Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Skip Gundlach" skipgundlach sez use my name at earthlink dot fishcatcher (net) - with apologies for the spamtrap wrote in message ... Hi, Y'all... Well... "Larry W4CSC" wrote in message ... snipped bit was here Hmm...5A from a big solar panel or 15A from a wind generator = 5X12hrs=60AH per day if the sun shines or 360AH wind power in a full gale 24/7. Not much of a real powerhouse, is it, huge batteries or small batteries... Plan on using the big alternator on the engine every day in this configuration. Hm. Help me with the math. As a lapsed math, physics and chem major, I don't remember my stuff all that well. However, I'll have right in the neighborhood of 500W solar, and a KISS wind generator in the Caribbean. Various vendors suggest I take the wattage and divide by 3, or 4 if really lousy weather, for a reasonable typical AH input, daily. My math has that at 170-125AH/day, plus some other unknown - but apparently pretty substantial - AH from a KISS. Our anticipated daily budget is about 125AH; we'll have (for simplicity in this calculation) ~1250AH capacity. It's our presumption that we'll have 4-5 days capacity, in the most unimaginable (in the Caribbean) circumstance of continuous no wind or sun. Have I missed something here? Hi Skip, I'm looking at your math and trying to work out how you came up with 170-125AH/day generated by your solar panels. Will this 500 watt panel array ever actually put out 500watts? Or, as you said above, will it really be only a quarter to a third of this ? If so, how many hours a day will this panel put out this kind of wattage? Perhaps a couple of hours on either side of noon with diminished output before and after this time? 500 watt panel /14.5 volt supply = 35 amps of current. A third of this is only about 12 amps or so. For about 4 hours is 4 hours x 12 amps = 48 AH per day. Perhaps you will get some useful power out of the rest of the available daylight, perhaps another 22 AH or so, that still only gives you 60 AH per day or so, no? Which doesn't seem to come close to filling your anticipated daily power budget, let alone leave anything to replenish the batteries from the drawdown on cloudy days. Perhaps I've missed somthing here? More snipped bits Thanks. L8R Skip (about to head back to the boat for another couple weeks, this time, this part, of the refit) -- Morgan 461 #2 SV Flying Pig http://tinyurl.com/384p2 "There is nothing-absolutely nothing-half so much worth doing as simply messing about in boats. In or out of 'em, it doesn't matter. Nothing seems really to matter, that's the charm of it. Whether you get away, or whether you don't; whether you arrive at your destination or whether you reach somewhere else, or whether you never get anywhere at all, you're always busy, and you never do anything in particular; and when you've done it there's always something else to do, and you can do it if you like, but you'd much better not." -- Ken Heaton & Anne Tobin Cape Breton Island, Canada kenheaton AT ess wye dee DOT eastlink DOT ca |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ken Heaton" wrote in
news:xh05e.4996$VF5.1702@edtnps89: Will this 500 watt panel array ever actually put out 500watts? Another interesting point is that a solar cell is very poor efficiency. Here's a report on a new Sanyo HIT cell hitting 21.3%.... "The resulting efficiency level exceeds 21.3 percent, which until now, was the highest level delivered by SANYO HIT solar cells. The HIT solar cell is 10cm square, nearly the same size as solar cells currently used for home and industrial applications." Regular silicon solar cells are like 6% efficient! Even if we get this supercell technology, to get 500 watts out, we're going to have to put 2500 watts of sunshine in and cool the cells of 2000 watts of heat! Will that be fresh water or seawater cooling??...(c; Maybe we can use the heat to cook lunch on the metal heat sinks...saving the drain from the microwave oven! Wonder why we can't run a little water pump in the loop to the water heater? The waste heat from the solar charging could give us all HOT SHOWERS AND DISHWATER! The big panel on Lionheart puts out 5A on its best day and only if the boom is out wide and not shading anything on top of the cockpit hardtop it covers.... |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi, Y'all,
I'm getting a little out of my depth, my last physics classes having been nearly 40 years ago, but... "Ken Heaton" wrote in message news:xh05e.4996$VF5.1702@edtnps89... Hi Skip, I'm looking at your math and trying to work out how you came up with 170-125AH/day generated by your solar panels. I'm not so much doing that as passing on the conventional and experienced (that is, by folks who have SPs installed) wisdom that one may take the wattage of current technology solar panels and divide by 3 (typical) to 4 (cloudy, etc.) for a real-world daily AH result. Not having same installed on our boat (where there will be minimal or no shading), I can't do more than speculate. Will this 500 watt panel array ever actually put out 500watts? Or, as you said above, will it really be only a quarter to a third of this ? If so, how many hours a day will this panel put out this kind of wattage? Perhaps a couple of hours on either side of noon with diminished output before and after this time? 500 watt panel /14.5 volt supply = 35 amps of current. Ah - but I'm going with the higher voltages, for a couple of reasons. One is easier transmission - smaller wires - for the same voltage drop. The other is for more flexibility when tied to an MPPT. Typical peak voltage would be in the 30s. So, presumably, at least, more amps result. A third of this is only about 12 amps or