"*JimH*" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...


Yet you claim sufficient knowledge to be able to dismiss both Larry's
malicious slam and the general description of the layup process on the
non- Sea Ray site as equally misleading. Once you got past the false
notion that I was using one of my own articles to support my argument,
you then claimed the truth is "somewhere in between."

Once again, why not allow the group the benefit of your detailed and
precise knowledge about Sea Ray layup? Just exactly *where*, in
between, does the "truth" fall? Surely you must know, or you wouldn't
presume to make such a statement.

It's amazing that you choose to believe that a company responsible for
supplying robotics to Sea Ray wouldn't be able to accurately describe
how those robots function and what they do.
Oh well. You're entitled to your opinion and conjecture.


Here are the various lamination schedules of Four Winns, a middle of the
road production boat:
http://www.fourwinns.com/lamination.cfm

SeaRay does not offer this information on their website.

What is the layup schedule of the SeaRay boat you gave a fluff review on
Chuck? You should know after your *detailed* review of the boat and the
company.




Silence.

Newsgroup Reader wrote:
The fact that Gould uses the robot
manufacturer as his source of technical info concerning the fiberglass
lamination schedule amazes me. Especially since the web site does not
discuss anything concerning a fiberglass lamination schedule.


Wow. Are you ever confused. I *never* said I was providing a detailed
layup schedule, only a link to a site that detailed how (as in the
general technique) the boats are laid up.

Tell us, please, where "in the middle" between Pascoe's assertion that
Sea Ray boats aren't really fibergalss at all, but made of "putty"
instead and the photos of a Sea Ray hull being constructed from chopped
strand doed the "truth" reside? Why do you now concentrte on personal
attacks rather than come forward with this information you claim to
possess?

I guess the answer is obvious, isn't it?

Gould,
I have not made any person attacks, that seems to be your bailiwick
wrote in message
ups.com...


Newsgroup Reader wrote:
The fact that Gould uses the robot
manufacturer as his source of technical info concerning the fiberglass
lamination schedule amazes me. Especially since the web site does not
discuss anything concerning a fiberglass lamination schedule.


Wow. Are you ever confused. I *never* said I was providing a detailed
layup schedule, only a link to a site that detailed how (as in the
general technique) the boats are laid up.

Tell us, please, where "in the middle" between Pascoe's assertion that
Sea Ray boats aren't really fibergalss at all, but made of "putty"
instead and the photos of a Sea Ray hull being constructed from chopped
strand doed the "truth" reside? Why do you now concentrte on personal
attacks rather than come forward with this information you claim to
possess?

I guess the answer is obvious, isn't it?