Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
So, effectively, without a vacuum (or, at least, a free-space non-touching
environment), the addtion of aluminum foil merely acts to accelerate (aluminum being an excellent heat conductor) heat transfer? Yes, the heat would tend to conduct right through the aluminum. However, given that the materials on each side would tend to have lower levels of conduction, the aluminum probably has no effect either way. In other words, if you sandwiched a layer of foil between two layers of insulation, the overall conduction would be nearly the same as the insulation layers alone. Thus, for example, the foil-faced building insulation products are no better than the level of vacuum behind them? I'm not sure what the advantage of foil-faced foam board is over non-faced foam board in housing applications. I have a call in to my brother who is a building materials guru. I will pass on the information when I hear from him. I'd been migrating to the thought of layering heavy foil between the highest R-value foam I could find, and then doing a heat-sealed vapor barrier wrap, evacuated to the best of my ability. However, your comments suggest that's a waste of time. Yes, I believe that would be a waste of time. My hot tub cover had a heat sealed vapor barrier around the foam insulation. After a few years it got so heavy from trapped moisture, I had to replace it. And, that was after unwrapping it and letting it dry in the sun for three months. I *think* I understand you to say that foil is counterproductive if not faced with a vacuum. If so, from that, if I'm not going to spring for the vacuum panels, simple block foam, encapsulated to prevent moisture, is the best? Yes, the foam is then the best way. Some other thoughts: 1) Wet insulation is an excellent heat conductor 2) When insulation gets wet, it can be almost impossible to dry out. 3) It's almost impossible to totally encapsulate the insulation around a boat ice box. 4) Imperfections will allow air to move in and out of the insulation. 5) When the air is cool and dense it will migrate into the insulation. 6) When the air is warmed it will expand, release its moisture, and move out. 7) After enough cycles of cooling and warming, the insulation will be wet from the released moisture. This is why you have a vapor barrier in your house between the interior and the insulation, but not on the outside. These problems can be minimized by not trying to encapsulate the insulation. Give it a way to dry out between cycles. Also, try to use closed cell foam instead of open cell. You can test your insulation before installing it buy breaking off a small piece, carefully weigh it, put it in a glass of water for a few days, take it out and weigh it again. If there's no appreciable weight gain, it should work okay on your boat. My box exterior (which is a single layer of roving over the hard urethane 2") is currently exposed for most of two sides. I'd thought to put foil on that exterior surface. If I understand you properly, that's counterproductive? Unless the exterior is exposed to a strong radiant heat source, the foil won't help. On to the last: Is that like the lead foam used in noise control, nearly as expensive as heat shield :{)) ? Or is there some other noise abatement of which I'm not aware (there are probably encyclopediea worth of info of which I'm not aware!)? Is this an application where a foil-backed insultion board would help? Yes, it's like the lead & foam sound insulation. I'm using a sound blocking product with a back layer of foam, a layer of some type of semi-rigid plastic, a thicker layer of foam , and faced with shiny Mylar. About an inch and a quarter overall thicknes. I don't remember the brand name but the price was not out of line. My local rubber products retailer carries it in stock. Foil faced insulation in an engine room would work to keep radiant and convected heat away from living spaces. But shiny-faced sound control products with their 'decoupled' layer would do a better overall job. Low emissivity surfaces are very effective at minimizing heat gain from non-contact radiant sources. This includes the sun or even a hot engine block. They are not a solution to other problems. Rusty O Thanks again for your knowledgeable input. L8R Skip and Lydia |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Boater wannabe questions (Pacific Northwest area) | General | |||
Calling reefer upgraders with VIP experience | Boat Building | |||
Calling reefer upgraders with VIP experience | Cruising | |||
Lots of questions :) | General | |||
Newbie questions | UK Power Boats |