Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wrong again.......all hospitals are required to provide emergency care,
regardless of financial condition or citizenship (part of CA's problem). The hospital can hound you for payment, turn your account over to a collection agency, and charge everyone else more (including those who wear their PFD's) but they can't refuse to provide emergency care. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"DUINK" wrote in message
... Wrong again.......all hospitals are required to provide emergency care, regardless of financial condition or citizenship (part of CA's problem). The hospital can hound you for payment, turn your account over to a collection agency, and charge everyone else more (including those who wear their PFD's) but they can't refuse to provide emergency care. True, but you ignore the obvious - that this care is paid for by taxpayers ONLY if the victim is penniless. If a who person can afford a $20,000 motorcycle has an accident he'd have pay for it himself - helmet or no helmet. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Proposed mandatory PFD law | General | |||
NTSB, August 25, "Mandatory" PFD | General | |||
Proposed new changes to HAM licensing | ASA | |||
Proposed: "PREAMBLE TO REC.BOATS FAQ" | General | |||
Proposed: "Preamble to FAQ- rec.boats" | General |