Dave wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:33:18 -0500, Marty said:

Now Red Cloud was longer, of steel rather than fiberglass
and engaged in commercial operation, surely of more value than a toy
used for the diversions of the rich?

Um...Marty, how do you throw adjectives like "the rich" into a value
equation. Is there some calculus by which you can determine how much more a
poor man's boat is worth than that of a rich man?


Ah, now Dave I think you're merely being disingenuous, rather than
merely simple. It is obvious to most that the assets of the "rich" are
indeed more worthy protecting. Now don't bother spouting some nonsense
about paranoia, it happens repeatedly. I'll bet you that if one of the
Duponts reports their dog missing in Delaware that there will be a much
larger effort given to finding it than if you report your dog missing.

To deny that money buys influence and that sycophancy is nonexistent is
simply foolish.

Cheers
Marty

"Marty" wrote in message
...
Dave wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:33:18 -0500, Marty said:

Now Red Cloud was longer, of steel rather than fiberglass and engaged in
commercial operation, surely of more value than a toy used for the
diversions of the rich?

Um...Marty, how do you throw adjectives like "the rich" into a value
equation. Is there some calculus by which you can determine how much more
a
poor man's boat is worth than that of a rich man?


Ah, now Dave I think you're merely being disingenuous, rather than merely
simple. It is obvious to most that the assets of the "rich" are indeed
more worthy protecting. Now don't bother spouting some nonsense about
paranoia, it happens repeatedly. I'll bet you that if one of the Duponts
reports their dog missing in Delaware that there will be a much larger
effort given to finding it than if you report your dog missing.

To deny that money buys influence and that sycophancy is nonexistent is
simply foolish.

Cheers
Marty


The New Orleans disaster is a great example... the poor are just not
important enough to be saved.


--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...

The New Orleans disaster is a great example... the poor are just not
important enough to be saved.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iesXU...eature=related

http://www.cnn.com/US/9511/gimme_shelter/

"Dave" wrote in message
...

Simply pointing out that you're spouting populist nonsense.

Yes, but it does save one the effort of actually having to think.

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 22:59:22 -0500, Marty said:

Now Red Cloud was longer, of steel rather than fiberglass
and engaged in commercial operation, surely of more value than a toy
used for the diversions of the rich?

Um...Marty, how do you throw adjectives like "the rich" into a value
equation. Is there some calculus by which you can determine how much
more a
poor man's boat is worth than that of a rich man?


Ah, now Dave I think you're merely being disingenuous, rather than
merely simple.

Simply pointing out that you're spouting populist nonsense.


No... I think Marty got it about right. You have a long history of being
disingenuous, which begs the questions.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

Dave wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 22:59:22 -0500, Marty said:

Now Red Cloud was longer, of steel rather than fiberglass
and engaged in commercial operation, surely of more value than a toy
used for the diversions of the rich?
Um...Marty, how do you throw adjectives like "the rich" into a value
equation. Is there some calculus by which you can determine how much more a
poor man's boat is worth than that of a rich man?

Ah, now Dave I think you're merely being disingenuous, rather than
merely simple.

Simply pointing out that you're spouting populist nonsense.


You live in a nice world Dave. I suppose that in your world the US
Justice system treats the indigenous and the coloured in the same way it
treats whites and rich?

Cheers
Marty

"Martin Baxter" wrote in message
...

You live in a nice world Dave. I suppose that in your world the US
Justice system treats the indigenous and the coloured in the same way it
treats whites and rich?


The only system in the history of mankind that has treated the most number
of people equally are totalitarian regimes because all freedom and justice
is lacking.

Anonymous wrote:
"Martin Baxter" wrote in message
...
You live in a nice world Dave. I suppose that in your world the US
Justice system treats the indigenous and the coloured in the same way it
treats whites and rich?


The only system in the history of mankind that has treated the most number
of people equally are totalitarian regimes because all freedom and justice
is lacking.




Be that as it may, your point would be?

Cheers
Marty

"Martin Baxter" wrote in message
...
Anonymous wrote:
"Martin Baxter" wrote in message
...
You live in a nice world Dave. I suppose that in your world the US
Justice system treats the indigenous and the coloured in the same way it
treats whites and rich?


The only system in the history of mankind that has treated the most
number of people equally are totalitarian regimes because all freedom and
justice is lacking.


Be that as it may, your point would be?


The counter of your point.

"Martin Baxter" wrote in message
...
Anonymous wrote:
"Martin Baxter" wrote in message
...
You live in a nice world Dave. I suppose that in your world the US
Justice system treats the indigenous and the coloured in the same way it
treats whites and rich?


The only system in the history of mankind that has treated the most
number of people equally are totalitarian regimes because all freedom and
justice is lacking.


Be that as it may, your point would be?

Cheers
Marty


Likely the point on top of the pseudo-intellectual's rather pointy head.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com