | Touring | |||
Why Ficht failed & why 2stroke OBs are thankfully gone (almost:-)) | General | |||
2004 9.9 Mercury - 2 stroke or 4 stroke? | General | |||
2 stroke vs. 4 stroke?? | General |