Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#29
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Capt. Rob" wrote in message oups.com... It's not a supercar at all. But it is probably the best handling car you can buy for under $100K. The Exige I have on order is a sport version--read: lighter and suspended more for the track. It will probably see as much track mileage as road time. I don't have time for an SCCA campaign, but I can do the occasional track day. Max MAx, I think we have different definitions for Supercar. Handling to me is the biggest element of what makes a car "great." Back in the day my friends and I would laugh at straight line only metal like Grand Nationals and Vettes. First let me state categorically that I don't like Corvettes. Their FRP bodies are a joke, and they rattle miserably after only a few road miles. That said, it's obvious you haven't driven one recently. They are anything but "straight-line only metal." They handle remarkably well, and it takes very little suspension and frame work to prodify one for competitive SCCA racing. Once set up properly they are a bitch to beat. Only the Dodge Viper can compete in that price range. And of course with over 500 bhp, the Corvette is anything but slow or sluggish. In a year or two the Corvette ZO6 will have over 600 bhp. Either they couldn't handle or were very nervous rides on any real twisty that wasn't perfectly smooth. Since the early 90s, the Vettes have been superb handling vehicles. Are you referring to the older models? Some early Vettes (Stingrays, etc.) weren't terribly competent on winding pavement. No matter what power a Mustang had, that fixed rear would always be the achilles heal. Naught but a muscle car. Not great handlers without one hell of a lot of suspension modification. A car like my Speed6 would murder a lot of faster cars with it's refinded handling and quarter miles under 14 seconds is plenty of power for the twisty runs...more than needed perhaps. The Mazdaspeed 6 is indeed a very competent automobile, both on the track and on pavement, but I believe you've greatly overstated its abilties. It is nowhere in the handling league with Vipers, Corvettes, and such. And my forthcoming Exige will outhandle everything we've mentioned so far. The demo Elise I drove--not a sport version, incidentally--simply blew me away. I had to own one. These days there are many cars pulling stock numbers that used to pretty rare. Very true. So for me: if the car handles great and it can do a 1/4 mile in 5 seconds, that's pretty "super." If it can do 165 MPH then it's a done deal. It's governed to do quite a bit less than that. Remove the governor and you can kiss your warranty goodbye. Now there are cars that do 200 MPH and sub 4 second runs and quarters in under 11 seconds. But they are usually not daily drivers. For example, we could not use an STI as a daily driver with it's rally ready setup. Doubtful if anyone could, but properly set up for Euro.rally, it would cost more than all the cars we've mentioned so far, COMBINED. In that regard I would agree that an M5 is fantastic....fast AND liveable day to day. The Elise is the best handling car off the shelf so even without crazy power it's certainly deserving of a supercar ranking. You also have to give it up to the Elise because of the Toyota powerplant will be Miata reliable. Talk about having your cake and eating it too. The Elise (roadster) and Exige (coupe) are not supercars. Handling may be on par with supercars, but they lack the raw horsepower to be supercars. An Exige with, say, 400 bhp, would indeed be a supercar. With the Toyota mill they aren't slow, but they are far from supercar fast. One thing we can agree on...it's a fantastic time to be in love with cars. Even my buddies BMW 330XI (that he bought used for a small sum of 20K) is an amazingly refined car with plenty of fast fun on tap. As you can probably tell I'm an AWD convert, which is why I chose the Mazdaspeed6. I also live in a hilly windy area that can get snowy, so I'd had to show some practicallity! AWD is nice, especially in crap weather. It even does well on the track, if engineered properly. My BMW 330 Ci (coupe, not convertible) obviously doesn't have it, but I think it's a fair trade to have RWD in a BMW as opposed to AWD. I have an additional set of rims with winter ultra-performance tires in addition to the M rims with ultra-performance tires for summer use. Both get me around just fine, and I prefer the RWD for twisty roads. Supercars: Porsche GT3 or McLaren, Ferraris, Aston Martin Vantage, Saleen S7, Ford GT, Dodge Viper, Corvette ZO6, stuff like that. Max |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
starting problems (or worse) | General | |||
Senate immigration bill 'far worse' than in '86 | General | |||
So where is...................... | General | |||
( OT ) Creepier than Nixon -- Worse than Watergate | General | |||
Gulf Stream Myths and Worse | Cruising |