Geoffrey W. Schultz wrote:
Jeff,
Better yet, place him into your kill file. You won't see any more
posts from him. Unfortunately people will quote him in their
replies, but hey, what can you do? I've kill filed him and haven't
found the news group any less useful. As a matter of a fact, it's
better.

Amen, I did that as soon as I saw where the rant was going and the language
being used.

JAXhole has no concept of normal social dialog. His standard method
of discourse is to demean people over and over.

I noticed that, with much surprise as a newbie here. I am amazed how Jeff
can be as civil as he is with such gratuitous invective directed at him.

I'm sorry I even contributed and perhaps encouraged the direction of the
thread.

Regards,

BrianH

"BrianH" wrote in message ...
Geoffrey W. Schultz wrote:
Jeff,
Better yet, place him into your kill file. You won't see any more
posts from him. Unfortunately people will quote him in their
replies, but hey, what can you do? I've kill filed him and haven't
found the news group any less useful. As a matter of a fact, it's
better.

Amen, I did that as soon as I saw where the rant was going and the language
being used.

JAXhole has no concept of normal social dialog. His standard method
of discourse is to demean people over and over.

I noticed that, with much surprise as a newbie here. I am amazed how Jeff
can be as civil as he is with such gratuitous invective directed at him.

We've learned to ignore that side of jaxie; he has Tourette's Syndrome.

As I've said, I wouldn't have bothered to stay this far if there had not been an
important legal issue here.


I'm sorry I even contributed and perhaps encouraged the direction of the
thread.

Actually, this was interesting - One point that surprised me was that the law
allowing non-citizens to be in command was changed less than 10 years ago.
Before that, for instance, it would not have been legal for a Canadian to do a
bare-boat charter on a documented vessel from Hinckley.

Jeff Morris wrote:
"BrianH" wrote in message
...
Geoffrey W. Schultz wrote:
Jeff,
Better yet, place him into your kill file.
. I am amazed how Jeff
can be as civil as he is with such gratuitous invective directed at
him.

We've learned to ignore that side of jaxie; he has Tourette's
Syndrome.

I had to look that one up ....
"Behavioral and Developmental - Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder,
obsessions and compulsions, emotional lability, irritability, impulsivity,
aggressivity, and self-injurious behaviors; varied learning disabilities. "
Ah, well, okay - even so, it's not necessary to see such vitriolic rudeness
and blind refusal to accept another's point of view with wild, irrelevant
ramblings - ergo plonk.

I'm sorry I even contributed and perhaps encouraged the direction of
the thread.

Actually, this was interesting - One point that surprised me was that
the law allowing non-citizens to be in command was changed less than
10 years ago. Before that, for instance, it would not have been legal
for a Canadian to do a bare-boat charter on a documented vessel from
Hinckley.

To belabor a point, probably the Slovenes have registered but not documented
their craft and that is enough for the authorities in Ljubljana to accept -
perhaps not knowing of the subtle double procedure. How else could someone
have a US flagged ship for $100 (if my informant was honest about his
transaction)? That then begs the question of their true status when cruising
into other nations' waters.

The advertisement I cited was, as you mentioned, extremely vague about how
documentation for foreigners was accomplished. Perhaps it circumvented the
letter of the law but the spirit is clearly violated in some shady way and
they do not want to advertise it.

Best, BrianH.

************************************************** *********BRIQN!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!********************** ***************,

a **registered** vessel is NNNNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOTTTTTTTTT a "documented"
vessel, and ****therefore**** a registered vessel is not a US-flagged vessel.
US-flagged vessels hold valid documentation. That is the definition of the
term US-flagged.

why can you get that through your head.

geesh, rational discussion is not possible with you guys because you are not
capable of understanding even basic terms. Do traffic lights often confuse
you?

"BrianH"
Date: 10/5/2004 2:05 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:

Jeff Morris wrote:
"BrianH" wrote in message
...
Geoffrey W. Schultz wrote:
Jeff,
Better yet, place him into your kill file.
. I am amazed how Jeff
can be as civil as he is with such gratuitous invective directed at
him.

We've learned to ignore that side of jaxie; he has Tourette's
Syndrome.

I had to look that one up ....
"Behavioral and Developmental - Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder,
obsessions and compulsions, emotional lability, irritability, impulsivity,
aggressivity, and self-injurious behaviors; varied learning disabilities. "
Ah, well, okay - even so, it's not necessary to see such vitriolic rudeness
and blind refusal to accept another's point of view with wild, irrelevant
ramblings - ergo plonk.

I'm sorry I even contributed and perhaps encouraged the direction of
the thread.

Actually, this was interesting - One point that surprised me was that
the law allowing non-citizens to be in command was changed less than
10 years ago. Before that, for instance, it would not have been legal
for a Canadian to do a bare-boat charter on a documented vessel from
Hinckley.

