Capt. JG wrote:
"katy" wrote in message
...

Capt. JG wrote:

"katy" wrote in message
...


Dave wrote:


On Thu, 5 Apr 2007 09:54:41 -0700, "Capt. JG"
said:




Along with the Republicans that went with her?


You really aren't smart enough to figure out the difference, are you?
Maybe
that infamous right wing publication I noted earlier -- the Washington
Post
-- can help you sort it out.

I said that already...sort of...



Well, there you go again. Pelosi supposedly lied about a peace
initiative, and that's terrible, but Bushco lying about the reasons for
going to war, that's ok. Yeah, you sort of said that.


No, I didn't say that....becasue I don't believe Bush lied..I think he was
operating on the informatiuon he ahd at the time...and as President, that
is his perogative...Pelosi overstepped...and like I said, I don't think
she lied, I think she jumped the gun diplomatically and misinterpreted a
conversation...I think she is inexperienced in diplomatic discussions and
heard what she wanted to hear..and then acted on it...as SPeaker she
overstepped her postion...she should be censured...



You don't believe Bushco lied, despite all the evidence to the contrary. He
certainly lied about Rumsfeld resigning and admitted as such, but that
doesn't count. She's inexperienced and gets no pass, but the Bush
administration, which has lots of experience, it's ok for them to lie or be
stupid.

Got it.


Totally different scenarios Jon...you've become a very black and white
person, haven't you..white being Democrat, of course, and black being
Repiblican...but no use discussing it with you since you are a scratched
record (remember those) and there's no way to remove the scratches...