New Discoveries?
 

http://space.newscientist.com/articl...ine-news_rss20

I thought the global warming models accounted for all of this.

Lloyd

New Discoveries?
 

Even kids know better:

http://www.longmontfyi.com/Local-Story.asp?id=15357

New Discoveries?
 

"Lloyd Bonafide" wrote in message
...
Even kids know better:

http://www.longmontfyi.com/Local-Story.asp?id=15357



I guess that means even kids are smarter than Al Gore. And to think,
that fat elitist fool was a heartbeat from the Presidency. Scary very
scary!

Wilbur Hubbard

New Discoveries?
 

"Wilbur Hubbard" wrote in message
...

"Lloyd Bonafide" wrote in message
...
Even kids know better:

http://www.longmontfyi.com/Local-Story.asp?id=15357



I guess that means even kids are smarter than Al Gore. And to think, that
fat elitist fool was a heartbeat from the Presidency. Scary very scary!

Even scarier is the thought that he could have been *elected* President. I
don't even want to imagine what this country would be like with him at the
helm.

Max

New Discoveries?
 

"Maxprop" wrote in message
rthlink.net...

"Wilbur Hubbard" wrote in message
...

"Lloyd Bonafide" wrote in message
...
Even kids know better:

http://www.longmontfyi.com/Local-Story.asp?id=15357



I guess that means even kids are smarter than Al Gore. And to think, that
fat elitist fool was a heartbeat from the Presidency. Scary very scary!

Even scarier is the thought that he could have been *elected* President.
I don't even want to imagine what this country would be like with him at
the helm.

Max

Yeah, not fighting in a civil war, Afganistan in good shape, perhaps no 9/11
at all, prosperity, etc.
--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

New Discoveries?
 

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
"Maxprop" wrote in message
rthlink.net...

"Wilbur Hubbard" wrote in message
...

"Lloyd Bonafide" wrote in message
...
Even kids know better:

http://www.longmontfyi.com/Local-Story.asp?id=15357



I guess that means even kids are smarter than Al Gore. And to think,
that fat elitist fool was a heartbeat from the Presidency. Scary very
scary!

Even scarier is the thought that he could have been *elected* President.
I don't even want to imagine what this country would be like with him at
the helm.

Max

Yeah, not fighting in a civil war, Afganistan in good shape, perhaps no
9/11 at all, prosperity, etc.

Right. Dream on, Bay Area boy.

Max

New Discoveries?
 

"Maxprop" wrote in message
thlink.net...

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
"Maxprop" wrote in message
rthlink.net...

"Wilbur Hubbard" wrote in message
...

"Lloyd Bonafide" wrote in message
...
Even kids know better:

http://www.longmontfyi.com/Local-Story.asp?id=15357



I guess that means even kids are smarter than Al Gore. And to think,
that fat elitist fool was a heartbeat from the Presidency. Scary very
scary!

Even scarier is the thought that he could have been *elected* President.
I don't even want to imagine what this country would be like with him at
the helm.

Max

Yeah, not fighting in a civil war, Afganistan in good shape, perhaps no
9/11 at all, prosperity, etc.

Right. Dream on, Bay Area boy.

Max

I notice that you don't dispute any of it.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

New Discoveries?
 

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
"Maxprop" wrote in message
thlink.net...

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
"Maxprop" wrote in message
rthlink.net...

"Wilbur Hubbard" wrote in message
...

"Lloyd Bonafide" wrote in message
...
Even kids know better:

http://www.longmontfyi.com/Local-Story.asp?id=15357



I guess that means even kids are smarter than Al Gore. And to think,
that fat elitist fool was a heartbeat from the Presidency. Scary very
scary!

Even scarier is the thought that he could have been *elected*
President. I don't even want to imagine what this country would be like
with him at the helm.

Max

Yeah, not fighting in a civil war, Afganistan in good shape, perhaps no
9/11 at all, prosperity, etc.

Right. Dream on, Bay Area boy.

Max

I notice that you don't dispute any of it.

I'm disputing all of it. First: Al Gore, if President, would have been
forced to take some sort of action after 9/11 (despite the totally wacko
version of that day circulating among the reaaaaaaallly far-left
currently--which I won't even address, it's so ludicrous). He'd likely have
followed the intel the spooks were putting forth, meaning he'd probably have
retaliated by doing the same thing in Afghanistan that Bush did. If you
recall, Congress was solidly behind that. As for Iraq, things with that
country were coming to a head sooner or later. Al probably would have given
the UN inspectors more time. Maybe not. We'll never know, but I think
Saddam would have been emboldened by bamboozling the UN for so long, and
he'd likely have made overtures to al Qaeda or some other jihadist group,
forcing us (primarily) along with a loose coalition to do something about
him. Of course we'll never know about that either, but that's what some of
the most outspoken university political scientists have been saying for a
while: taking Saddam out was inevitable. As for prosperity, I'm sorry if
you're suffering. Everyone I know is flourishing. You Democrats can spin
our economy into the toilet all day, Jon, but you can't make it believable.
The economy is fine, real estate is doing well--better than the doomspeakers
have been predicting--and the stock market is reaching all-time highs again,
if fluctuating a bit, which is what it typically did before the craziness of
the dot.com era anyway.

