Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Nathan Branden" wrote in message ... I've been tempted to use the stainless steel bathroom handrails on my cabintop. They are those handrails you see in Lowes or Home Depot, pretty sturdy bent tubing with only two welds. How will they stand up in a marine environment? They definitely long strong enough and mount over a wide area. I just think the boat store handrails are outrageously expensive and the bathroom ones a much less expensive and even look better. Nathan Nathan, If you own or sail a properly designed sailboat you need no hand rails on the cabin top. Hand rails are used only on sailboats that have side decks. A proper sailboat has a flush or raised deck. Instead of walking precariously along the side decks, on a proper sailboat you walk on top of the flush or raised deck. Here is a picture of a proper raised deck sailboat. http://www.sailboatlistings.com/sailimg/6070/SJ2003.jpg and here's another http://captneal.homestead.com/files/stbsd.jpg Note the total absence of unsightly hand rails. Wilbur Hubbard |
#2
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 2, 12:52 pm, "Wilbur Hubbard"
wrote: "Nathan Branden" wrote in message ... I've been tempted to use the stainless steel bathroom handrails on my cabintop. They are those handrails you see in Lowes or Home Depot, pretty sturdy bent tubing with only two welds. How will they stand up in a marine environment? They definitely long strong enough and mount over a wide area. I just think the boat store handrails are outrageously expensive and the bathroom ones a much less expensive and even look better. Nathan Nathan, If you own or sail a properly designed sailboat you need no hand rails on the cabin top. Hand rails are used only on sailboats that have side decks. A proper sailboat has a flush or raised deck. Instead of walking precariously along the side decks, on a proper sailboat you walk on top of the flush or raised deck. Here is a picture of a proper raised deck sailboat. http://www.sailboatlistings.com/sailimg/6070/SJ2003.jpg and here's another http://captneal.homestead.com/files/stbsd.jpg Note the total absence of unsightly hand rails. Wilbur Hubbard Is this an inproperly designed boat Wilbur? http://images.google.com/imgres?imgu...3Doff%26sa%3DG |
#3
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Joe" wrote in message ups.com... On Mar 2, 12:52 pm, "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote: "Nathan Branden" wrote in message ... I've been tempted to use the stainless steel bathroom handrails on my cabintop. They are those handrails you see in Lowes or Home Depot, pretty sturdy bent tubing with only two welds. How will they stand up in a marine environment? They definitely long strong enough and mount over a wide area. I just think the boat store handrails are outrageously expensive and the bathroom ones a much less expensive and even look better. Nathan Nathan, If you own or sail a properly designed sailboat you need no hand rails on the cabin top. Hand rails are used only on sailboats that have side decks. A proper sailboat has a flush or raised deck. Instead of walking precariously along the side decks, on a proper sailboat you walk on top of the flush or raised deck. Here is a picture of a proper raised deck sailboat. http://www.sailboatlistings.com/sailimg/6070/SJ2003.jpg and here's another http://captneal.homestead.com/files/stbsd.jpg Note the total absence of unsightly hand rails. Wilbur Hubbard Is this an inproperly designed boat Wilbur? http://images.google.com/imgres?imgu...3Doff%26sa%3DG The Oyster 68 is a competent yacht. However, it would be a better and more seaworthy yacht if they made it a flush deck or a raised deck. On a sailboat that size a flush deck would be the answer because it is large enough to have plenty of headroom. A flush deck is much more practical, it's easier to clean and move about on. Corners and stressed areas are eliminated. It has less windage thus it would go to weather better. It's lighter. So, to answer your question it is, indeed, improperly designed. If they make a flush deck version then that would be proper and Bristol. That particular Oyster 68 is style over substance and practicality. Wilbur Hubbard |
#4
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 2, 1:19 pm, "Wilbur Hubbard"
wrote: "Joe" wrote in message ups.com... On Mar 2, 12:52 pm, "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote: "Nathan Branden" wrote in message . .. I've been tempted to use the stainless steel bathroom handrails on my cabintop. They are those handrails you see in Lowes or Home Depot, pretty sturdy bent tubing with only two welds. How will they stand up in a marine environment? They definitely long strong enough and mount over a wide area. I just think the boat store handrails are outrageously expensive and the bathroom ones a much less expensive and even look better. Nathan Nathan, If you own or sail a properly designed sailboat you need no hand rails on the cabin top. Hand rails are used only on sailboats that have side decks. A proper sailboat has a flush