Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
Macs are just too hard to part with.
I've spent the past two days looking at used Mac26Xs. I've seen about
half a dozen that were advertised for sale by owner. I was hoping to get a real bargain but that seems to be too much to hope for. Why? Well, it's because everybody luvs their Macs. Two of the sellers said they'd rather just keep their Macs than sell them for a low-ball price. One other guy says he buys a couple a year, cleans them up and fits them out and sells them for thousands more than he paid for them. He says he never has to sit on them for more than a month at most and most sell the first week he puts them on the market. I've seen several really choice ones but they wanted more for them than I paid for mine new. That should tell you Mac bashers something. Macs are holding their resale value so it means they keep staying very popular. I bet your heavy keel boat can't make that statement. Compared to a Mac26X they are a bad investiment. -- Cheerio, Ed Gordon http://www.egordon873.homestead.com/drug.html |
#2
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
Macs are just too hard to part with.
On Jun 6, 1:50 pm, Ed Gordon wrote:
I've spent the past two days looking at used Mac26Xs....snip... Here's an idea. This coming presidential election, vote Democratic. With control of two branches of government, Democrats can define "marriage" as being open to any two parties, not just a man and a woman. Then, you can marry your freaking Mac. Thus, the sexual acts you obviously desire to have with your boat will be legal. Frank (I did a lot of LSD in my day but it never made me fall in love with a crappy pseudo-sailboat. Drugs are not as bad as stupidity.) |
#3
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
Macs are just too hard to part with.
On Jun 6, 1:50 pm, Ed Gordon wrote:
I've spent the past two days looking at used Mac26Xs. I've seen about half a dozen that were advertised for sale by owner. I was hoping to get a real bargain but that seems to be too much to hope for. Why? Well, it's because everybody luvs their Macs. Two of the sellers said they'd rather just keep their Macs than sell them for a low-ball price. One other guy says he buys a couple a year, cleans them up and fits them out and sells them for thousands more than he paid for them. He says he never has to sit on them for more than a month at most and most sell the first week he puts them on the market. I've seen several really choice ones but they wanted more for them than I paid for mine new. That should tell you Mac bashers something. Macs are holding their resale value so it means they keep staying very popular. I bet your heavy keel boat can't make that statement. Compared to a Mac26X they are a bad investiment. So: popular = good. Lots of people using them = best choice for everyone good investment = good sailboat and you buy boats for the resale value not for the quality of craftmanship, safety, enjoyment or satisfaction in learning to sail. Got it. Thanks Neal |
#4
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
Macs are just too hard to part with.
Frank wrote in news:1181163978.683261.309630
@n15g2000prd.googlegroups.com: On Jun 6, 1:50 pm, Ed Gordon wrote: I've spent the past two days looking at used Mac26Xs....snip... Here's an idea. This coming presidential election, vote Democratic. With control of two branches of government, Democrats can define "marriage" as being open to any two parties, not just a man and a woman. Then, you can marry your freaking Mac. Thus, the sexual acts you obviously desire to have with your boat will be legal. Frank (I did a lot of LSD in my day but it never made me fall in love with a crappy pseudo-sailboat. Drugs are not as bad as stupidity.) What's your problem, man? Jealous because you don't own a Mac? Well, there's nothing to be jealous for. I used to own a Mac but I sold her and now I'm looking to buy another. I don't think the Mac26M is a better boat than the Mac26X. I don't think there are any multi-purpose boats as good as a Mac26X. I'm entitled to my opinion. If you don't like it why don't you blow it out your ass. You admit you did illegal recreational drugs and you're raggin on me? Man, you need to get a klue! I mighta did drugs but not on purpose. The cult church I got involved with put drugs in my drinks and probably in the food. It made it easier for them to brainwash people and get all they owned bequeethed to the church. Don't be a dope. Don't do drugs. -- Cheerio, Ed Gordon http://www.egordon873.homestead.com/drug.html |
#5
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
Macs are just too hard to part with.
