It looks like nearly 40 years in the Senate isn't enough experience to
finish off a hockey mom running for Vice President.

No wonder Joe thinks Hillary was a better choice.

Palin looked great, she lost a few pounds and she really connected with the
people. It's apparent that she is the true agent of change.

If Joe has all this experience we must ask ourselves: "Are we better off now
then 40 years ago?"

Who shoulders more blame for the current mess the country is in - Joe Biden
or Sarah Palin?

On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 07:50:20 -0600, "Charles Momsen"
wrote:

It looks like nearly 40 years in the Senate isn't enough experience to
finish off a hockey mom running for Vice President.

No wonder Joe thinks Hillary was a better choice.

Palin looked great, she lost a few pounds and she really connected with the
people. It's apparent that she is the true agent of change.

If Joe has all this experience we must ask ourselves: "Are we better off now
then 40 years ago?"

Who shoulders more blame for the current mess the country is in - Joe Biden
or Sarah Palin?


Do you really think it would have boosted Biden's appeal if he had
gone in hard and made the pretty lady look stupid....she's managing
that all by herself.




OzOne of the three twins

I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace.

OzOne wrote:
On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 07:50:20 -0600, "Charles Momsen"
wrote:

It looks like nearly 40 years in the Senate isn't enough experience to
finish off a hockey mom running for Vice President.

No wonder Joe thinks Hillary was a better choice.

Palin looked great, she lost a few pounds and she really connected with the
people. It's apparent that she is the true agent of change.

If Joe has all this experience we must ask ourselves: "Are we better off now
then 40 years ago?"

Who shoulders more blame for the current mess the country is in - Joe Biden
or Sarah Palin?


Do you really think it would have boosted Biden's appeal if he had
gone in hard and made the pretty lady look stupid....she's managing
that all by herself.

Subtlety is oft wasted on 'Meriricans Oz.

Cheers
Marty

OzOne wrote in message ...
On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 07:50:20 -0600, "Charles Momsen"
wrote:

It looks like nearly 40 years in the Senate isn't enough experience to
finish off a hockey mom running for Vice President.

No wonder Joe thinks Hillary was a better choice.

Palin looked great, she lost a few pounds and she really connected with
the
people. It's apparent that she is the true agent of change.

If Joe has all this experience we must ask ourselves: "Are we better off
now
then 40 years ago?"

Who shoulders more blame for the current mess the country is in - Joe
Biden
or Sarah Palin?


Do you really think it would have boosted Biden's appeal if he had
gone in hard and made the pretty lady look stupid....she's managing
that all by herself.


If Palin is stupid then Yahoo Serious is Einstein.

"Marty" wrote in message
...

Subtlety is oft wasted on 'Meriricans Oz.


But a good troll is never wasted on the foolish.

On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 17:06:36 -0600, "Charles Momsen"
wrote:


OzOne wrote in message ...
On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 07:50:20 -0600, "Charles Momsen"
wrote:

It looks like nearly 40 years in the Senate isn't enough experience to
finish off a hockey mom running for Vice President.

No wonder Joe thinks Hillary was a better choice.

Palin looked great, she lost a few pounds and she really connected with
the
people. It's apparent that she is the true agent of change.

If Joe has all this experience we must ask ourselves: "Are we better off
now
then 40 years ago?"

Who shoulders more blame for the current mess the country is in - Joe
Biden
or Sarah Palin?


Do you really think it would have boosted Biden's appeal if he had
gone in hard and made the pretty lady look stupid....she's managing
that all by herself.


If Palin is stupid then Yahoo Serious is Einstein.


She's not stupid...just very uninformed, inexperienced and naive.
She's the pretty face to appeal to those who know nothing of the real
state of your nation......and that's probably what will see her as VP.




OzOne of the three twins

I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace.

On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 18:13:22 -0400, Marty wrote:


Subtlety is oft wasted on 'Meriricans Oz.

Cheers
Marty

Does that account for the popularity of Kath and Kim?

Have you even heard of Kath and Kim?




OzOne of the three twins

I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace.

OzOne wrote:
On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 18:13:22 -0400, Marty wrote:

Subtlety is oft wasted on 'Meriricans Oz.

Cheers
Marty

Does that account for the popularity of Kath and Kim?

Have you even heard of Kath and Kim?

Can't say that I have. They on the telly?

Cheers
Marty

On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 21:05:57 -0400, Marty wrote:

OzOne wrote:
On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 18:13:22 -0400, Marty wrote:

Subtlety is oft wasted on 'Meriricans Oz.

Cheers
Marty

Does that account for the popularity of Kath and Kim?

Have you even heard of Kath and Kim?

Can't say that I have. They on the telly?

Cheers
Marty

Apparently, according to the adverts here, "a smash hit"...don't watch
it myself and what little I've seen, I can't imagine your average
American getting it.




OzOne of the three twins

I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace.

OzOne wrote:
On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 21:05:57 -0400, Marty wrote:

OzOne wrote:
On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 18:13:22 -0400, Marty wrote:

Subtlety is oft wasted on 'Meriricans Oz.

Cheers
Marty
Does that account for the popularity of Kath and Kim?

Have you even heard of Kath and Kim?
Can't say that I have. They on the telly?

Cheers
Marty

Apparently, according to the adverts here, "a smash hit"...don't watch
it myself and what little I've seen, I can't imagine your average
American getting it.


One gets an interesting insight living in Canada, country full of
displaced Brits, we get a lot of BBC and ITV stuff, then two or three
years later we can see the US version of the same show....usually it is
a rather retrograde process.

Cheers
Marty