Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
rhys wrote:
..... one more sailboat, even a Macgregor, instead of one more jetski, has *got* to be the lesser of two evils, wouldn't you agree? Oh yes, most definitely. I try not to sneer at trimarans and cats, either, because they provide a *different*, but equally valid and perfectly enjoyable alternative to my preferred monohull. Where I tend to get snotty is on the issue of seaworthiness: if you accept that a cat with a big flat sliding glass door on its bridge is going to have issues in a following sea, then you understand my objections are not to catamarans, but to catamarans that want to be patio sunrooms. South Africa builds some apparently incredibly tough blue-water cats (they'd have to, given the conditions there), and while I'd personally have to learn to sail 'em, I'd let the brother buy one. Over a Macgregor, even. Oh c'mon, we all know in our heart of hearts that *no* multihull can ever be really seaworthy, right ![]() Anyway, there are more than one or two monohulls better suited to be dockside tiki bars than sailing vessels, so it doesn't bother me that some multihulls have the same issues. The basic point, as I see it, is to understand the capabilities of your vessel and to know how to make her perform. A Mac26X owner who is convinced that his boat is as stable as a deep keel boat, and has the same windward performance as a J-24, can plane under sail, and 'round Cape Horn with ease, falls short of this IMHO. BTW my friends who have owned these boats did not generally fall into this category. Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Seaworthiness | Boat Building |