* Ed Gordon wrote, On 6/6/2007 4:50 PM:
I've spent the past two days looking at used Mac26Xs. I've seen about half a dozen that were advertised for sale by owner. I was hoping to get a real bargain but that seems to be too much to hope for. Why? Well, it's because everybody luvs their Macs. Two of the sellers said they'd rather just keep their Macs than sell them for a low-ball price. One other guy says he buys a couple a year, cleans them up and fits them out and sells them for thousands more than he paid for them. He says he never has to sit on them for more than a month at most and most sell the first week he puts them on the market. I've seen several really choice ones but they wanted more for them than I paid for mine new. That should tell you Mac bashers something. Macs are holding their resale value so it means they keep staying very popular. I bet your heavy keel boat can't make that statement. Compared to a Mac26X they are a bad investiment. It tells me there are real idiots buying Macs. I mean, really, if you can make "thousands" of dollars by cleaning the boat, that can only mean that there was one person so disgusted with it he wanted to dump it quickly without even cleaning it, and another person will to pay a premium because it was shiny. |
#6
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
Macs are just too hard to part with.
On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 22:50:13 +0200 (CEST), Ed Gordon
wrote: I've spent the past two days looking at used Mac26Xs. I've seen about half a dozen that were advertised for sale by owner. I was hoping to get a real bargain but that seems to be too much to hope for. Why? Well, it's because everybody luvs their Macs. Two of the sellers said they'd rather just keep their Macs than sell them for a low-ball price. Yeah, they really hold their price. A few likely reasons, in no particular order. Might be out-of-the-box thinking here, since the MacX/M are called "Powersailors," not "Sailboats." 1. Even if the owner gets tired or "sailing," he still has a decently fuel economical and trailerable powerboat, with about the same cabin space of a $75k Bayliner. But about 18'' draft. Leave mast and sails at home. Some do that, and look at it as powerboat only. 2. Macs normally don't have holding tanks/stinking hoses, don't smell like ****, and don't have **** floating in the bilge. 3. You can park it in your yard, and avoid mooring/dock/layup costs. 4. If you decide to go overland, just hook up the trailer and you've got instant Winnebago. 5. They aren't tricked out like a Victorian whorehouse - very little wood and cabinetry to maintain. Some people don't think wood and salt mix. Simple and easily reached electrics. One thru-hull for a sink drain? 6. They are recent - the oldest X is '95, M 2002(?) 7. While Macs are light, glass quality is consistently good, no balsa in the hulls. I wouldn't even bother with a survey on these. 8. They sail at the low end of performance. Some sailors modify them to reach moderate sailing performance in most but light air. Most of the forgoing items are more important than sailing performance to Mac buyers. If they just wanted to sail, they'd get a performing sailboat. There might be more reasons Macs hold their price, but those are the big hitters. Some of those reasons are real attractive to me, but DAMN! I don't have the cash to afford a Mac! I've read quite a bit on the Mac forum, and boy do I envy those guys. Super-cool bunch too. Polite and helpful. One other guy says he buys a couple a year, cleans them up and fits them out and sells them for thousands more than he paid for them. He says he never has to sit on them for more than a month at most and most sell the first week he puts them on the market. I've seen several really choice ones but they wanted more for them than I paid for mine new. That guy was probably lying to you. Lot of that going on. It's just plain difficult to get any good deal on a Mac. But not impossible, so maybe this guy is sharp. That should tell you Mac bashers something. Macs are holding their resale value so it means they keep staying very popular. I bet your heavy keel boat can't make that statement. Compared to a Mac26X they are a bad investiment. Yeah, but some us just don't look at a boat as an "investment." Though I just can't afford a Mac right now, doesn't mean I can't get something cheaper. I can hire a homeless person to pull out all the warped/rotten cabinets, the "sanitary" and electric systems, and clean the **** from the bilges if I go for an older keel boat. But that's only the start on an older cheap boat. And that old keel is still going to keep it from going into the gunkholes where a Mac commonly goes. I don't know, I just don't know. Maybe it's time to visit Capt'n Neal's website for some advice. I think he covers the best methods for a non-wealthy person to buy a boat. He's another polite and helpful guy. Sometimes. --Vic |
#7
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
Macs are just too hard to part with.