To belabor a point, probably the Slovenes have registered but not documented
their craft and that is enough for the authorities in Ljubljana to accept -
perhaps not knowing of the subtle double procedure. How else could someone
have a US flagged ship for $100 (if my informant was honest about his
transaction)? That then begs the question of their true status when cruising
into other nations' waters.

The advertisement I cited was, as you mentioned, extremely vague about how
documentation for foreigners was accomplished. Perhaps it circumvented the
letter of the law but the spirit is clearly violated in some shady way and
they do not want to advertise it.

Best, BrianH.

On Tue, 5 Oct 2004 08:05:56 +0200, "BrianH" wrote:

The advertisement I cited was, as you mentioned, extremely vague about how
documentation for foreigners was accomplished.

==========================================

Very easily, ownership of the boat is through a US registered
corporation. The corporation then charters out the boat to who ever
is actually using the vessel.

On Tue, 05 Oct 2004 09:21:36 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Tue, 5 Oct 2004 08:05:56 +0200, "BrianH" wrote:

The advertisement I cited was, as you mentioned, extremely vague about how
documentation for foreigners was accomplished.

==========================================

Very easily, ownership of the boat is through a US registered
corporation. The corporation then charters out the boat to who ever
is actually using the vessel.

While this response is demonstrably correct - who is it intended to
convince?: the rational get it, and the lunatic fringe will not be
budged....

Brian W

and, brian, the fumb ducks will sit there smiling, like a rat eating dung.

what are you chewing on, brian?

Brian Whatcott
Date: 10/5/2004 12:57 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:

On Tue, 05 Oct 2004 09:21:36 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Tue, 5 Oct 2004 08:05:56 +0200, "BrianH" wrote:

The advertisement I cited was, as you mentioned, extremely vague about how
documentation for foreigners was accomplished.

==========================================

Very easily, ownership of the boat is through a US registered
corporation. The corporation then charters out the boat to who ever
is actually using the vessel.

While this response is demonstrably correct - who is it intended to
convince?: the rational get it, and the lunatic fringe will not be
budged....

Brian W

however, wayne you fumb duck, **IF** you had been awake you already know that
the corporation MUST have AT LEAST 75% of stock ownership in the hands of US
citizen *****AND***** both the Chm of the Bd and the CEO MUST be US citizens
*****AND***** the board of director may not have enough non-citizens to make a
quoram (look up the word).

wayne, you are one fumb duck sophist. perhaps not a malicious as jeffies, but
none too bright anyway.

Wayne.B
Date: 10/5/2004 9:21 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:

On Tue, 5 Oct 2004 08:05:56 +0200, "BrianH" wrote:

The advertisement I cited was, as you mentioned, extremely vague about how
documentation for foreigners was accomplished.

==========================================

Very easily, ownership of the boat is through a US registered
corporation. The corporation then charters out the boat to who ever
is actually using the vessel.

On 06 Oct 2004 01:51:46 GMT, (JAXAshby) wrote:

however, wayne you fumb duck, **IF** you had been awake you already know that
the corporation MUST have AT LEAST 75% of stock ownership in the hands of US
citizen *****AND***** both the Chm of the Bd and the CEO MUST be US citizens
*****AND***** the board of director may not have enough non-citizens to make a
quoram (look up the word).

wayne, you are one fumb duck sophist. perhaps not a malicious as jeffies, but
none too bright anyway.

===========================================

High praise coming from you. Obviously no one else could ever achieve
your exalted level of intellect. Question: Have you ever heard of
trusts and trustees? Where there are lawyers, there are ways. And if
US registration doesn't fly for some reason, there are lots of little
islands that are more accomodating.

way to way, weirdayne. leave it up to you to try to prove they US government
lawmakes and their entrustees was way too dumb to catch up to you.

howya doin' on that tax appeal?

Wayne.B
Date: 10/5/2004 11:04 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:

On 06 Oct 2004 01:51:46 GMT, (JAXAshby) wrote:

however, wayne you fumb duck, **IF** you had been awake you already know
that
the corporation MUST have AT LEAST 75% of stock ownership in the hands of US
citizen *****AND***** both the Chm of the Bd and the CEO MUST be US citizens
*****AND***** the board of director may not have enough non-citizens to make
a
quoram (look up the word).

wayne, you are one fumb duck sophist. perhaps not a malicious as jeffies,
but
none too bright anyway.

===========================================

High praise coming from you. Obviously no one else could ever achieve
your exalted level of intellect. Question: Have you ever heard of
trusts and trustees? Where there are lawyers, there are ways. And if
US registration doesn't fly for some reason, there are lots of little
islands that are more accomodating.