Al Gore is, like his President, a flag blowing in the wind of public
opinion. No morality, no backbone, few core beliefs, no real identity
beyond what his handlers created for him. The only firm stance he's taken on
any front is his global warming position, for which many believe him to be
an alarmist and a liar, fabricating "facts" that go well beyond what
scientists are saying or predicting. And lately he's one big fat momma,
leading to the conclusion that he's depressed. Not exactly presidential
material.

Bush is no prize, but Gore would have been a disaster. I shudder to think
... .

Max

New Discoveries?
 

"Maxprop" wrote in message
thlink.net...

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
"Maxprop" wrote in message
thlink.net...

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
"Maxprop" wrote in message
rthlink.net...

"Wilbur Hubbard" wrote in message
...

"Lloyd Bonafide" wrote in message
...
Even kids know better:

http://www.longmontfyi.com/Local-Story.asp?id=15357



I guess that means even kids are smarter than Al Gore. And to think,
that fat elitist fool was a heartbeat from the Presidency. Scary very
scary!

Even scarier is the thought that he could have been *elected*
President. I don't even want to imagine what this country would be
like with him at the helm.

Max

Yeah, not fighting in a civil war, Afganistan in good shape, perhaps no
9/11 at all, prosperity, etc.

Right. Dream on, Bay Area boy.

Max

I notice that you don't dispute any of it.

I'm disputing all of it. First: Al Gore, if President, would have been
forced to take some sort of action after 9/11 (despite the totally wacko

This assumes there would have been a 9/11, which is not a good assumption
since the handoff from one administration to the next would have actually
worked. And, if there had been he wouldn't have been looking stupid reading
My Pet Goat.

version of that day circulating among the reaaaaaaallly far-left
currently--which I won't even address, it's so ludicrous). He'd likely
have followed the intel the spooks were putting forth, meaning he'd
probably have retaliated by doing the same thing in Afghanistan that Bush
did. If you

In Afganistan, yes, EXCEPT, he would have actually used enough military to
get the job done UNLIKE Bush who was really just interested in Saddam...
which is a documented fact.

recall, Congress was solidly behind that. As for Iraq, things with that
country were coming to a head sooner or later. Al probably would have
given the UN inspectors more time. Maybe not. We'll never know, but I
think

Sooner or later? You have a wonderful crystal ball. He would not have rushed
to war, a war of choice.

Saddam would have been emboldened by bamboozling the UN for so long, and
he'd likely have made overtures to al Qaeda or some other jihadist group,
forcing us (primarily) along with a loose coalition to do something about
him. Of course we'll never know about that either, but that's what some
of the most outspoken university political scientists have been saying for
a while: taking Saddam out was inevitable. As for prosperity, I'm sorry
if you're suffering. Everyone I know is flourishing. You Democrats can
spin

You really don't know much about the economy do you. It's lagging, the
housing market is failing... many more poor and malnourished in the country.

our economy into the toilet all day, Jon, but you can't make it
believable. The economy is fine, real estate is doing well--better than
the doomspeakers have been predicting--and the stock market is reaching
all-time highs again, if fluctuating a bit, which is what it typically did
before the craziness of the dot.com era anyway.

So, you don't read the newspaper or watch TV. Get all your news from the
Drudge report?


Al Gore is, like his President, a flag blowing in the wind of public
opinion. No morality, no backbone, few core beliefs, no real identity

Compared to who? Bush??? Haha... sure.

beyond what his handlers created for him. The only firm stance he's taken
on any front is his global warming position, for which many believe him to
be an alarmist and a liar, fabricating "facts" that go well beyond what
scientists are saying or predicting. And lately he's one big fat momma,
leading to the conclusion that he's depressed. Not exactly presidential
material.

Compared to Bush, he's perfect, but that's not saying much.

Bush is no prize....

You get the prize for the understatement of the decade.


--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

New Discoveries?
 

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...

You really don't know much about the economy do you. It's lagging, the
housing market is failing... many more poor and malnourished in the
country.

This is the only response you've made that I have any interest to take issue
with. Fact: the housing market in the Bay Area has tanked, but it was
artificially high to begin with. Here new home starts are up over last year
by double digits. Existing home sales are slighly off, but no moreso than
the normal fluctuation from quarter to quarter. Home prices have stayed the
same or increased slightly, while your Bay Area prices have fallen by 15% to
30%, depending upon whose reference you read. As for the poor and
malnourished, that's Dem spin. Unemployment is around 5% nationally, which
is essentially full employment. I know more about the economy than you,
primarily because I listen to economists, not Democrat doomsayers who will
say anything to make Bush look bad. I really don't know why they try so
hard--he makes himself look bad without their spin. They should sit back
and relax.


So, you don't read the newspaper or watch TV. Get all your news from the
Drudge report?

Nope. I just don't listen to the left-leaning Big Three, CBS, NBS, and ABS.

Max