Who are you gonna listen to?
 

"Maxprop" wrote in message
hlink.net...

"Capt. JG" wrote in message

Or, god forbid, he's actually being honest unlike Cheney who wasn't born
with that ability.

Who was just preaching about the politics of hatred in another thread??

Max



No idea... you?

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

Who are you gonna listen to?
 

"Maxprop" wrote in message
link.net...

"Capt. JG" wrote in message

Guess you didn't hear Bill say that he didn't need yet another tax break.
I don't hear Cheney saying that.

Cheney does--his investments earn him millions annually.
Bill doesn't--he doesn't work, and his investments are more in line with
Whitewater.

Max



Please show me where Cheney has said he doesn't deserve a tax break.

Oh, the old Whitewater thing... why don't you claim a Vince Foster
conspiracy again. I'm sure that'll get you some traction with the right-wing
nuts.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

Who are you gonna listen to?
 

Dave wrote:
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 22:50:43 -0800, "Capt. JG" said:


Oh, the old Whitewater thing... why don't you claim a Vince Foster
conspiracy again.


Hillary's fairy tale about the immaculate generation of the missing billing
records in the WH library is a much better story.

Maybe you can find some scientific backing for the notion.

What I want to know is why did Martha Stewart have to serve time and
Hillary didn't for the same sort of thing?

Who are you gonna listen to?
 

Maxprop wrote:
"katy" wrote in message
...


..I'm gonna jump on the Ralph Nader bandwagon...


Too bad. I was hoping only Democrats would do that.

Max


It was a joke....

Who are you gonna listen to?
 

Maxprop wrote:
"katy" wrote in message
...


as much as I would like to see a woman in the WHite House, as President
and not as bed wench, Hillary just deosn't do it for me


Ellen Macarthur for President !!!

(Too bad "she's" not a woman.)

Max



You been eating eyedrops or something?

Who are you gonna listen to?
 

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 22:47:16 -0800, "Capt. JG"
said:

He
did actually win the election.

Hey Jon, to borrow another page from the liberal catechism, it's time to
move on.

LOL


Moreon.org? :-)

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

Who are you gonna listen to?
 

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 22:50:43 -0800, "Capt. JG"
said:

Oh, the old Whitewater thing... why don't you claim a Vince Foster
conspiracy again.

Hillary's fairy tale about the immaculate generation of the missing
billing
records in the WH library is a much better story.

Maybe you can find some scientific backing for the notion.


Doubtful. It's all fantasy land for Karl (Actung) Rove and his minions.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

Who are you gonna listen to?
 

Capt. JG wrote:
"Maxprop" wrote in message
link.net...

"Capt. JG" wrote in message


I wish it weren't, but I'm living in the real world.

The real world of make-believe science.

Max




Sure Max. Unlike your "real world" of religious belief and right-wing
certitude. I'm sure if you keep saying Bush is right over and over, it's got
to be true.

Do you really read Max's posts? He has decried Bush on more than one
occasion. And is far from the religious rught wing Conservative you make
him out to be....

Who are you gonna listen to?
 

"katy" wrote in message
...
Dave wrote:
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 22:50:43 -0800, "Capt. JG"
said:


Oh, the old Whitewater thing... why don't you claim a Vince Foster
conspiracy again.


Hillary's fairy tale about the immaculate generation of the missing
billing
records in the WH library is a much better story.

Maybe you can find some scientific backing for the notion.

What I want to know is why did Martha Stewart have to serve time and
Hillary didn't for the same sort of thing?


Lying to the Federal Trade Commission?? Insider trading? Defrauding
investors? Get real. I'm sure if you say it enough, it'll be true.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

Who are you gonna listen to?
 

Capt. JG wrote:
"Maxprop" wrote in message
link.net...

"Capt. JG" wrote in message


So far, I haven't seen much in the way of facts from you.

(This from the guy who's been supporting his arguments with statements
like "science says it is so.")


You'll listen to big business, but not to scientists. Maybe you think
smoking doesn't cause cancer?

I listen to both sides. You don't. My only contention is that when some
scientists support the notion of GW, and others dispute it, the issue is
far from conclusive. You, of course, contend that any scientist who
disputes the notion of GW must be in the hip pockets of big business.
That is the hallmark of a closed mind.

Max




Really... you listen to both sides. So, what does science, real science from
scientists, actually say about GW? I contend that there are always a couple
of wackos who are unconvinced by the preponderance of evidence. What do you
believe in? So far, I have yet to see you cite any actual facts on the
subject.


YYou haven't got it yet...scince can look at thuings short term and draw
conclusions and science can lok at overall picutres and applyn the short
term and draw a conclusion. Your science is short-sighted...