Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, the hole in this discussion is already there. The question is
how it get's plugged up. It's either going to get plugged up with fiberglass or with the existing bronze fitting designed for this critical service and mechanically locked into the fiberglass by the flange and nut. As someone who has been designing boats (including fiberglass ones) and figuring out how to keep the water out for over a quarter century, I'm in favor of the latter. If cost and time were not issues, and I wanted the inside and outside of the boat to look like nothing was ever there, I would have no qualms about a properly done fiberglass fill in. This is a case though where, as an engineering judgement, I think the easy way out is actually the most reliable by a small margin. I find it very interesting what a minority I seem to be on this (except for the single professional second opinion I've obtained). -- Roger Long "DSK" wrote in message .. . I don't understand how "reglassing is suspect." As for capping thru-hulls, one very rarely sees that and it leaves a vulnerable point. You might consider asking the ABYC. When it comes to holes in your hull, the "more is better" approach doesn't sound good. DSK |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Hull Design & Displacement Hulls | General | |||
Through hulls and seacocks | Cruising | |||
cored hulls | General | |||
Sanding plastic hulls | Touring | |||
Balsa core hulls & Sea Rays | General |