Who are you gonna listen to?
 

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 18:29:24 -0800, "Capt. JG"
said:

Er.... Dave, Hillary didn't get away with anything. Her trial by fire
in
the
public eye from the likes of the right-wing nuts was BY FAR more
intense
than anything Steward went through. And, for all the noise and all the
smoke
and all the shouting, not one prosecution. Hillary didn't get away with
anything. Steward was a thief and a liar and not too bright.

Ah, so you too believe in immaculate generation. That explains a lot.

Who's Steward?


You're ranting Dave. You need to chill. You know who I meant despite the
typo.

Unusual to make the same typo twice in one short paragraph.


Well, I'm an usual gay.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

Who are you gonna listen to?
 

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 18:30:21 -0800, "Capt. JG"
attempted pathetically to bob and weave:

So Hillary didn't really tell that fairy tale about the immaculately
generated billing records showing up in the library?


And this is important because?

So Hillary didn't really tell that fairy tale about the immaculately
generated billing records showing up in the library?


Keep saying it Dave.. a couple of dozen more times should do it.

Really? Could have fooled me, since you apparently have no intention of
answering his question.

Max

Who are you gonna listen to?
 

"Maxprop" wrote in message
hlink.net...

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 08 Feb 2007 22:11:30 -0500, katy said:

What you don't understand is geoglofical and climatical history...100
years is a nothing..

Jon has hockey stick on the brain, Katy


Dave is full of... no, I'm not going to say it.

For a moment there I thought you were going to tell him to puck off.

Max



Now that's really hocky.


--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

Who are you gonna listen to?
 

"Maxprop" wrote in message
link.net...

"Capt. JG" wrote in message

You don't know the facts. The facts are that the rate of climate warming
has increased dramatically in the last 100 years or so, far more than can
be explained by the normal cycle of hot/cold.

What's "dramatically" Jon? Give us some numbers. Careful--I have the
facts, so don't make something up.

In addition, the increase in human population has prevented such things
as normal relocation of plants and animals through what would be normal
migration patterns. This is not a long term trend. This is a dramatic
increase in the RATE of change, not something that has been seen in the
previous millions of years.

There definitely are too many people on the globe, and wildlife (both
botanical and zoological) habitats are becoming eliminated and scarce in
many zones. But only computer models can predict the effect of such
things, and those models are often tainted by the agenda of those who
design them.

Max



I'd point you to the website, but I think you can find it yourself... think
Al Gore.


--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

Who are you gonna listen to?
 

"Maxprop" wrote in message
hlink.net...

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 18:28:10 -0800, "Capt. JG"
said:

How was he an asshole? He was VP for crissake.

Ergo being an asshole and being VP are mutually exclusive?

That's what I was wondering.

Max



Yes, I know.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

Who are you gonna listen to?
 

"Maxprop" wrote in message
hlink.net...

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 18:30:21 -0800, "Capt. JG"
attempted pathetically to bob and weave:

So Hillary didn't really tell that fairy tale about the immaculately
generated billing records showing up in the library?


And this is important because?

So Hillary didn't really tell that fairy tale about the immaculately
generated billing records showing up in the library?


Keep saying it Dave.. a couple of dozen more times should do it.

Really? Could have fooled me, since you apparently have no intention of
answering his question.

Max



Only after he says it a couple of dozen more times. That'll make it real.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

Who are you gonna listen to?
 

Maxprop wrote:


The point is that you choose to believe that the majority of meteorological
researchers are on board with your belief, but that simply isn't supported
by fact. Feel free to prove me wrong with more than just your opinion.

From your favourite network:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,249659,00.html

From your favourite government, "Sharon Hays, associate director of the
Office of Science and Technology Policy at the White House, welcomed the
strong language of the report.", if Bush's people say it's so, it must
be!

Cheers
Marty (Who would appreciate a little GW right now, it's frickin cold
outside)
------------ And now a word from our sponsor ----------------------
For a quality mail server, try SurgeMail, easy to install,
fast, efficient and reliable. Run a million users on a standard
PC running NT or Unix without running out of power, use the best!
---- See http://netwinsite.com/sponsor/sponsor_surgemail.htm ----

Who are you gonna listen to?
 

"Martin Baxter" wrote in message
...
Maxprop wrote:


The point is that you choose to believe that the majority of
meteorological
researchers are on board with your belief, but that simply isn't
supported
by fact. Feel free to prove me wrong with more than just your opinion.

From your favourite network:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,249659,00.html

From your favourite government, "Sharon Hays, associate director of the
Office of Science and Technology Policy at the White House, welcomed the
strong language of the report.", if Bush's people say it's so, it must
be!

Cheers
Marty (Who would appreciate a little GW right now, it's frickin cold
outside)
------------ And now a word from our sponsor ----------------------
For a quality mail server, try SurgeMail, easy to install,
fast, efficient and reliable. Run a million users on a standard
PC running NT or Unix without running out of power, use the best!
---- See http://netwinsite.com/sponsor/sponsor_surgemail.htm ----


Don't believe it Max. It feels better not to believe it.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

Who are you gonna listen to?
 

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 20:15:59 -0800, "Capt. JG"
said:

Then you'll be willing to answer the question?