* Vic Smith wrote, On 6/7/2007 12:02 AM:
Yeah, they really hold their price. Do they? I just looked a YachtWorld and there were several about 5 years old that were 2/3 the price of a new one - and that includes a trailer and a big engine. This is a myth. A few likely reasons, in no particular order. Might be out-of-the-box thinking here, since the MacX/M are called "Powersailors," not "Sailboats." Yes, its true they have a unique niche, and for some people its a good choice. If you like to drive around the country and power/sail in lakes, it could be nice. 1. Even if the owner gets tired or "sailing," he still has a decently fuel economical and trailerable powerboat, with about the same cabin space of a $75k Bayliner. But about 18'' draft. Leave mast and sails at home. Some do that, and look at it as powerboat only. There are much, much better powerboats, including the Bayliner. And are you sure about that comparison, or are you just parroting someone else's comment? The Bayliner will carry more people further and faster and in much more comfort than the Mac. And it only draws 20". 2. Macs normally don't have holding tanks/stinking hoses, don't smell like ****, and don't have **** floating in the bilge. Are you seriously claiming that having to use a porta-pottie is a major advantage? This is sounding a lot like the mac is the boat for people who never want to use a boat. And didn't the factory have to add an inspection port so you could tell if water was accumulating in the bilge? And wasn't that because the boat would be dangerously unstable with too much bilge water? 3. You can park it in your yard, and avoid mooring/dock/layup costs. True, but how is this different from all of the other trailer boats? 4. If you decide to go overland, just hook up the trailer and you've got instant Winnebago. True, but how is this different from all of the other trailer boats? 5. They aren't tricked out like a Victorian whorehouse - very little wood and cabinetry to maintain. Some people don't think wood and salt mix. Simple and easily reached electrics. One thru-hull for a sink drain? This speaks more to a desire to do limited inland, daysailing. I go out for several weeks at a time, sometimes with guests. We've cruised for a year at a time. Would you want to do that with just a little porta-pottie? Wood is just a matter of style - most boats nowadays have very little outside wood; mine has none. 6. They are recent - the oldest X is '95, M 2002(?) OK. Its pretty funny to see the same broker list a new boat at 37K and a four year old boat at under 22K while you're claiming they "hold their value." 7. While Macs are light, glass quality is consistently good, no balsa in the hulls. I wouldn't even bother with a survey on these. You must be the type of person who always wins at the casino. 8. They sail at the low end of performance. Some sailors modify them to reach moderate sailing performance in most but light air. whatever - certainly there are a few who have stripped them out and sail without ballast, but is this a reason to buy one??? Most of the forgoing items are more important than sailing performance to Mac buyers. If they just wanted to sail, they'd get a performing sailboat. Most of those "advantages" don't hold up to close inspection. With the exception of being able to use the large engine, they are not much different from other trailer sailers, except that the don't sail as nicely. MacGregor did not invent the concept of a simple boat with an outboard engine. There might be more reasons Macs hold their price, but those are the big hitters. I'm sorry, are you really claiming they hold their value because they have a porta-pottie??? Some of those reasons are real attractive to me, but DAMN! I don't have the cash to afford a Mac! Are you sure? I saw some with an asking price under 15K. Without the big engine maybe you could get one for 12. I've read quite a bit on the Mac forum, and boy do I envy those guys. Super-cool bunch too. Polite and helpful. You mean like boaters almost everywhere, except at ASA? One other guy says he buys a couple a year, cleans them up and fits them out and sells them for thousands more than he paid for them. He says he never has to sit on them for more than a month at most and most sell the first week he puts them on the market. I've seen several really choice ones but they wanted more for them than I paid for mine new. That guy was probably lying to you. Lot of that going on. It's just plain difficult to get any good deal on a Mac. But not impossible, so maybe this guy is sharp. Duh! Ed is making this up. If it is Ed. Yeah, but some us just don't look at a boat as an "investment." Though I just can't afford a Mac right now, doesn't mean I can't get something cheaper. I can hire a homeless person to pull out all the warped/rotten cabinets, the "sanitary" and electric systems, and clean the **** from the bilges if I go for an older keel boat. But that's only the start on an older cheap boat. And that old keel is still going to keep it from going into the gunkholes where a Mac commonly goes. If that's where you want to go, you need shallow draft. If you want to sail in the ocean, you'll be happier with a real keel. There are many older trailer sailers that can be had on any budget, if that what you want. You can also get a keel boat pretty cheap that doesn't need to be gutted. I don't know, I just don't know. Maybe it's time to visit Capt'n Neal's website for some advice. I think he covers the best methods for a non-wealthy person to buy a boat. He's another polite and helpful guy. Sometimes. But remember, Neal lost his "unsinkable" boat. |
#8
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
Macs are just too hard to part with.
