Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#18
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 1 Jan 2011 12:50:03 -0800 (PST), Bob
wrote: On Dec 31 2010, 11:37*pm, Gordon wrote: As far as your "organic" veggies.... Can you go into some details of the difference between nitrogen absorbed from fertilizer made from methane gas and that absorbed from horse ****? * * * Simple!!!! Look at the price. No fertilizer, no weeding, no spraying, DOUBLE the price! * Gordon Dear Gordon and Bruce: Dosing dirt with 20-20-20 fertilizer or for you lawn guys 20-0-0 presents its own problems.... as in turning your soil into concrete after a few years. Dirt needs organic materials as well, as in mulch, but thats not my main gripe. What does get me ****ed is all the pesticides, herbicides, fungi/mold, soil conditioners, etc and other wacky chemicals used to get a crop to market. I believe is harmful to us over time. First of all that really isn't true, at least not when you use the word "mulch" which certainly seems to imply an organic substance consisting of rotted vegetable matter - leaves, etc. I have been on farms where nothing has been put on the soil except for animal manure for the past hundred years and it was still happily growing a crop. As far as "soil conditioners" that too was being done, in some cases, certainly as far back as I can remember. You sent a sample to the State Agriculture people and they would send back an analysis of what you needed to plow into the ground for the next year, depending of course if your land was especially acidic, base, or what. The main use for this service, as I remember, was the potato farmers as potatoes need (I believe) base soils and they plowed in ashes, I think. The point isn't that you can't grow produce without chemicals, rather that you can't get the same production per hectare/acre, in other words you can't make as much money and lets face it every wants more money. But my point really wasn't whether you used fertilizer or not it was whether there was any difference between fertilizing with horse manure or with liquid nitrogen? After all the element in horse manure that the plants use is nitrogen. Apparently human manure is one of the best sources of nitrogen and is used pretty much all over the Orient. In fact, in China, I recently read that while in times past producers obtained human manure free in return for the service of pumping out the toilet tanks in the houses however recently the requirement had increased greatly and now it is no longer free but is now collected by entrepreneurs and sold to the farmers which has resulted in hard times for the farmers as cost of production has risen while sales profits have remained the same. As I said, human manure is very widely used, in fact so widely used in Taiwan that it is responsible for Taiwan having the highest rate of hepatitis in the world, at least it did some years ago. So I asked again, is it better to fertilize with natural products or with manufactured liquid nitrogen? The manufactured nitrogen being largely germ free. sniped Cheers, Bruce (bruceinbangkokatgmaildotcom) |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Air Compressor For Dockside Work | Boat Building | |||
Air compressor for hull cleaning | Cruising | |||
Fractional Rig Offers Advantages Over Masthead Rig | Cruising | |||
hookah | Cruising | |||
Genset / DC/ H20 MKR / Fridge / Air Compressor Project? | Boat Building |