Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to can.rec.boating,rec.boats,rec.boats.building
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote in message
. .. jamesgangnc wrote: "Wade Carl Henley" wrote in message ... I am looking to purchase the above mentioned boat, was wondering if anyone out there have had any experience with this boat, good,bad or ugly. All opinions welcome. Topics of interest for me is over all rating that you guys put to this boat, any problems...good points, bad points that sort of thing. Thanks Glenn It has compromises to be a cruiser at that size but if your use is mainly fair weather boating they are not a big issue. One of the main things to watch for on just about all the boats is being under powered. A lot of manufacturers, in order to keep the entry price low, will sell boats with the smallest engine they can get away with. I think this one can be had with a 5.0 (305) small block. Once you load it up with a 5.0 it probably takes forever to get on plane and has to be run "floored" to get any speed. If you test drive a boat bring a pile of your friends to act as "load". A 5.7 (350) would be the bare minimum for me on that boat and a big block would be ideal. Don't let anyone tell you a smaller engine gets better milage. The difference is not that significant and the lack of performance will be quite noticeable. I think the 5.7 is the largest available engine for a boat this size. I have seen them add the DuolProp or Alpha 3 to improve the ability to get on plane, but a 7.4 liter engine would take up too much space and encroach into the space they use for the mid berth. That's too bad. The size difference is not as much as people think. A few more inches on the front, sides, and top. I think you mean a bravo 3. Volvo has a dual prop drive as well. Those will help and in combination with a 5.7 probably work well on this boat. I'm guessing that adds 6 to 8 grand to the base price though. A 5.0 with an alpha II would suck. |
#2
![]()
posted to can.rec.boating,rec.boats,rec.boats.building
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 08:56:07 -0400, "jamesgangnc"
wrote: That's too bad. The size difference is not as much as people think. A few more inches on the front, sides, and top. I think you mean a bravo 3. Volvo has a dual prop drive as well. Those will help and in combination with a 5.7 probably work well on this boat. I'm guessing that adds 6 to 8 grand to the base price though. A 5.0 with an alpha II would suck. IMHO, the ideal engine would be the Mercruiser 6.2L MPI with a Bravo 3 duo-prop. We have that combo on our Searay 270, and at 320 hp it is a strong little engine. I believe that it's based on a stroked small block. The Bayliner in question has got to be seriously under powered with a single 5.0L, as demonstrated by the one reviewer who is cruising at 4500 RPM. That is a sure recipe for premature engine failure. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Bayliner 2655 | General | |||
Anyone know?? Power Steering Pump - OMC 460 1988 Bayliner 2655 | General | |||
HELP!! Power Steering Pump - OMC 460 1988 Bayliner 2655 | General | |||
towing a bayliner ciera 2655 with a volvo xc90 2.5T AWD? | General | |||
Bayliner 185 | General |