Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() OzOne wrote in message ... On Thu, 9 Aug 2007 14:04:14 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard" scribbled thusly: Catamaran designs are inherently dangerous. You shouldn't have to go around tightening bolts to keep your sailboat from falling apart. Wilbur Hubbard Nor even pulling keelbolts regularly...to stop your only method of remaining upright falling to the bottom of the ocean...? That's why Roger MacGregor's so brilliant. Water ballast, man! Two or three hulls in lieu of ballast is really really dumb. There's not a sailing catamaran or trimaran made that's more stable rightside-up than upside-down. Add the stability problem to the fact that leverage factors dictate greater stresses and you're just sacrificing way too much in a lame attempt to avoid a ballast keel. If you fear keel bolts then go with an encapsulated keel. Don't substitute an unstable design. That's retarded. Another option that's much smarter is a monohull such as the likes of an ETAP that uses foam flotation in the hull that makes it unsinkable. People tend to use the dumb excuse that catamarans and tri-marans tend to not sink because of the multiple hulls one of which gets holed doesn't make the whole thing sink. Just more faulty thinking trying to defend an untenable position and unsuitable design. Wilbur Hubbard |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Which boat is most likely to capsize ? | Cruising | |||
You never know where the next capsize is coming from... | Touring | |||
Lessons from a capsize | Touring | |||
Lessons from a capsize | Touring | |||
Lessons from a capsize | Touring |