Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doing a really rough vector analysis it appears that with the rudder
within 15º of midships there is very little difference in the turning force between a single and a double cylinder setup but because one cylinder is pushing out while the other is pulling in, the pressure on the pintle is somewhat less. Not sure it is enough to justify a second cylinder with the extra cost, hose and fittings though. Not much to be gained in redundancy either. The most likely point of failure is not the cylinders but the pump, hose and fittings. garry crothers wrote: "Meindert Sprang" wrote in message ... "garry crothers" wrote in message ... Excuse my ignorance, but how can I tell if the cylinder is double action or single. I've just looked at the Vetus catalogue and cant see any reference to single or double? I think all Vetus cylinders are double action. If you see one hose nipple on each end of the cylinder, they definately are. Besides, I fail to see how two rams can prevent any twist anywhere in the rudder system. Meindert I believe that the advantage with two rams is that, because one cylinder pushes aft, while the other pulls forward with the same force, the only force on the rudder stock is the desired twisting, and no side loading is imposed, as the case would be with the use of a single cylinder. But then again I am no expert, garry -- Glenn Ashmore I'm building a 45' cutter in strip/composite. Watch my progress (or lack there of) at: http://www.rutuonline.com Shameless Commercial Division: http://www.spade-anchor-us.com |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Glenn Ashmore" wrote in message news:QgkDb.4899$JD6.4249@lakeread04... Doing a really rough vector analysis it appears that with the rudder within 15º of midships there is very little difference in the turning force between a single and a double cylinder setup but because one cylinder is pushing out while the other is pulling in, the pressure on the pintle is somewhat less. Not sure it is enough to justify a second cylinder with the extra cost, hose and fittings though. Not much to be gained in redundancy either. The most likely point of failure is not the cylinders but the pump, hose and fittings. Well, it would certainly make life a lot simpler if you reckon I could get away with it. I dont know much about hydraulics, hence the question, I will speak to some of the suppliers for further opinions. thanks again for your input garry |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Alternator Belt Sizing | General | |||
Do large outboards need hydraulic steering? | General | |||
Backstay hydraulic tensioner | General | |||
Wet exhaust sizing. | Boat Building | |||
Hydraulic steering seizing remedies please | General |