Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gogarty wrote:
... I did most of my research at the Library of Congress and had access to all the original documents. I doubt those sails could have been very effective at all. Puts me in mind of vestigial organs or limbs that once had a function but no longer do and nobody can figure out why they are still there except they always have been. I measn look at the design of your average 1920s megayacht with long bowsprit and clipper bow and raked masts that might carry sails but never did. My guess, for what it's worth: with no sails, Titanic might have made 3 points off downwind to either side with no adverse run of the sea. With both sails set, you might notch it up to 4 points off the downwind, and a shade faster.... Brian W |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brian Whatcott wrote:
My guess, for what it's worth: with no sails, Titanic might have made 3 points off downwind to either side with no adverse run of the sea. With both sails set, you might notch it up to 4 points off the downwind, and a shade faster.... Oh c'mon...look at the rake to her masts! Surely the schooner Titanic would have pointed like a witch! Actually IIRC the major purpose of carrying sails was to qualify as a mail ship. Ancient regulations & all that. DSK |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Fun with Google Earth | General | |||
NWS radar on Google Earth! | Cruising | |||
Google Earth Nautical Charts (EarthNC) | Cruising | |||
Any good Google Earth presentation for ICW ? | Cruising | |||
If you like Google Earth | General |