so. For about 4 hours is 4 hours x 12 amps = 48 AH per day. Perhaps you will get some useful power out of the rest of the available daylight, perhaps another 22 AH or so, that still only gives you 60 AH per day or so, no? Which doesn't seem to come close to filling your anticipated daily power budget, let alone leave anything to replenish the batteries from the drawdown on cloudy days. Agreed. However, that (your scenario above) would make for a very small output. I believe the 3 or 4 divider isn't at any given minute - else, why would they be rated at any given wattage? - but, rather, a full-day experience, ameliorated by darkness, clouds, shadows, and other impedimentia to a 24-hour, full output, result. Perhaps I've missed somthing here? I dunno - perhaps *I've* missed something in all the research I've done. I could swear that various posters to these fora have provided real-world experiences on which I base my assumptions, backed up by various vendor claims (as taken with the requisite grain of salt). That I'll be in the Caribbean has got to help, too, but it's not the presumption with which I started. L8R Skip, home for a couple more days before - this time - a 4 week working visit to the boat-on-the-hard -- Morgan 461 #2 SV Flying Pig http://tinyurl.com/384p2 "And then again, when you sit at the helm of your little ship on a clear night, and gaze at the countless stars overhead, and realize that you are quite alone on a wide, empty sea, it is apt to occur to you that in the general scheme of things you are merely an insignificant speck on the surface of the ocean; and are not nearly so important or as self-sufficient as you thought you were. Which is an exceedingly wholesome thought, and one that may effect a permanent change in your deportment that will be greatly appreciated by your friends."- James S. Pitkin |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
My 0.0002, could be wrong..
I have a 160 watt panel and when the sun is shining and the panel is aimed right, and Im using an MPPT controller, Im getting reasonably close to 160 watts out of it - like maybe 150.. What Ive seen are calcutions based on the rated power of the PV panel and assuing that you get 5 hours of sunlight per day. On good sunny days, this possibly underestimates the power. On cloudy days, you might get a lot less. Using current to compare things is ok but it doesnt take into account voltage. What really is important is power. Here are some rough calcs.. At 450 watts PV power and assuming using MPPT (which works and improves efficiency for either 12 or 24 volt systems), the output current at full power is (power = voltage * current) 15 amps for 24 volts system (15 = 450/30 volts - assumes MPPT allows panel to operate at 30 volts rather than battery voltage) 30 amps for 12 volts system (30 = 450/15 volts - assumes MPPT allows panel to operate at 15 volts) So if this current were available for an average of 5 hours per day, you would have 12 volts system : 5hours * 30 amps = 150 amp hours 24 volt system: 5 hours * 15 amps = 75 amp hours Note that the amp hours is different but the power is the same - which is why you should really look at watt hours and not amp hours to see what capacity is. The watt hours is then: 12 volt system: 5 hours * 30 amps * 12.5 volts = 1875 watt hours 24 volts system: 5 hours * 15 amps * 25 volts = 1875 watt hours To consider what long wire runs do, a lot of PV runs use 10 guage wire which has an impedance of "about" .00118 ohms per foot. So if you had for exampe 40 foot of wire between the PV array and the battery, the resistance which disipates power would be the combination of the two wires (ie, the total wire length is 80 foot) so the power disipating resistance of the wire is 2 * 40 foot * .00118 ohms/ft = .0944 ohms. So the power lost by the long wires would be ( power = current**2 * R) 12 volt system: 30**2 * .0944 ohms = 84.96 watts 24 volt system: 15**2 * .0944 ohms = 21.24 watts For long wires and higher current, the 24 volts system looks a fair amount better to me. You would be loosing nearly 20% just by the wire if you used 12 volts with this system. MPPT will help and I think a good application here but I personally dont think MPPT is about 12 or 24 volts - its about better utilizing either voltage system. I could be wrong or have bad calculation so dont take any of this seriously (and Im sure someone can find something wrong with it..) Wally Hall Denver Skip Gundlach wrote: Hi, Y'all, I'm getting a little out of my depth, my last physics classes having been nearly 40 years ago, but... "Ken Heaton" wrote in message news:xh05e.4996$VF5.1702@edtnps89... Hi Skip, I'm looking at your math and trying to work out how you came up with 170-125AH/day generated by your solar panels. I'm not so much doing that as passing on the conventional and experienced (that is, by folks who have SPs installed) wisdom that one may take the wattage of current technology solar panels and divide by 3 (typical) to 4 (cloudy, etc.) for a real-world daily AH result. Not having same installed on our boat (where there will be minimal or no shading), I can't do more than speculate. Will this 500 watt panel array ever actually put out 500watts? Or, as you said above, will it really be only a quarter to a third of this ? If so, how many hours a day will this panel put out this kind of wattage? Perhaps a couple of hours on either side of noon with diminished output before and after this time? 500 watt panel /14.5 volt supply = 35 amps of current. Ah - but I'm going with the higher voltages, for a couple of reasons. One is easier transmission - smaller wires - for the same voltage drop. The other is for more flexibility when tied to an MPPT. Typical peak voltage would