or raised deck. Instead of walking precariously along the side decks, on a proper sailboat you walk on top of the flush or raised deck. Here is a picture of a proper raised deck sailboat. http://www.sailboatlistings.com/sailimg/6070/SJ2003.jpg and here's another http://captneal.homestead.com/files/stbsd.jpg Note the total absence of unsightly hand rails. Wilbur Hubbard Is this an inproperly designed boat Wilbur? http://images.google.com/imgres?imgu...rmarine.com/im... The Oyster 68 is a competent yacht. However, it would be a better and more seaworthy yacht if they made it a flush deck or a raised deck. On a sailboat that size a flush deck would be the answer because it is large enough to have plenty of headroom. A flush deck is much more practical, it's easier to clean and move about on. Corners and stressed areas are eliminated. It has less windage thus it would go to weather better. It's lighter. So, to answer your question it is, indeed, improperly designed. If they make a flush deck version then that would be proper and Bristol. That particular Oyster 68 is style over substance and practicality. Wilbur Hubbard- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - What about this 40 footer is it another messed up design? http://www.theyachtmarket.com/userimages/55213.jpg |
#5
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Joe" wrote in message ps.com... On Mar 2, 1:19 pm, "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote: "Joe" wrote in message ups.com... On Mar 2, 12:52 pm, "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote: "Nathan Branden" wrote in message . .. I've been tempted to use the stainless steel bathroom handrails on my cabintop. They are those handrails you see in Lowes or Home Depot, pretty sturdy bent tubing with only two welds. How will they stand up in a marine environment? They definitely long strong enough and mount over a wide area. I just think the boat store handrails are outrageously expensive and the bathroom ones a much less expensive and even look better. Nathan Nathan, If you own or sail a properly designed sailboat you need no hand rails on the cabin top. Hand rails are used only on sailboats that have side decks. A proper sailboat has a flush or raised deck. Instead of walking precariously along the side decks, on a proper sailboat you walk on top of the flush or raised deck. Here is a picture of a proper raised deck sailboat. http://www.sailboatlistings.com/sailimg/6070/SJ2003.jpg and here's another http://captneal.homestead.com/files/stbsd.jpg Note the total absence of unsightly hand rails. Wilbur Hubbard Is this an inproperly designed boat Wilbur? http://images.google.com/imgres?imgu...rmarine.com/im... The Oyster 68 is a competent yacht. However, it would be a better and more seaworthy yacht if they made it a flush deck or a raised deck. On a sailboat that size a flush deck would be the answer because it is large enough to have plenty of headroom. A flush deck is much more practical, it's easier to clean and move about on. Corners and stressed areas are eliminated. It has less windage thus it would go to weather better. It's lighter. So, to answer your question it is, indeed, improperly designed. If they make a flush deck version then that would be proper and Bristol. That particular Oyster 68 is style over substance and practicality. Wilbur Hubbard- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - What about this 40 footer is it another messed up design? http://www.theyachtmarket.com/userimages/55213.jpg Let's just say it is a "poor" design. For one thing heavy teak on the deck raises the CG and is a maintenance nightmare. Get rid of it. For the second thing construct the house the full width of the hull. Get rid of the side decks. They are totally unnecessary. Better to have the room inside than sacrifice layout options for side decks that only force a crewman to walk closer to where he will be washed or knocked overboard. Wilbur Hubbard |
#6
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 2, 1:49 pm, "Wilbur Hubbard"
wrote: "Joe" wrote in message ps.com... On Mar 2, 1:19 pm, "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote: "Joe" wrote in message roups.com... On Mar 2, 12:52 pm, "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote: "Nathan Branden" wrote in message . .. I've been tempted to use the stainless steel bathroom handrails on my cabintop. They are those handrails you see in Lowes or Home Depot, pretty sturdy bent tubing with only two welds. How will they stand up in a marine environment? They definitely long strong enough and mount over a wide area. I just think the boat store handrails are outrageously expensive and the bathroom ones a much less expensive and even look better. Nathan Nathan, If you own or sail a properly designed sailboat you need no hand rails on the cabin top. Hand rails are used only on sailboats that have side decks. A proper sailboat has a flush or raised deck. Instead of walking precariously along the side decks, on a proper sailboat you walk on top of the flush or raised deck. Here is a picture of a proper raised