Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Would denser foam hold up better?
OzOne wrote: Apparentl caused by flex in the skin. It just destroys the foam till the skin fractures and peels back in the worst cases. Hmm. sounds like localized fatigue all right. As the foam goes, the skins gain more & more freedom of movement until the bond fails or they exceed their fatigue limit. Denser foam appears to make no difference, it's just a foam thing. Do you know if anybody has tried using (say for example) 20# foam? All the ones I see are using 8# and 6# for "heavy structural applications." One fairly savvy builder says it makes more sense to use spruce stringers than heavy foam... seen some pretty impressive boats built with laminated wood skins over foam too. IIRC, the bigguns have gone to balsa where cores need to be super strong. Balsa has it's problems too. Good stuff in the right application. Part of the situation is that the buyers of these boats need to recognize that a boat intended to sail hard can only be built so light. But they go with the design/build team that promises the best numbers.... go figure... Hey Bart, if you're still reading this, I would recommend building in some uncored stringers under your deck rather than replacing core. Kind of like the C-beams I put under the super-dinghy's thwarts, if you remember that pic. DSK |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Can 3/8" Balsa Core Go Over 35" Span on Deck Without Structural Bracing? | Boat Building | |||
Balsa deck core | Boat Building | |||
Balsa deck core | Boat Building | |||
Balsa deck core | Boat Building | |||
Penetrating Epoxies in Deck Core Rot - Deck recoring | Cruising |