LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1   Report Post  
bioengineer@
 
Posts: n/a
Default Rot Conclusion


Well I was hoping the Timber Rot, thread would work its way up to
something useful for boat guys. Quite a few industries have
"Systems"in place - but it seems I couldn't find one for boats.
As a consultant - I track and solve problems through systems.

Glasshouses have systems in place to reduce fungus damage by
controlling temp, humidify with ventilation, - constant checks and
sprays, and removing isolating potential problems, are part of the
horticultural way of life, and well understood.
The same is true of many food and health related industries - system
related problem solving - But I am stuffed if I could see any kind of
a system for boats?
This also gave me reason to doubts the experts here, as or anywhere on
this subject - As there was no system procedures as a base for
discussion, or did they have any, or know what the hell it was.
But a part was called constant monitoring - so what are the monitoring
procedures - what is it you are looking for the idicators?
The experts here didn't know?
So it just a bunch of trade types - not experts at all.

So my only conclusion for the bluster, bull****, sales hype, and
miracle solutions, and the general ignorance - as its seems even the
expert boat builders are not relying on second hand mis-quoted info -
A point is, one boat builder said as long as the timber is less than
20% moisture - it is safe - I say Rubbish, as any drip of
condensation on just a small portion of that timber is enough to
activate the spore, one slight piece of dampness, drip, condensation,
or under a damp rag is enough - You should be visually aware of any
slight water stain on that timber. The dangers of sealing in timber,
lack of ventilation - storing boats, even out of water is a dangerous
practice, without ventilation.

Some of the generalization by experts is stupid and cavalier.
I think the only real solution, is in fact for Marine Safety
Authorities. As I see it as their responsibility to set out some
guidelines, and make recommendations on a series of steps for both
prevention discursion and repair, with a practical website with
sensible photos for ID etc.

To many experts, to much bluster, to much ignorance, a dangerous
combination - So we need someone to sign the bloody thing off with
some authority.

And I would say its in the ballpark of the Marine Authorities.
You would think they would have had something sorted out by now?
Interesting thread.

Its still rational.
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
( OT) Bush disputes al Qaida-Saddam conclusion (Of the committe HE appointed) Jim General 3 June 18th 04 05:22 PM
O.T. Did I Really Say That: How soon they forget RGrew176 General 44 November 17th 03 03:48 PM
malibu response question J.W. Frank General 26 July 11th 03 02:26 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:11 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017