On Jun 6, 4:50 pm, Ed Gordon wrote:
I've spent the past two days looking at used Mac26Xs. I've seen about half a dozen that were advertised for sale by owner. I was hoping to get a real bargain but that seems to be too much to hope for. Why? Well, it's because everybody luvs their Macs. Two of the sellers said they'd rather just keep their Macs than sell them for a low-ball price. One other guy says he buys a couple a year, cleans them up and fits them out and sells them for thousands more than he paid for them. He says he never has to sit on them for more than a month at most and most sell the first week he puts them on the market. I've seen several really choice ones but they wanted more for them than I paid for mine new. That should tell you Mac bashers something. Macs are holding their resale value so it means they keep staying very popular. I bet your heavy keel boat can't make that statement. Compared to a Mac26X they are a bad investiment. -- Cheerio, Ed Gordonhttp://www.egordon873.homestead.com/drug.html What is nice about them, is people will pay you to take them away. |
#9
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
Macs are just too hard to part with.
On Thu, 07 Jun 2007 09:04:20 -0400, Jeff wrote:
* Vic Smith wrote, On 6/7/2007 12:02 AM: Yeah, they really hold their price. Do they? I just looked a YachtWorld and there were several about 5 years old that were 2/3 the price of a new one - and that includes a trailer and a big engine. This is a myth. May be. But if you look at the prices for some of the older ones, I bet they actually list them at more than they cost new. Remember that anything prior to '95 isn't a X/M. Anyway, the listed price isn't necessarily the real cost, so you may be right. 1. Even if the owner gets tired or "sailing," he still has a decently fuel economical and trailerable powerboat, with about the same cabin space of a $75k Bayliner. But about 18'' draft. Leave mast and sails at home. Some do that, and look at it as powerboat only. There are much, much better powerboats, including the Bayliner. And are you sure about that comparison, or are you just parroting someone else's comment? The Bayliner will carry more people further and faster and in much more comfort than the Mac. And it only draws 20". Yeah, I'm parroting somebody on the Mac group who was looking at Bayliners for boating/weekending with his wife and kids. He did some research, and what he said was all reasonable. It's easy enough to verify. Most of those Bayliners (one of my kids had one) have 350's and are real gas hogs. Never looked myself. 2. Macs normally don't have holding tanks/stinking hoses, don't smell like ****, and don't have **** floating in the bilge. Are you seriously claiming that having to use a porta-pottie is a major advantage? This is sounding a lot like the mac is the boat for people who never want to use a boat. No, just that about every cruising log I've read has multiple instances of plumbing failures and **** fouling the boat. Maybe sailors just don't make good plumbers. Personally, even though I *was* a plumber, I'd probably go with an Airhead, and stow an extra **** tank if necessary. They're expensive, but probably less costly in the long run. And didn't the factory have to add an inspection port so you could tell if water was accumulating in the bilge? And wasn't that because the boat would be dangerously unstable with too much bilge water? Lot's of ways to find something to criticize with any boat. That's one. The stability stuff is overblown. Wood is just a matter of style - most boats nowadays have very little outside wood; mine has none. Some folks just love to spend time rubbing teak. But for anything but a liveaboard I don't like any more wood below than necessary. Darkens the quarters, demands care and covers the mechanicals. For the kind of boat use I have in mind a spartan boat is better. 6. They are recent - the oldest X is '95, M 2002(?) OK. Its pretty funny to see the same broker list a new boat at 37K and a four year old boat at under 22K while you're claiming they "hold their value." That 37K broker price means nothing. What it cost to buy and equip a new boat - Mac or other - isn't a secret. In looking at many ads and reading accounts it seems to me the Mac does real well with resale value, but frankly I haven't priced many boats that are somewhat comparable, because there just aren't many out there. I'd pay a nice premium for a boat that had just simple Mac amenities, gunkholing ability and known good glass, but better sailing performance. I'd like a small diesel myself, since I'm not interested in speeding about. Outside of multi-hulls, a knee-deep anchorage boat with some space aboard will never sail as well as a keel. But they will sail, and are economical to move, if slowly. 