deck sailboat. http://www.sailboatlistings.com/sailimg/6070/SJ2003.jpg and here's another http://captneal.homestead.com/files/stbsd.jpg Note the total absence of unsightly hand rails. Wilbur Hubbard Is this an inproperly designed boat Wilbur? http://images.google.com/imgres?imgu...rmarine.com/im... The Oyster 68 is a competent yacht. However, it would be a better and more seaworthy yacht if they made it a flush deck or a raised deck. On a sailboat that size a flush deck would be the answer because it is large enough to have plenty of headroom. A flush deck is much more practical, it's easier to clean and move about on. Corners and stressed areas are eliminated. It has less windage thus it would go to weather better. It's lighter. So, to answer your question it is, indeed, improperly designed. If they make a flush deck version then that would be proper and Bristol. That particular Oyster 68 is style over substance and practicality. Wilbur Hubbard- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - What about this 40 footer is it another messed up design? http://www.theyachtmarket.com/userimages/55213.jpg Let's just say it is a "poor" design. For one thing heavy teak on the deck raises the CG and is a maintenance nightmare. Get rid of it. For the second thing construct the house the full width of the hull. Get rid of the side decks. They are totally unnecessary. Better to have the room inside than sacrifice layout options for side decks that only force a crewman to walk closer to where he will be washed or knocked overboard. Wilbur Hubbard- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - So you think an Oyster 40 is a poor design...bwahahahahahahahaaa, you would rather sail Cut the cheese? Joe |
#7
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote in message ... "Nathan Branden" wrote in message ... I've been tempted to use the stainless steel bathroom handrails on my cabintop. They are those handrails you see in Lowes or Home Depot, pretty sturdy bent tubing with only two welds. How will they stand up in a marine environment? They definitely long strong enough and mount over a wide area. I just think the boat store handrails are outrageously expensive and the bathroom ones a much less expensive and even look better. Nathan Nathan, If you own or sail a properly designed sailboat you need no hand rails on the cabin top. Hand rails are used only on sailboats that have side decks. A proper sailboat has a flush or raised deck. Instead of walking precariously along the side decks, on a proper sailboat you walk on top of the flush or raised deck. Here is a picture of a proper raised deck sailboat. http://www.sailboatlistings.com/sailimg/6070/SJ2003.jpg and here's another http://captneal.homestead.com/files/stbsd.jpg Note the total absence of unsightly hand rails. Wilbur Hubbard You are risking your life if you ever need to go forward on either of those boats in a real blow. |
#8
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Edgar" wrote in message ... "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote in message ... "Nathan Branden" wrote in message ... I've been tempted to use the stainless steel bathroom handrails on my cabintop. They are those handrails you see in Lowes or Home Depot, pretty sturdy bent tubing with only two welds. How will they stand up in a marine environment? They definitely long strong enough and mount over a wide area. I just think the boat store handrails are outrageously expensive and the bathroom ones a much less expensive and even look better. Nathan Nathan, If you own or sail a properly designed sailboat you need no hand rails on the cabin top. Hand rails are used only on sailboats that have side decks. A proper sailboat has a flush or raised deck. Instead of walking precariously along the side decks, on a proper sailboat you walk on top of the flush or raised deck. Here is a picture of a proper raised deck sailboat. http://www.sailboatlistings.com/sailimg/6070/SJ2003.jpg and here's another http://captneal.homestead.com/files/stbsd.jpg Note the total absence of unsightly hand rails. Wilbur Hubbard You are risking your life if you ever need to go forward on either of those boats in a real blow. In a real blow, real sailors use safety harnesses and jacklines. A single jackline down the center of a yacht is safer than two jacklines down the side decks of a yacht. It would not be very difficult to get flipped over the low lifelines and be drug though the water by your safety line on the side decks. Walking in the center of the boat keeps you on the boat. Wilbur Hubbard |
#9
