Thread: Rot Conclusion
View Single Post
  #2   Report Post  
Bill Gough
 
Posts: n/a
Default Rot Conclusion

On Fri, 04 Jul 2003 10:24:18 +1200,
wrote:


Well I was hoping the Timber Rot, thread would work its way up to
something useful for boat guys. Quite a few industries have
"Systems"in place - but it seems I couldn't find one for boats.
As a consultant - I track and solve problems through systems.

Glasshouses have systems in place to reduce fungus damage by
controlling temp, humidify with ventilation, - constant checks and
sprays, and removing isolating potential problems, are part of the
horticultural way of life, and well understood.
The same is true of many food and health related industries - system
related problem solving - But I am stuffed if I could see any kind of
a system for boats?
This also gave me reason to doubts the experts here, as or anywhere on
this subject - As there was no system procedures as a base for
discussion, or did they have any, or know what the hell it was.
But a part was called constant monitoring - so what are the monitoring
procedures - what is it you are looking for the idicators?
The experts here didn't know?
So it just a bunch of trade types - not experts at all.

So my only conclusion for the bluster, bull****, sales hype, and
miracle solutions, and the general ignorance - as its seems even the
expert boat builders are not relying on second hand mis-quoted info -
A point is, one boat builder said as long as the timber is less than
20% moisture - it is safe - I say Rubbish, as any drip of
condensation on just a small portion of that timber is enough to
activate the spore, one slight piece of dampness, drip, condensation,
or under a damp rag is enough - You should be visually aware of any
slight water stain on that timber. The dangers of sealing in timber,
lack of ventilation - storing boats, even out of water is a dangerous
practice, without ventilation.

Some of the generalization by experts is stupid and cavalier.
I think the only real solution, is in fact for Marine Safety
Authorities. As I see it as their responsibility to set out some
guidelines, and make recommendations on a series of steps for both
prevention discursion and repair, with a practical website with
sensible photos for ID etc.

To many experts, to much bluster, to much ignorance, a dangerous
combination - So we need someone to sign the bloody thing off with
some authority.

And I would say its in the ballpark of the Marine Authorities.
You would think they would have had something sorted out by now?
Interesting thread.

Its still rational.


Why must the government solve your problem, you imply you are an
expert in problem solving. Research the facts and formulate a system
for yourself, you might even get rich marketing it.