8. They sail at the low end of performance. Some sailors modify them to reach moderate sailing performance in most but light air. whatever - certainly there are a few who have stripped them out and sail without ballast, but is this a reason to buy one??? One guy has a custom weighted daggerboard, custom rudders, sails, rigging mods, etc. He keeps the ballast full, since only hot dogs do otherwise because you *will* get knocked down. Don't know what it's cost him, but he's having a lot of fun sailing SF Bay in 30kt air. Points to 45, but an aft quartering sea sometimes knocks him sideways putting him in broach mode. Light boat with no keel, and you can't escape that. Most of those "advantages" don't hold up to close inspection. With the exception of being able to use the large engine, they are not much different from other trailer sailers, except that the don't sail as nicely. MacGregor did not invent the concept of a simple boat with an outboard engine. Yeah, I've heard that before. I clipped a list of trailer sailers names Doug had in a post, and went looking for them. Most were 25-40 years old sitting in backyards with birds nesting in them. But if you've got recommendations for gunkholers I'm all ears. And I'm not keen about trailerable. I might even pay to keep a trailerable waterside so I don't have to haul it around. The trailerables are just commonly gunkholers and relatively inexpensive. If I had my druthers I'd like more beam and length than the trailerables. But trailerables still fit, since my aim is Florida west coast key and sandbar excursions, and some Gulf fishing. Couple weeks at a time. Three weeks max. Are you sure? I saw some with an asking price under 15K. Without the big engine maybe you could get one for 12. That would be great, but I haven't run across that. Anyway, like I remember Capt'n Neal saying on his website - don't pay an arm and a leg for your first sailboat. Good advice. I've read quite a bit on the Mac forum, and boy do I envy those guys. Super-cool bunch too. Polite and helpful. You mean like boaters almost everywhere, except at ASA? heh heh If that's where you want to go, you need shallow draft. If you want to sail in the ocean, you'll be happier with a real keel. There are many older trailer sailers that can be had on any budget, if that what you want. You can also get a keel boat pretty cheap that doesn't need to be gutted. Yep, the shallow draft is tops on my list. Probably will never do any ocean sailing. But who knows? I'm all talk right now. That why I appreciate hearing about sailing from all the real sailors here. Real people, with real sailing experience. Ain't that cool? I don't know, I just don't know. Maybe it's time to visit Capt'n Neal's website for some advice. I think he covers the best methods for a non-wealthy person to buy a boat. He's another polite and helpful guy. Sometimes. But remember, Neal lost his "unsinkable" boat. A mere temporary setback, I'm sure. Like Ed Gordon, he will sail again. --Vic |
#10
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
Macs are just too hard to part with.
* Vic Smith wrote, On 6/8/2007 1:11 AM:
... This is a myth. May be. But if you look at the prices for some of the older ones, I bet they actually list them at more than they cost new. Remember that anything prior to '95 isn't a X/M. Anyway, the listed price isn't necessarily the real cost, so you may be right. The old Macs are a quite different boat. And the value of a "vintage" boat has little to do with its original price - it is determined by how well it was maintained, and how much has to be spent to make it functional. When you buy an old boat you're often really buying and engine and sails, maybe a trailer. Yeah, I'm parroting somebody on the Mac group who was looking at Bayliners for boating/weekending with his wife and kids. He did some research, and what he said was all reasonable. It's easy enough to verify. There is no doubt that some will prefer the styling and layout of the Mac. That's why it make no sense to just copy statements like this. There are some million dollar boats that I think are atrocious, some pocket cruisers that I think are elegant. I'm not a fan of Bayliners, but they are the lap of luxury compared to a Mac. Most of those Bayliners (one of my kids had one) have 350's and are real gas hogs. Never looked myself. There is certainly no doubt of that. But, it depends on how fast and far you go. This is sounding a lot like the mac is the boat for people who never want to use a boat. No, just that about every cruising log I've read has multiple instances of plumbing failures and **** fouling the boat. Maybe sailors just don't make good plumbers. I've had my battles with the head, but that doesn't make the porta-pottie better. And the issue is a bit silly because you can always remove a head and put in a porta-pottie. Personally, even though I *was* a plumber, I'd probably go with an Airhead, and stow an extra **** tank if necessary. They're expensive, but probably less costly in the long run. You seem to be infatuated with new gadgets. Don't rely on an internet comment, find someone who actually has one. From what I've heard, there are issues if its not used regularly. And FWIW, I've never seen a boat with **** in the bilge. I have seen people appalled by someone carrying a porta-pottie through the yacht club looking for a place to dump it. And didn't the factory have to add an inspection port so you could tell if water was accumulating in the bilge? And wasn't that because the boat would be dangerously unstable with too much bilge water? Lot's of ways to find something to criticize with any boat. That's one. The stability stuff is overblown. Actually, I wasn't sure if your "**** in the bilge" comment was meant literally or if you thought the Mac always had a dry bilge because of limited through-hulls. The stability issue with Mac is real, but my real