OzOne wrote:
On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 18:13:22 -0400, Marty wrote:

Subtlety is oft wasted on 'Meriricans Oz.

Cheers
Marty

Does that account for the popularity of Kath and Kim?

Have you even heard of Kath and Kim?

Can't say that I have. They on the telly?

Cheers
Marty

On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 21:05:57 -0400, Marty wrote:

OzOne wrote:
On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 18:13:22 -0400, Marty wrote:

Subtlety is oft wasted on 'Meriricans Oz.

Cheers
Marty

Does that account for the popularity of Kath and Kim?

Have you even heard of Kath and Kim?

Can't say that I have. They on the telly?

Cheers
Marty

Apparently, according to the adverts here, "a smash hit"...don't watch
it myself and what little I've seen, I can't imagine your average
American getting it.




OzOne of the three twins

I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace.

OzOne wrote:
On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 21:05:57 -0400, Marty wrote:

OzOne wrote:
On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 18:13:22 -0400, Marty wrote:

Subtlety is oft wasted on 'Meriricans Oz.

Cheers
Marty
Does that account for the popularity of Kath and Kim?

Have you even heard of Kath and Kim?
Can't say that I have. They on the telly?

Cheers
Marty

Apparently, according to the adverts here, "a smash hit"...don't watch
it myself and what little I've seen, I can't imagine your average
American getting it.


One gets an interesting insight living in Canada, country full of
displaced Brits, we get a lot of BBC and ITV stuff, then two or three
years later we can see the US version of the same show....usually it is
a rather retrograde process.

Cheers
Marty