Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 14:26:51 -0400, DSK wrote:
All were "big nut" thru-hulls with gate valves. I replaced them with brass NPT ball valves, which I service yearly and I have double SS clamps everywhere. No problems whatsoever. If I were in salt water, I would act differently. Why? Do boats not sink in fresh water or something ![]() Sure they do, but sal****er eventually dissolves brass fittings, meaning they are a no-no in even brackish water.. "Proper" seacocks are salt-resistant bronze, or these days, Marelon. In fresh water, you can use brass plumbing ball valves...at about 1/4-1/8 the price of bronze. The actual thru-hulls are still bronze: it's the cocks screwed onto them that are brass, with teflon tape and thread sealer between. The issue is less of gate valve vs ball valve, than it is NPT vs flange and one of corrosion. Nowadays common cheapo hardware store grade valves are far more corrosion resistant than anything from years ago (except possibly the super-expensive Monel sea cocks, which I've seen exactly once in a lifetime). A sea cock should (in theory) be supported by a flange, not just screwed onto a protruding pipe. There are lots of ways... including just plain heeling... that the pipe & valve come under strain. Still, with modern materials and good attention to detail (btw it is possible to overtighten NPT connections & split the casting or collapse the pipe wall) it should be just fine. I have been careful with the hoses and whatnot to avoid lateral forces. I suppose if the engine came loose and slammed into the ball valve at speed, I'd be in trouble, but that could easily tear a hole in the actual hull, meaning I have bigger issues. R. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Furuno Track Ball sticks | Electronics | |||
Sea Cocks | Cruising | |||
Bush drops the ball | ASA | |||
PVC valves on a seachest/manifold? | Boat Building | |||
Through Hulls, Peggie Hall | Cruising |