| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Subject: Shinnecock Inlet
From: (JAXAshby) Date: 10/18/2004 18:50 Pacific Standard Time Message-id: Big point. If the Canal/lock is owned and maintained by the County, then the Corp (sic) has no first hand interest, responsibility, or knowledge of said "lock". Corps, as well as the CG, makes specific mention of the canal, and specifically states there is a "gate" there but not a lock. maybe the Corps and the CG each believe a lock is used to move a boat from a body of water at one level to a body of water at another, while a gate is used to stop water flowing in one direction or the other. but what do they know? Doodles, some bad news for you..... What the Corps or USCG think or say, is NOT "the word according to God". If they don't consider it a "lock" ..... whoopdeedoo. There opinion is about as important or valid..... as yours (and we know that ain't worth cowpies). In all the arguments, I see you've never considered NOAA .... is that because you think the USCG is the one who makes the charts and Coast pilot, or is that because they sprecht differently? In truth, amateur mariner dumb butt, if someone wishes to call it a lock, then waddahey .... itsa lock. You really do need to return to the home for some "meds adjustment" Shen |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Cruise to Princess Louisa Inlet | General | |||
| Cruise to Princess Louisa Inlet | Cruising | |||
| sub sank ship off Fire Island inlet | ASA | |||
| Yet another brilliant boater at Ponce Inlet nearly gets KO'd. | General | |||
| To many pumps!!! | Boat Building | |||
Threaded Mode