problem with it is that they market the boat to novices who would understand the issue the least. I brought it up only to show that the bilge can accumulate enough water to be a liability. Wood is just a matter of style - most boats nowadays have very little outside wood; mine has none. Some folks just love to spend time rubbing teak. But for anything but a liveaboard I don't like any more wood below than necessary. Darkens the quarters, demands care and covers the mechanicals. For the kind of boat use I have in mind a spartan boat is better. You've described a boat with no mechanicals, so I'm not sure what would be hidden. My boat has lots of wood down below, but it doesn't prevent access to anything - in fact, its the wood lockers that can be easily removed to gain access. Its the glassed in parts that are hard to get to. 6. They are recent - the oldest X is '95, M 2002(?) OK. Its pretty funny to see the same broker list a new boat at 37K and a four year old boat at under 22K while you're claiming they "hold their value." That 37K broker price means nothing. What it cost to buy and equip a new boat - Mac or other - isn't a secret. Indeed - while the dealer price can be negotiated down, it usually cost more to get the boat in the water. A used asking price, however, is often 20% inflated, and any serious issued trigger more negotiation. In looking at many ads and reading accounts it seems to me the Mac does real well with resale value, but frankly I haven't priced many boats that are somewhat comparable, because there just aren't many out there. I'd pay a nice premium for a boat that had just simple Mac amenities, gunkholing ability and known good glass, but better sailing performance. I'd like a small diesel myself, since I'm not interested in speeding about. Outside of multi-hulls, a knee-deep anchorage boat with some space aboard will never sail as well as a keel. But they will sail, and are economical to move, if slowly. Here's my choice for a gunkholer ... therd are many others of the genre. They are pricey new, but there are few issues with a used one. http://www.marshallcat.com/ If I lived on the water and was more interested in short term personal boating than long term family cruising, I would get a Marshall and maybe even something like this: http://www.parkerboats.net/pages/boa....jsp?boatid=18 One guy has a custom weighted daggerboard ... People who hack boats hack the one they have - I doubt this guy bought a new Mac with the intent of "suping it up." There are always people like this, and more power to them. It just doesn't represent an endorsement of the boat. Most of those "advantages" don't hold up to close inspection. With the exception of being able to use the large engine, they are not much different from other trailer sailers, except that the don't sail as nicely. MacGregor did not invent the concept of a simple boat with an outboard engine. Yeah, I've heard that before. I clipped a list of trailer sailers names Doug had in a post, and went looking for them. Most were 25-40 years old sitting in backyards with birds nesting in them. And a lot of them are even MacGregors. That is the fate of old boats. But since these boats have very few systems, a few days with a powerwash will clean them up. Add a new 10hp outboard and you could have a serviceable boat. There are also new boats and middle aged boats out there. But if you've got recommendations for gunkholers I'm all ears. And I'm not keen about trailerable. I might even pay to keep a trailerable waterside so I don't have to haul it around. The trailerables are just commonly gunkholers and relatively inexpensive. If I had my druthers I'd like more beam and length than the trailerables. But trailerables still fit, since my aim is Florida west coast key and sandbar excursions, and some Gulf fishing. Couple weeks at a time. Three weeks max. Well, I have a catamaran, but there are few of those with a low price tag. And my choice for a smaller cruiser would be catboat. But what about all of the swing keel boats out there? There must be plenty that suit your needs. Are you sure? I saw some with an asking price under 15K. Without the big engine maybe you could get one for 12. That would be great, but I haven't run across that. Anyway, like I remember Capt'n Neal saying on his website - don't pay an arm and a leg for your first sailboat. Good advice. That is certainly good advice - its takes owning a few before you understand what you really want in a boat. As for prices, just bring up YachtWorld or Soundings. YW has several under 20K, a few in FL; and Soundings has even more, including a 1995 with an 8Hp for 10K in SC. Another has a 2006 50Hp but no mast for 10K in FL. Yep, the shallow draft is tops on my list. Probably will never do any ocean sailing. But who knows? I'm all talk right now. That why I appreciate hearing about sailing from all the real sailors here. Real people, with real sailing experience. Ain't that cool? Yes, but I'll let you in on a secret. We're all liars! |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Environmentalists vs. boatyards. Part II. Environmentalists fire back! | General | |||
How to build a Hard Bimini & Dodger? | Cruising | |||
1978 4 hp evinrude, hard warm start and needs some TLC | General | |||
Life in Congo, Part V: What a (long) strange trip its being.... | General |