Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 05 Apr 2005 12:02:39 -0400, Rodney Myrvaagnes
wrote: On Tue, 05 Apr 2005 03:24:46 GMT, Brian Whatcott wrote: On Mon, 04 Apr 2005 23:12:53 -0400, DSK wrote: Michael wrote: Think "balanced" vs "unbalanced" rudders....power steering vs manual. The balance area of a rudder reduces the perceived load on the helm, but does *not* reduce the load on the rudder post. /// Fresh Breezes-- Doug King Hmmm...seems to me that the steering torque on a rudder can be reduced, zeroed or reversed - depending on the balance area fraction selected. The rule of thumb, I seem to recall is 25% area forward for minimal torque - more than that and the torque is reversed, giving unpleasant positive feedback effect. Sure, but the topic was rudder bearings. They don't get loade by torque, but by radial loads from lift generated by the rudder. Rodney Myrvaagnes NYC J36 Gjo/a Yes, you're right of course. And this was Doug's point, I think. Brian W Altus, OK |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Sailboat as powered cruiser? | General | |||
??? | General | |||
WHY SAILBOATS ARE BETTER THAN WOMEN | ASA | |||
WHY SAILBOATS ARE BETTER THAN WOMEN | General | |||
Repost - this is so good it deserves to be read more than once | ASA |