wrote in message
...
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 16:24:04 -0500, Marty wrote:

Dave wrote:
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 14:30:23 -0500, Marty said:

Has the Supreme Court amended the Constitution? If so what are the
Amendment numbers please?

You can identify some of them pretty easily. Just do a search for the
words
"privacy," "penumbra," "first trimester," "sodomy" and "one man one
vote."

What's that you say? You can't find those words? Well, I'll be damned!


Your are a bit of on odd duck Dave. I can remember asking you just what
you thought the meaning of the Second Amendment was and you expressed
the sentiment that you had no opinion because the Supreme Court had not
rendered an opinion,,

Now it appears that when the Court renders an opinion that you disagree
with, you accuse them of being mentally incompetent.

You do agree that Constitution and later history imbues the Court with
the power to interpret the Constitution, and if they interpret in a way
that fits with your rather right of center views that's fine. If they
interpret otherwise you accuse them of "amending".

Cheers
Martin

Similar to the use of the phrase "Activist Judges", who are judges
that rule against your position.



Like the court that decided the 2000 election for us. They weren't
activist... nope, no way!


--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com