New Discoveries?
 

In article .net,
Maxprop wrote:

It's the only response you're willing to address, because it's the
only one that's not totally obvious.

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...

You really don't know much about the economy do you. It's lagging, the
housing market is failing... many more poor and malnourished in the
country.

This is the only response you've made that I have any interest to take issue
with. Fact: the housing market in the Bay Area has tanked, but it was
artificially high to begin with. Here new home starts are up over last year
by double digits. Existing home sales are slighly off, but no moreso than

Firstly, I never said anything about the SF bayarea. Secondly, just
about every economist and/or realtor (if they're being honest, which I
know can be a stretch for some) recognizes that the housing market is
depressed and will continue to be so until 2009.

the normal fluctuation from quarter to quarter. Home prices have stayed the
same or increased slightly, while your Bay Area prices have fallen by 15% to
30%, depending upon whose reference you read. As for the poor and
malnourished, that's Dem spin. Unemployment is around 5% nationally, which

According to you, but not according to all the statistics
available. We have many more people at or below the poverty line, and
the situation is getting worse. Feel free to blame the Dems, but the
Republicans have been in charge for 7 years.

is essentially full employment. I know more about the economy than you,
primarily because I listen to economists, not Democrat doomsayers who will
say anything to make Bush look bad. I really don't know why they try so
hard--he makes himself look bad without their spin. They should sit back
and relax.

They don't really have to say or do much to make him look bad. He's
quite capable of doing that himself. Maybe he should use McGovern's
famous line about being 1000 percent behind the AG. He lied about
being behind Rumsfeld even though he knew the resignation was in the
works.

So, you don't read the newspaper or watch TV. Get all your news from the
Drudge report?

Nope. I just don't listen to the left-leaning Big Three, CBS, NBS, and ABS.

Oops. They're all huge US corps, controlled by right-wing
loyalists. They must be just unpatriotic!

--
Capt. JG @@
www.sailnow.com

New Discoveries?
 

Jonathan Ganz wrote:
In article .net,
Maxprop wrote:

It's the only response you're willing to address, because it's the
only one that's not totally obvious.


"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...


You really don't know much about the economy do you. It's lagging, the
housing market is failing... many more poor and malnourished in the
country.

This is the only response you've made that I have any interest to take issue
with. Fact: the housing market in the Bay Area has tanked, but it was
artificially high to begin with. Here new home starts are up over last year
by double digits. Existing home sales are slighly off, but no moreso than


Firstly, I never said anything about the SF bayarea. Secondly, just
about every economist and/or realtor (if they're being honest, which I
know can be a stretch for some) recognizes that the housing market is
depressed and will continue to be so until 2009.


the normal fluctuation from quarter to quarter. Home prices have stayed the
same or increased slightly, while your Bay Area prices have fallen by 15% to
30%, depending upon whose reference you read. As for the poor and
malnourished, that's Dem spin. Unemployment is around 5% nationally, which


According to you, but not according to all the statistics
available. We have many more people at or below the poverty line, and
the situation is getting worse. Feel free to blame the Dems, but the
Republicans have been in charge for 7 years.


is essentially full employment. I know more about the economy than you,
primarily because I listen to economists, not Democrat doomsayers who will
say anything to make Bush look bad. I really don't know why they try so
hard--he makes himself look bad without their spin. They should sit back
and relax.


They don't really have to say or do much to make him look bad. He's
quite capable of doing that himself. Maybe he should use McGovern's
famous line about being 1000 percent behind the AG. He lied about
being behind Rumsfeld even though he knew the resignation was in the
works.

So, you don't read the newspaper or watch TV. Get all your news from the
Drudge report?

Nope. I just don't listen to the left-leaning Big Three, CBS, NBS, and ABS.


Oops. They're all huge US corps, controlled by right-wing
loyalists. They must be just unpatriotic!

http://www.frbsf.org/publications/ec...ews/index.html
Yeah..there's an imminent Depression starting up in San Francisco...right...

