Marley wrote:
Proclamation Restricts Rights of Boats in US Waters

A Proclamation made by US President George W. Bush on February 26, 2004,
authorizes the Secretary of Homeland Security to take virtually total
control over any vessel, foreign or domestic, in the territorial waters
of the United States, if the authorities feel that vessel "may be used,
or is susceptible of being used, for voyage into Cuban territorial waters".

Translation: If the "authorities" believe for any reason that you are
THINKING about or are able to visit Cuba, you loose your boat. Yup...the
authorities are now MIND READERS. And once they read your mind they act
accordingly. I would venture to say that ANY boat is "susceptible of
being used to visit Cuba, wouldn't you?

Don't believe it? Here's it is striaght from the horses ass...err...mouth

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/relea...040226-11.html

Welcome to 1984 folks.



There's nothing at all wrong with this indeed it's exactly "why" the
people of the US re elected W with such a huge majority!!!

Just so you know; here downunder we've gone even further, "any" vessel
"intending" to enter our territorial waters (commercial 200 miles non
commercial 12miles) "must" give our national marine centre prior notice
of their intentions "before" they get within 1000 miles of the coast.

Needless to say some of the near (less than 1000 miles) neighbours got
a bit ****ed but so what??? there's no offense committed, so long as the
vessel notifies the marine centre who they are & what they're doing
before they set out for the coast.

Needless to say any boat turning up "unannounced" will be intercepted &
dealt with.

You really should grow up a bit, this genuinely is a winner takes all
war, the reason you don't fully understand is that your admin has
successfully protected you from further attacks since 911.

Instead of being critical you should be on your sad socialist knees
thanking them for the continued safety of you & your family.

K

The Krause lie of the day???

The liar Krause works for Ullico the union Co that tries to take
money from honest hard working unionists then direct it to "union"
decided projects, so this lie is him admitting how a union organisation
was actually funding a political campaign, illegal?? you ask, yeah me
too but hey we know how much he hates Bush. Ullico has a history in this
also as you'll see in subsequent Krause lies.


I'm doing my part to ease unemployment. I'm hiring another writer
for my staff. Will be putting the ad on MONSTER.COM and in the Wash Post.

I need more staff because 2004 is a major election year and business

booked to date indicates we'll be drowning in work. We need to hire a
production coordinator, too. It has very little to do with the state
of the
economy, other than using it as reason to defeat Republicrap candidates.


Is this just another Krause lie??? well probably like all the
others:-) but imagine if it's actually true???? Knowing that he has no
"business" of his own just as he has no boat of his own, but he works
for Ullico which is supposed to be a not for profit looking out for
genuine unionists?????



We have first-class benefits, including a top-of-the-line health
insurance plan, a non-contributory defined-benefit pension plan, a 401k,
and a life insurance policy equal to annual salary. We contribute a
share of profits to the 401k on behalf of the employee. Our employees
pay $4.50 for generic prescriptions and $8.00 for non-generics, but
that's going up next year to $10 and $15. New employees get two weeks
vacation the first year, and that goes to three weeks the third year. In
addition, we have 12 paid holidays and we shut down from noon on
Christmas eve to the day after New Year's Day. We also provide 20 days
of paid sick leave a year. And we have an outside company administering
pre-tax flexible bennies for our employees.
Our fringe benefit package follows the trade union model, except, of
course, for the profit contributions to 401k's. Trade unions are
not-for-profit enterprises.
How do these compare to the bennies at your shop?


Clearly if there is any truth to this then it's the pay & conditions
Krause gets from his employer Ullico & probably socialists being
socialists they pay all the employees the same!!! So here we have hard
working unionists being levied by their unions, who give the money to
the likes of Ullico who then pay their uneducated lying staff such as
Krause as per his own claims in his own words above, this is sad in the
extreme.

If you are in a union better start asking questions big time it's
your retirement they're ****ing against the wall, by paying themselves;

Even some in the NG found this lie over the top & said so;


Paid? Every year? I call "bull****". With 3 weeks vacation, 12 paid
holidays, and 20 paid sick days that's 47 *paid* days off every
year. Are they hourly employees? For a "small business", that's the road to
bankruptcy.



Boy...and you had me going there for a minute.


Even after that!!! not our lying Krause he just continues with the
previous line that his employer is putting big bucks into a political
campaign, how so??? they're a not for profit with tax concessions to
boot!!! it's illegal!!! send in the Feds!!! simple as that & remember
all you unionists it's "your" money they're
spending without your knowledge much less permission on "their"
political campaign!!!

So lying Krause continues & adds even more insight into what
happens to "your" money when it goes to the unions:-);

Not quite so simple, though you are trying hard to make it so. Our
business is up because we're on the cusp of an election year. Our
business always goes up in a major election year.
You could say we're going to be doing very well in 2004 because Bush is
such a total failure.
The 20 paid sick days aren't part of the "paid" days off unless those
days are used. None of our people abuses sick leave. In fact, no one as
yet has even come close to using 20 sick days in one year. They're there
in case they're needed.
Oh, I forgot. We also provide everyone with LTD.
The company provides an insurance plan that pays 50% of an employe's
salary for Long Term Disability. Employes have the option of purchasing
an additional 16.66%, bringing their total to 66.66%. The basic benefit
maximum is $4,000 per month. With the buy up, the limit is increased to
$10,000 per month.



