Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#14
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Capt. Rob" wrote in message ups.com... 2006 Mazda MAZDASPEED 6, 5.4 13.9 (C&D Feb '06) Rather leisurely. A 400cc motorcycle will better those figures. Sorry, Bubbles. Now you're being silly. My friend's funny car is faster still. The Mazdaspeed6 made the list of world's fastest sedans and in this hilly terain with rain and snow it's a better car than an M5 for going fast. And even with just a 350 dollar CAI added, the speed6 will drop below 13.5 for a 1/4 mile. I'm going to have to see these claims in the automotive press before I believe them. Sounds highly unrealistic, more like wishful thinking of a new owner. AWD is a must for that kind of driving here. A 330XI is popular around here and for good reason. It's slower than a Speed6, but still a fantastic car. Speed aint the bottom line and the 330XI does a lot of things right. With it's AWD system, the M5 needs a perfect hookup to take the STI and in a variety of road conditions other than ideal (read Real world) the STI will trounce it. And the new Evo is even faster. AWD changes everything in real world driving conditions Don't get me wrong. I love the M5 (I drove a 2005 M3 and it great), but to pretend that these Japanese efforts aren't pushing the envelope is silly. Add to that a few cheap mods (not cheap for an M5) an you have AWD monsters that can take on most any car. Subaru is rumored to be working on a STI model for 2008 that will have 390HP. It'll weigh a LOT less than a M5 and still be AWD. You've grossly overstated the value of AWD. Most competent drivers prefer RWD on the track and on paved roads. There aren't many places in this country where Euro-style rallye cars can outshine the RWD supercars, or even BMW M-cars. I don't push the envelope on dirt or snow/ice. Too risky, and bodywork gets very expensive. Now,,,,,having driven BMW's and Subaru WRX and STI I'll say honestly that I prefer the BMW, but it's not about the engines. Both cars just take a different approach to driving and drivers and no one will agree on which is more fun. But I prefer a car that feels confident when driven hard; a quality missing from the WRX series for me. I find them nervous, though they always seem to do the impossible when driven hard. The BMW, even in a situation where there is only RWD, somehow feels more secure and planted even when it's not. Now when the M5 AWD V10 hits the market (That's what I heard from a buddy at Manhattan BMW), that'll probably be the best sports sedan ever. But for what it'll cost I think I can have more fun in my Speed6 and a new Elise for the same money! Or a Porsche GT3. Almost. Max |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
starting problems (or worse) | General | |||
Senate immigration bill 'far worse' than in '86 | General | |||
So where is...................... | General | |||
( OT ) Creepier than Nixon -- Worse than Watergate | General | |||
Gulf Stream Myths and Worse | Cruising |