New Discoveries?
 

In article ,
katy wrote:

http://www.frbsf.org/publications/ec...ews/index.html
Yeah..there's an imminent Depression starting up in San Francisco...right...

Never used the word depression.... interesting that you did. g

Interesting article.

--
Capt. JG @@
www.sailnow.com

New Discoveries?
 

Jonathan Ganz wrote:
In article ,
katy wrote:

http://www.frbsf.org/publications/ec...ews/index.html
Yeah..there's an imminent Depression starting up in San Francisco...right...


Never used the word depression.... interesting that you did. g

Interesting article.

Yeah..it mostly refutes what you were saying...or seriously diminishes
what you were saying...

New Discoveries?
 

In article ,
katy wrote:
Jonathan Ganz wrote:
In article ,
katy wrote:

http://www.frbsf.org/publications/ec...ews/index.html
Yeah..there's an imminent Depression starting up in San Francisco...right...


Never used the word depression.... interesting that you did. g

Interesting article.

Yeah..it mostly refutes what you were saying...or seriously diminishes
what you were saying...

I was thinking it actually supports it. I think you need to read it
again.


--
Capt. JG @@
www.sailnow.com

New Discoveries?
 

Jonathan Ganz wrote:
In article ,
katy wrote:

Jonathan Ganz wrote:

In article ,
katy wrote:


http://www.frbsf.org/publications/ec...ews/index.html
Yeah..there's an imminent Depression starting up in San Francisco...right...


Never used the word depression.... interesting that you did. g

Interesting article.


Yeah..it mostly refutes what you were saying...or seriously diminishes
what you were saying...


I was thinking it actually supports it. I think you need to read it
again.


From memory didn't it say unemployment was less than 5% and that
although sloppy, the housing market was pretty much stable? And that
durable goods were doing fine? A less than 5% unemployment rate means
the employable are employed...people buying durable goods means they
have the money to do so or the credit, and the hosuing market has been
so overinflated nationwide that it was due to take a decline just to
even itself out..speculation building has been going on for quite some
time and now new real estate isn't the commodity it was...

New Discoveries?
 

In article ,
katy wrote:
From memory didn't it say unemployment was less than 5% and that
although sloppy, the housing market was pretty much stable? And that
durable goods were doing fine? A less than 5% unemployment rate means
the employable are employed...people buying durable goods means they
have the money to do so or the credit, and the hosuing market has been
so overinflated nationwide that it was due to take a decline just to
even itself out..speculation building has been going on for quite some
time and now new real estate isn't the commodity it was...

No, it didn't say that. You should probably read it again. That's why
I found it interesting.


--
Capt. JG @@
www.sailnow.com

New Discoveries?
 

In article ,
Dave wrote:
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 14:55:06 -0400, katy said:

From memory didn't it say unemployment was less than 5% and that
although sloppy, the housing market was pretty much stable? And that
durable goods were doing fine?

Jon's hilarious. He's been claiming the economy is in the crapper constantly
since at least 2002.

Inflation is heading up, unless you don't believe the Fed any more.


--
Capt. JG @@
www.sailnow.com

New Discoveries?
 

Dave wrote:
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 14:55:06 -0400, katy said:


From memory didn't it say unemployment was less than 5% and that
although sloppy, the housing market was pretty much stable? And that
durable goods were doing fine?


Jon's hilarious. He's been claiming the economy is in the crapper constantly
since at least 2002.

He obviously interpreted the article the same way some people interpret
the Bible...

New Discoveries?
 

In article ,
katy wrote:
Dave wrote:
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 14:55:06 -0400, katy said:


From memory didn't it say unemployment was less than 5% and that
although sloppy, the housing market was pretty much stable? And that
durable goods were doing fine?


Jon's hilarious. He's been claiming the economy is in the crapper constantly
since at least 2002.

He obviously interpreted the article the same way some people interpret
the Bible...

So, you refuse to read it again.... ok.

--
Capt. JG @@
www.sailnow.com