In this case I suggest Krause just admits it's another of his lies
before any of his little socialist mates get nailed????

Internationally Acclaimed Education theorist and current Prof. Irwin
Corey Chair at the University of Alice Springs, K. Smith wrote:

You really should grow up a bit, this genuinely is a winner takes
all war, the reason you don't fully understand is that your admin has
successfully protected you from further attacks since 911.

Do grace us with yet more of your wisdom Oh esteemed one. Who did
attack the bldgs in New York and Washington?

prodigal1 wrote:
Internationally Acclaimed Education theorist and current Prof. Irwin
Corey Chair at the University of Alice Springs, K. Smith wrote:

You really should grow up a bit, this genuinely is a winner takes all
war, the reason you don't fully understand is that your admin has
successfully protected you from further attacks since 911.


Do grace us with yet more of your wisdom Oh esteemed one. Who did
attack the bldgs in New York and Washington?

Terrorists; the same terrorists that think nothing of suicide missions,
the same terrorists that want to destroy our civilization.

It would take one or two nuclear devices detonated in any western
democracy city & our entire system would be at risk of collapse, for we
would have little option but to respond without a pinpoint target.

It's not the 10s of thousands actually killed by any particular bomb
it's the knowledge it's happened & that terrorist groups can do it again
at will.

What's your suggestion just hand our countries over to the
terrorists?????? All start attending Friday prayers???

I'm sorry but the truth is that nuclear technology is easy to get, the
making of a crude device is certainly possible & has been for a long
time, right now our best bet is to ensure the delivery is as hard as we
can possibly make it for any terrorists.

The slight inconvenience that causes the occasional boat traveler is no
big deal, indeed the people spruiking this as an issue are not boaters &
would no more take a small boat offshore than fly to mars.

It's just part of the anti W political campaign from ungrateful
ignorant cowardly simpletons.


K

& Krause's lie of the day is:

Other than what he's picked up here over the years this liar
clearly doesn't & never has owned a boat & certainly never done any real
boating, yet he insults all the NG real boaters with lies like this;

Have you ever sailed from San Francisco to Hawaii? I have.
Have you ever rounded Cape Horn? I have, twice.
Have you ever transited the Panama Canal? I have.
Have you owned more than 20 boats in your lifetime? I have.
Have you ever sailed large boats competitively? I have.
Have you ever been hundreds of miles from land in a powerboat under
your command? I have.

Mecca - for starters.

-W

"K. Smith" wrote in message

for we
would have little option but to respond without a pinpoint target.

Clams Canino wrote:
Mecca - for starters.

-W

"K. Smith" wrote in message


for we
would have little option but to respond without a pinpoint target.




Hi Clams:-) Gee take it easy:-):-) hopefully we'll prevail & the people
themselves will see why our civilization has good health, equal
opportunity for all etc etc etc while their civilization is still in the
dark ages, indeed if we didn't pay then heaps to run our Chevs they'd
still be in tents riding camels, pretty much where we've driven their
leader:-)

K

& Krause's lie of the day is:

Other than what he's picked up here over the years this liar
clearly doesn't & never has owned a boat & certainly never done any real
boating, yet he insults all the NG real boaters with lies like this;

Have you ever sailed from San Francisco to Hawaii? I have.
Have you ever rounded Cape Horn? I have, twice.
Have you ever transited the Panama Canal? I have.
Have you owned more than 20 boats in your lifetime? I have.
Have you ever sailed large boats competitively? I have.
Have you ever been hundreds of miles from land in a powerboat under
your command? I have.

Clams Canino wrote:
Mecca - for starters.

_very_ _very_ bad karma
you are the poster boy for the "Stupid American"

ah well, one more idiot for the bin
plonk

K. Smith wrote:

baa ram ewe
baa ram ewe
only to Bush will we be true
baa ram ewe

you have nothing of interest or thoughtfulness to say
keep posting though
I'll keep an eye on you out of morbid curiosity

Who Knows? Nobody will investigate it.
Try yourself; Try to prove that anyone did it, and name them please.
Provide proof of your accusations too. They were Arabs you say? Really?
Prove it.

That is what is still missing here. 911 has NOT been solved. There is
plenty more to know before anyone can make accusations. Osama was the
named triggerman, but why aren't we even looking for him? We let him go in
Tora Bora, so that the war against "terror" (what terror?) could continue
to Iraq/Iran/Syria. Lies, lies, lies.

Disgusted



prodigal1 wrote:

Internationally Acclaimed Education theorist and current Prof. Irwin
Corey Chair at the University of Alice Springs, K. Smith wrote:

You really should grow up a bit, this genuinely is a winner takes
all war, the reason you don't fully understand is that your admin has
successfully protected you from further attacks since 911.

Do grace us with yet more of your wisdom Oh esteemed one. Who did
attack the bldgs in New York and Washington?