be in the 30s. So, presumably, at least, more amps result. A third of this is only about 12 amps or so. For about 4 hours is 4 hours x 12 amps = 48 AH per day. Perhaps you will get some useful power out of the rest of the available daylight, perhaps another 22 AH or so, that still only gives you 60 AH per day or so, no? Which doesn't seem to come close to filling your anticipated daily power budget, let alone leave anything to replenish the batteries from the drawdown on cloudy days. Agreed. However, that (your scenario above) would make for a very small output. I believe the 3 or 4 divider isn't at any given minute - else, why would they be rated at any given wattage? - but, rather, a full-day experience, ameliorated by darkness, clouds, shadows, and other impedimentia to a 24-hour, full output, result. Perhaps I've missed somthing here? I dunno - perhaps *I've* missed something in all the research I've done. I could swear that various posters to these fora have provided real-world experiences on which I base my assumptions, backed up by various vendor claims (as taken with the requisite grain of salt). That I'll be in the Caribbean has got to help, too, but it's not the presumption with which I started. L8R Skip, home for a couple more days before - this time - a 4 week working visit to the boat-on-the-hard -- Morgan 461 #2 SV Flying Pig http://tinyurl.com/384p2 "And then again, when you sit at the helm of your little ship on a clear night, and gaze at the countless stars overhead, and realize that you are quite alone on a wide, empty sea, it is apt to occur to you that in the general scheme of things you are merely an insignificant speck on the surface of the ocean; and are not nearly so important or as self-sufficient as you thought you were. Which is an exceedingly wholesome thought, and one that may effect a permanent change in your deportment that will be greatly appreciated by your friends."- James S. Pitkin |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm sorry that I discovered this thread late in the discussion but
can you tell me what the "MPPT" you mention is? As I read your post this MPPT somehow increases the amount of power developed by the Solar Panels. Is this true? I ask this as my experience is that my experience has always been that solar panels developed (on a sunny day) approximately rated output watts/battery voltage when monitored using an amp gauge. If you have a system whereby the system outputs a higher voltage then the above mentioned formula allows then obviously the charging current will be higher as the internal resistance of the batteries is pretty much a constant for any given voltage and I would like that very much. Again I apologize for coming into this discussion late but if you know a way that allows me to develop a higher voltage then the usually calculated watts/resistance I certainly will incorporate it in my system. Thank you in advance for your information. On Sat, 09 Apr 2005 00:11:53 GMT, Walt wrote: My 0.0002, could be wrong.. I have a 160 watt panel and when the sun is shining and the panel is aimed right, and Im using an MPPT controller, Im getting reasonably close to 160 watts out of it - like maybe 150.. What Ive seen are calcutions based on the rated power of the PV panel and assuing that you get 5 hours of sunlight per day. On good sunny days, this possibly underestimates the power. On cloudy days, you might get a lot less. Using current to compare things is ok but it doesnt take into account voltage. What really is important is power. Here are some rough calcs.. At 450 watts PV power and assuming using MPPT (which works and improves efficiency for either 12 or 24 volt systems), the output current at full power is (power = voltage * current) 15 amps for 24 volts system (15 = 450/30 volts - assumes MPPT allows panel to operate at 30 volts rather than battery voltage) 30 amps for 12 volts system (30 = 450/15 volts - assumes MPPT allows panel to operate at 15 volts) Cheers, Anon (Bangkok, Thailand) |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article xh05e.4996$VF5.1702@edtnps89,
"Ken Heaton" wrote: Will this 500 watt panel array ever actually put out 500watts? Yes, it will, and for the first few years, more. 34 amps times 8 hours (and that's conservative) is 250 AH. Our little panel puts out its rated power from dawn to dusk if I realign it from time to time. -- Jere Lull Xan-a-Deux ('73 Tanzer 28 #4 out of Tolchester, MD) Xan's Pages: http://members.dca.net/jerelull/X-Main.html Our BVI FAQs (290+ pics) http://homepage.mac.com/jerelull/BVI/ |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the real life info Jere. I've been wondering the same things as
Skip, but I will be using a much smaller panel. And Anon had some good info on calculating power output. I'll have to go Google MPPT controllers now... -- Ken Heaton & Anne Tobin Cape Breton Island, Canada kenheaton AT ess wye dee DOT eastlink DOT ca "Jere Lull" wrote in message ... In article xh05e.4996$VF5.1702@edtnps89, "Ken Heaton" wrote: Will this 500 watt panel array ever actually put out 500watts? Yes, it will, and for the first few years, more. 34 amps times 8 hours (and that's conservative) is 250 AH. Our little panel puts out its rated power from dawn to dusk if I realign it from time to time. -- Jere Lull Xan-a-Deux ('73 Tanzer 28 #4 out of Tolchester, MD) Xan's Pages: http://members.dca.net/jerelull/X-Main.html Our BVI FAQs (290+ pics) http://homepage.mac.com/jerelull/BVI/ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
2005 West Marine catalog announed | General | |||
Just a few names... | General | |||
Essentials of a Marine Boat Alarm System | Electronics | |||
paradise cove trip | ASA | |||
The same people | ASA |