Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#19
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Capt. JG" wrote in message easolutions... Yep. I'm mostly in the SF bay, but do take overnights in the bay and in other nearby places. If you're careful about where you stop, you can always get decent holding. My Bruce is in the same range. I think my old boat shoe would hold well in bay mud. If I was going anywhere of significance, I would upgrade the current Bruce. (I also have a backup Danforth 13 in a lazz.) What is your Danforth like? I imported my boat from USA and it came with Danforth bower and kedge anchors. The main anchor weighed 22 lb and had quite good area of flukes but I immediately threw it out because the shank was cut from plate only 3/16" thick. This was supposed to be Ok for a 38' boat weighing 16000 lb! .. To make matters worse the shank was shaped like a very long triangle, thinning down to only 1/2" wide at the point where you shackle on the rode. By my calculation that 1/2" x 3/16" section has a breaking strain of only just over 1 ton which is totally insufficient. Moreover, what happens to such a thin shank when the anchor is dug well in and the tide turns? . It has got to bend. I have the thing at home and am reluctant to sell it on because some unsuspecting person might rely on it for serious work. Yet it claims to be a genuine Danforth. IIRC Danforths were invented during the war to haul landing craft back off the beach but I feel pretty certain that they used to be more substantially made than this one. The smaller kedge has never been used and therefore still bears a label claiming to be a genuine Danforth. Something is wrong somewhere. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Single handing and watch keeping | Cruising | |||
I still prefer single handing | ASA | |||
Single blister | Boat Building | |||
land anchor vs fluke anchor for anchors set directly on beach | Cruising |