Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats.cruising,rec.boats.building
Roger Long
 
Posts: n/a
Default Drive Saver/Spacer users sought

"Jere Lull" wrote

I may be hyper-sensitive to noise and vibration, but the drivesaver
makes my motoring time more enjoyable.... Okay, less objectionable.

I have no doubt that it does. My point was that setting up everything
PROPERLY would very likely produce an even smoother running system.
The key word is properly. Few boats have their shaft systems machined
properly which makes a good market for the Drivesaver. At least this
is the opinion of the people who have set up the demanding drive
trains in my 1400+ HP boats so they run far smoother than my sailboat.

Doing it right probably would cost quite a bit more than a drivesaver
which may also help keep those folks in business.

One thing I hadn't thought of:

The shafts on the boats I'm used to dealing with are very
conservatively designed and I've almost never heard of one breaking,
even when the wheels are totally trashed. With the small shafts
common on many yachts, it might make sense to have a "fuse" in the
system that is cheaper than the shaft.

I'll have to confess that I don't deal with the nitty gritty details
of shafts; just the basic layout and sizing. I'm simply passing on
what a guy who has solved shaft problems that others couldn't on boats
from fast patrol boats to aircraft carriers told me when I said,
"shouldn't we have a Shaftsaver?"

I'm sure opinions vary. The shaft shop you talk to may love to just
take stuff out of boxes and sell it to you alone with a Shaftsaver for
the same price as doing it the right way. They may not even know the
right way in which cast the Shaftsaver is your best option.

Like I said, taking the one out of my shaft line is about item number
6374 on my list of things I'd like to do.

--

Roger Long





  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats.cruising,rec.boats.building
Evan Gatehouse
 
Posts: n/a
Default Drive Saver/Spacer users sought

I'm sort of disagreeing with Roger here with his suggestion (I think)
of flexibly mounted engines but a rigid shaft coupling. On all the
vessels that we design, 95% use flexible mounts. We like Lo-Rez
because they are very soft (~0.5" static deflection). But to use them
you HAVE to have a flexible coupling because otherwise all that
vibration will get into the structure via the shaft and stuffing box.

Evan Gatehouse
  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats.cruising,rec.boats.building
Roger Long
 
Posts: n/a
Default Drive Saver/Spacer users sought

"Evan Gatehouse" wrote

I'm sort of disagreeing with Roger here with his suggestion (I
think) of flexibly mounted engines but a rigid shaft coupling.


It's probably not a disagreement but having lost track here of a point
in the thread. I'm talking about a specific drive train configuration
which is common on sailboats.

There must be a flexible stuffing box or shaft seal and there must be
no other bearings other than the stern strut. The engine can be on
very soft mounts. There is then nothing except the cutlass to pick up
any shaft vibration. The shaft is long enough to flex and accommodate
the engine motion. The full length version of this video

http://marine.unh.edu/Images/Gulf%20Challenger.wmv

shows a cup of coffee sitting on the quarter bit while the boat is
going 20 knots and there isn't a ripple on the surface. The struts
pick up very little vibration.

As soon as you introduce a second bearing into a the shaft system with
soft engine mounts, you have to have something flexible between the
gear and the shaft. I've made the shafts slightly oversize on my fast
research vessels to eliminate the need for a second bearing, way, way,
cheaper than installing and lining up that second bearing.

BTW there is a direct relationship between how much the engine can
move and the frequency of vibration isolated. Thin rubber pads take
out the high whine but getting the low throb and rumble out requires
letting the engine move 3/8" to 1/2" as you say you are doing.

--

Roger Long


  #4   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats.cruising,rec.boats.building
Roger Long
 
Posts: n/a
Default Drive Saver/Spacer users sought

Evan,

I'm curious. What kind of boats does a phone company design or is
your header showing something odd for an organization?

--

Roger Long



"Evan Gatehouse" wrote in message
...
I'm sort of disagreeing with Roger here with his suggestion (I
think) of flexibly mounted engines but a rigid shaft coupling. On
all the vessels that we design, 95% use flexible mounts. We like
Lo-Rez because they are very soft (~0.5" static deflection). But to
use them you HAVE to have a flexible coupling because otherwise all
that vibration will get into the structure via the shaft and
stuffing box.

Evan Gatehouse



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FS Reduced! Now $340! Complete engine drive and 110VAC dual system dual cold plate refrigeration in St. Pete, FL Skip Gundlach Marketplace 0 February 2nd 06 11:02 PM
FS Reduced! Now $360! Complete engine drive and 110VAC dual system dual cold plate refrigeration in St. Pete, FL Skip Gundlach Marketplace 0 January 19th 06 09:19 PM
FS Reduced! Now $380! Complete engine drive and 110VAC dual system dual cold plate refrigeration in St. Pete, FL Skip Gundlach Marketplace 0 January 4th 06 04:25 PM
Build Your own refrigeration - cheap parts for engine drive and 110VAC dual system Skip Gundlach Boat Building 0 December 19th 05 06:31 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:19 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017