Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mungo Bulge wrote:
http://www.yanmarhelp.com/i_propclr.htm It makes sense all around. The need for an aperture is to allow smooth flow of water into the prop, to reduce cavitation. Now that you have all this smooth flowing water accelerated by the efficient prop, why spoil it all by bumping into a rudder or other deadwood? Well it eventually "bumps into the rudder" anyway... IMHO, on a sailboat, rudder efficiency is far more important than getting the last ounce of effort out of a prop. Not only does an efficient rudder make handling easier but it also gives some additional lift and that is precisely the reason for my question. Brian C "Roger Derby" wrote in message ink.net... | Could it be for clearance when the rudder is deflected? | | Roger | | http://home.earthlink.net/~derbyrm | | "Brian Cleverly" wrote in message | ... | Does anyone have any thoughts/theories on the reason for extending the | prop aperture into the rudder when the rudder is hung off the back of a | long-keel. | | I would imagine it would drastically reduce rudder efficiency, but | possibly allow more of the prop to receive undisturbed water when | backing-up. | | Thots anyone ? | | Brian C | | |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Changing Prop inwater. (lessons learned) | Cruising | |||
prop advise needed | General | |||
Volvo 270 outdrive prop cone replacement? | General | |||
Removing lower unit from 40 hp Johnson outboard - Help? | General | |||
1972 Johnson 20 HP - Can't Find A Prop | Boat Building |