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote in message ... In a real blow, real sailors use safety harnesses and jacklines. A single jackline down the center of a yacht is safer than two jacklines down the side decks of a yacht. It would not be very difficult to get flipped over the low lifelines and be drug though the water by your safety line on the side decks. Walking in the center of the boat keeps you on the boat. Wilbur Hubbard The question was guard rails not jacklines. But for jacklines the safety factor is determined by the length of the line you use to tether yourself to the jackline. Here there is a problem because a short safety line is better for getting forward but once you are there it may impose limits on the work you need to do. For this reason the best solution is to have both a short and a longer safety line on your lifevest. Depending on the design of the boat and whether you have a large dodger in the way or not the problem with a single central jackline is how you can clip onto it before you leave the safety of the cockpit. But guard rails are a necessary safety factor for any offshore yacht. Do you think you just stroll forward in a force 8 blow? Of course you do not- you can be reduced to almost crawling from one handhold to another and you are better off clipping onto a jackline on the weather side deck with a short line before you leave the cockpit than trying to reach round the dodger to clip onto a central jackline with what has necessarily got to be a longer safety line. I favour a jackline on each side going forward as far as the mast and then a single central one going right to the bow. No problem changing from one to the other if you have two safety lines as I mentioned above.. |
#10
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Edgar" wrote in message ... "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote in message ... In a real blow, real sailors use safety harnesses and jacklines. A single jackline down the center of a yacht is safer than two jacklines down the side decks of a yacht. It would not be very difficult to get flipped over the low lifelines and be drug though the water by your safety line on the side decks. Walking in the center of the boat keeps you on the boat. Wilbur Hubbard The question was guard rails not jacklines. But for jacklines the safety factor is determined by the length of the line you use to tether yourself to the jackline. Here there is a problem because a short safety line is better for getting forward but once you are there it may impose limits on the work you need to do. For this reason the best solution is to have both a short and a longer safety line on your lifevest. Depending on the design of the boat and whether you have a large dodger in the way or not the problem with a single central jackline is how you can clip onto it before you leave the safety of the cockpit. But guard rails are a necessary safety factor for any offshore yacht. Do you think you just stroll forward in a force 8 blow? Of course you do not- you can be reduced to almost crawling from one handhold to another and you are better off clipping onto a jackline on the weather side deck with a short line before you leave the cockpit than trying to reach round the dodger to clip onto a central jackline with what has necessarily got to be a longer safety line. I favour a jackline on each side going forward as far as the mast and then a single central one going right to the bow. No problem changing from one to the other if you have two safety lines as I mentioned above.. You're correct. When the going gets really rough everybody crawls from handhold to handhold. You cannot stand up at all. I always feel safer crawling forward in the center of the boat. That means forget the dodger. A well designed yacht does not need a dodger to begin with. They are just another "monkey see, monkey do" yachty gimmick. The next time I see somebody in bodily contortions trying to look over a dodger, I'm going to hurl. The things are dangerous. If you're afraid of a little spray then stay home for Pete's sake. I prefer a single jackline down the center. I run mine to on the starboard side of mast down the center. No stupid dodger to dodge. Just clip on in the cockpit, move up and atop of the house and move (crawl or walk according to the conditions) forward. If I expect really rough weather I zig-zag lines horizontally between the aft lower/upper/forward lower shrouds which makes sort of a cage for working the mast winch main and jib halyards at the mast. Moving forward to change head sails is no problem even in the roughest of weather when on all-fours. I like a short life line on the harness. I don't want to fly six feet and flip over the side. Lifeline height seems calculated to cut you off at the knees anyway and flip a body right over the side. If I were to design a larger boat, say sixty feet or so, I would make it a raised deck model but I'd build in a walkway right down the center of the deck. Maybe three feet deep with two foot high lifelines or railings on either side of it. This would go all the way to the bow with a circular area at the mast. You could walk from the cockpit to the mast to the foredeck in comfort, safety and style. The companionway would be to one side, of course. Steps up to the walkway would be molded into the bulkhead up from the bridge deck. Wilbur Hubbard |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Cheapo Handrails | ASA | |||
Cheapo Handrails | ASA | |||
Backstay, cheapo workmanship! | ASA | |||
El Cheapo GPS Receiver | General | |||
El Cheapo GPS Receiver | General |