Of course.

See below. So what's the answer, Jon? Inquiring minds want to know.

So Hillary didn't really tell that fairy tale about the immaculately
generated billing records showing up in the library?
So Hillary didn't really tell that fairy tale about the immaculately
generated billing records showing up in the library?
So Hillary didn't really tell that fairy tale about the immaculately
generated billing records showing up in the library?
So Hillary didn't really tell that fairy tale about the immaculately
generated billing records showing up in the library?
So Hillary didn't really tell that fairy tale about the immaculately
generated billing records showing up in the library?
So Hillary didn't really tell that fairy tale about the immaculately
generated billing records showing up in the library?
So Hillary didn't really tell that fairy tale about the immaculately
generated billing records showing up in the library?
So Hillary didn't really tell that fairy tale about the immaculately
generated billing records showing up in the library?
So Hillary didn't really tell that fairy tale about the immaculately
generated billing records showing up in the library?
So Hillary didn't really tell that fairy tale about the immaculately
generated billing records showing up in the library?
So Hillary didn't really tell that fairy tale about the immaculately
generated billing records showing up in the library?
So Hillary didn't really tell that fairy tale about the immaculately
generated billing records showing up in the library?
So Hillary didn't really tell that fairy tale about the immaculately
generated billing records showing up in the library?
So Hillary didn't really tell that fairy tale about the immaculately
generated billing records showing up in the library?
So Hillary didn't really tell that fairy tale about the immaculately
generated billing records showing up in the library?
So Hillary didn't really tell that fairy tale about the immaculately
generated billing records showing up in the library?
So Hillary didn't really tell that fairy tale about the immaculately
generated billing records showing up in the library?
So Hillary didn't really tell that fairy tale about the immaculately
generated billing records showing up in the library?
So Hillary didn't really tell that fairy tale about the immaculately
generated billing records showing up in the library?
So Hillary didn't really tell that fairy tale about the immaculately
generated billing records showing up in the library?
So Hillary didn't really tell that fairy tale about the immaculately
generated billing records showing up in the library?
So Hillary didn't really tell that fairy tale about the immaculately
generated billing records showing up in the library?
So Hillary didn't really tell that fairy tale about the immaculately
generated billing records showing up in the library?
So Hillary didn't really tell that fairy tale about the immaculately
generated billing records showing up in the library?
So Hillary didn't really tell that fairy tale about the immaculately
generated billing records showing up in the library?
So Hillary didn't really tell that fairy tale about the immaculately
generated billing records showing up in the library?


I said a few dozen. Do you need to retake a math class?

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

Who are you gonna listen to?
 

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 9 Feb 2007 09:09:40 -0800, "Capt. JG"
said:

I said a few dozen. Do you need to retake a math class?

Your nose is growing, Jon. You said a couple of dozen. See Message-ID:
A couple means two.

Are you finding yourself becoming forgetful? Perhaps you need to consult a
physician specializing in geriatrics.


Ummm... didn't I say "say it a couple of dozen times"? So far, you've just
been typing it. g

So Hillary didn't really tell that fairy tale about the immaculately
generated billing records showing up in the library?

Then you'll be willing to answer the question?


Ok. I was being mean to you Dave. You don't need to say it out loud a couple
of dozen times!

I'm pretty sure than no matter what I answer, you're not going to like it,
so here's what was concluded on the subject. Feel free to believe that
Hillary lied.

http://www.answers.com/topic/hillary...-controversies

Whitewater
The Whitewater controversy was a series of events and actions that had its
origins in 1978. While in Arkansas, the Clintons were partners with Jim and
Susan McDougal in a real estate venture known as the Whitewater Development
Corporation. According to reports, the Clintons lost their financial
investment in the Whitewater business projects. At the time the McDougals
operated a savings and loan that retained Hillary Clinton's legal services
at Rose Law Firm. When the McDougals' savings and loan failed in 1994,
federal investigators subpoenaed Clinton's legal billing records for
auditing purposes. Hillary Clinton claimed to be unable to produce these
records. After an extensive, two-year search, the records were found in the
first lady's book room in the White House and delivered to investigators in
1996. The delayed appearance of the billing records sparked intense interest
and another investigation about how they surfaced and where they had been;
Clinton attributed the problem to disorganization that resulted from her
move from the Arkansas Governor's Mansion to the White House as well as the
effects of a White House renovation. [LH p. 331] After the discovery of the
records, on January 26, 1996, Clinton made history by becoming the first
First Lady to testify before a grand jury. [22]

The Whitewater investigation was initiated by Independent Counsel Robert
Fiske appointed by Attorney General Janet Reno. The case was later taken
over by Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr, and concluded by Independent
Counsel Robert Ray. Several other allegations were also investigated under
the Whitewater umbrella. The investigations, which took place during Bill
Clinton's presidency and cost an estimated $40 million, resulted in the
McDougals being jailed and Webster Hubbell pleading guilty to felony charges
of lying to federal investigators about Clinton's role in both Whitewater
and the savings and loan failure. No criminal charges were brought against
the Clintons themselves, as Robert Ray's final report on September 20, 2000
stated that there was insufficient evidence that either of them had engaged
in criminal wrongdoing. [23]




--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com