Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi all,
My wife has come to terms with buying a new boat. (This after the lady was towed in three out of four times she was with me!) In all fairness, I have been out on my old Signa (1970) with Johnson 100HP OB many times without incident. I am looking at a new Bayliner 185. This appeals to me because of newness (less tows) and warranty. In addition, this type of boat appeals to me as a sporty, crusing and skiing boat here on the Chain O Lakes area in Illinois. I am concerned about the construction of the boat (is this really fiberglass and is it repairable if it has been damaged (boat collision) and also the standard engine. (Should I opt for the mid-ranged engine HP?) Are there other alternatives to this in the similar price range? Off-line comments only to -- Best Regards, Frank Frank Krozel, Technical Representative, Electronic Instrument Associates Central, Inc. Website: http://www.electronicinstrument.com Voice: 630-924-1600 Fax: 630-924-1668 Cellular: 630-890-5421 24/7 Interested in EMC? See the 2005 information at http://www.emc2005.org This e-mail message may contain privileged or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose, use, disseminate, distribute, copy or rely upon this message or attachment in any way. If you received this e-mail message in error, please return by forwarding the message and its attachments to the sender. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'd say if you plan on having company along, the mid-option 190 hp would be
good. My philosophy on having a little extra power is you don't have to use it but it's there if/when you need/want it. Here's a link to Brunswick and from there you can get a lot of info on the the Bayliner 185 and other makes .... http://www.brunswick.com/boats.html "Frank Krozel" wrote in message ... Hi all, My wife has come to terms with buying a new boat. (This after the lady was towed in three out of four times she was with me!) In all fairness, I have been out on my old Signa (1970) with Johnson 100HP OB many times without incident. I am looking at a new Bayliner 185. This appeals to me because of newness (less tows) and warranty. In addition, this type of boat appeals to me as a sporty, crusing and skiing boat here on the Chain O Lakes area in Illinois. I am concerned about the construction of the boat (is this really fiberglass and is it repairable if it has been damaged (boat collision) and also the standard engine. (Should I opt for the mid-ranged engine HP?) Are there other alternatives to this in the similar price range? Off-line comments only to -- Best Regards, Frank Frank Krozel, Technical Representative, Electronic Instrument Associates Central, Inc. Website: http://www.electronicinstrument.com Voice: 630-924-1600 Fax: 630-924-1668 Cellular: 630-890-5421 24/7 Interested in EMC? See the 2005 information at http://www.emc2005.org This e-mail message may contain privileged or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose, use, disseminate, distribute, copy or rely upon this message or attachment in any way. If you received this e-mail message in error, please return by forwarding the message and its attachments to the sender. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I purchased the 2004 Bayliner 185 earlier this summer with the
optional 4.3 Merc 190 HP engine and I have absolutely no complaints. Many people I spoke with, mainly competing salesmen, called the Bayliner brand "junk" and worthless. In MHO however, this was mostly a bunch of horse droppings. The power plant on all these small runabouts is the same (ie Merc / Volvo), and construction quality on the Bayliner is more than adequate. The hull/furniture/fittings on the Bayliner are all reasonably sound, but not especially good. Given the thousands of dollars cheaper the Bayliner was to any other 18 footer with a 190 HP power plant, this was not a major issue for me. Again this is only my opinion, and unlike the salesmen & "experienced" boaters, I am relatively new to rec boating. On the other hand, I have a Master's degree in Marine Engineering and I spent 11 years in the Navy as an Engineering Officer. If the Bayliner was really as bad as some say, you can bet I would have bought something else. Bottom line, I am very pleased with the Bayliner 185, and with a reasonable amount of preventive maintenance, I am very confident the power plant, hull, and fittings will all hold up over time. I recommend you opt for the 4.3L engine upgrade. In general I always try to opt for the largest engine option for all my vehicles as the extra power is one of those things you don't know you need until it's too late. I would also recommend you consider the optional fiberglass deck with pop out carpet. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Canuack,
I've always thought of the Bayliner as a great inland lake boat. But it's not a boat to take out into a lot of rough water, not if you think it's built like a Fountain and should plow through a 3 foot chop at full speed. If you don't stress the boat it will probably give years of satisfaction. Paul "Exiled Canuck" wrote in message om... I purchased the 2004 Bayliner 185 earlier this summer with the optional 4.3 Merc 190 HP engine and I have absolutely no complaints. Many people I spoke with, mainly competing salesmen, called the Bayliner brand "junk" and worthless. In MHO however, this was mostly a bunch of horse droppings. The power plant on all these small runabouts is the same (ie Merc / Volvo), and construction quality on the Bayliner is more than adequate. The hull/furniture/fittings on the Bayliner are all reasonably sound, but not especially good. Given the thousands of dollars cheaper the Bayliner was to any other 18 footer with a 190 HP power plant, this was not a major issue for me. Again this is only my opinion, and unlike the salesmen & "experienced" boaters, I am relatively new to rec boating. On the other hand, I have a Master's degree in Marine Engineering and I spent 11 years in the Navy as an Engineering Officer. If the Bayliner was really as bad as some say, you can bet I would have bought something else. Bottom line, I am very pleased with the Bayliner 185, and with a reasonable amount of preventive maintenance, I am very confident the power plant, hull, and fittings will all hold up over time. I recommend you opt for the 4.3L engine upgrade. In general I always try to opt for the largest engine option for all my vehicles as the extra power is one of those things you don't know you need until it's too late. I would also recommend you consider the optional fiberglass deck with pop out carpet. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In MHO 16 - 22 foot bowriders such as the Bayliner 185 are designed
for a fun day on calm water, not to plow through three foot waves. I've had my 185 out in 1 - 2 foot swells and it was no fun. What's the point of taking a bowrider out in choppy water? Even if they can handle it, you're not having fun! I didn't buy a bowrider to go out in sea state 5, I saw enough of that in the North Atlantic. My goal is to get the kids up on a wakeboard, tool around inland waterways, have a picnic and go home. For that the Bayliner 185 has proven to be a good buy. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Bayliner 185 | General | |||
BAYLINER BASHERS.. | General | |||
Newbie questions | UK Power Boats | |||
New one on me - Laminate Flooring | General | |||
Bayliner Bashing | General |