"Captain Hook" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 2 Feb 2007 16:48:27 -0800, "Capt. JG"
wrote:

"sailirc" wrote in message
news:xmQwh.149$MH2.83@trnddc03...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=COyb9FcpggU

--
NH_/)_
www.sailirc.net




The problem is really much greater variability in weather, not just warmer
weather or a few more inches of rain.

No the problem is YOU talking out of your ass and changing the weather
of this group.

Of course, there are always people who
deny the truth even when it's looking them in the face.

Great self-recognition skills you have Jonathan.
Told many good lies to innocent folk's ISP's lately?

You expect truth from a left-winger?

JB

On 2 Feb 2007 12:29:19 -0800, "Joe" wrote:

On Feb 2, 1:31 pm, Jeff wrote:
Joe wrote:
On Feb 2, 11:34 am, Martin Baxter wrote:
Joe wrote:

The hurricane expert who stood up to UN junk science
The Deniers -- Part III
Lawrence Solomon, Financial Post
Published: Friday, February 02, 2007
December 8, 2006
You're quoting from a Canadian organization (Energy Probe Research
Foundation)?

One or two "scientists" say that Global warming is entirely attributable
too natural causes, 5000 others say man is making a significant
contribution, and which do you go with?

Cheers
Marty

I'm just tryiong to figure how to make more money off your fears.
like all the other global warming warriors.

You know more about hurricanes then the most honored hurricane
researcher in the Atlantic basin?

So, are you claiming that Dr. Landsea is denying global warming?-


No..I just posted his opinion that the global warming folks are using
hurricanes as the "global warming poster child."
It's a scare tactic, and the Hurricane expert says they are bald face
liar's. You should read the posting again.

I trust Dr. Landsea's opinion on Hurricanes more than some Yourapeein
pack of liars.

http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/conten.../291/5504/566a

News of the Week
CLIMATE CHANGE:
It's Official: Humans Are Behind Most of Global Warming
Richard A. Kerr

The United Nations-sponsored Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
officially declared early this week that "most of the observed warming
over the last 50 years is likely to have been due to the increase in
greenhouse gas concentrations." The panel was vaguer than ever,
though, about how bad things could get by the end of the century. At a
minimum, the world will warm more than twice as much in the coming
century as it did in the past one, the panel concluded, but it could
warm 10 times as much.

Bet you nor the quack don't live in Florida!

On Fri, 2 Feb 2007 11:33:06 -0500, "Ellen MacArthur"
wrote:


"Joe" wrote

You're a respected scientist, one of the best in your field. So
respected, in fact, that when the United Nations decided to study the
relationship between hurricanes and global warming for the largest
scientific endeavour in its history -- its International Panel on
Climate Change -- it called upon you and your expertise.
a largish snip

The trouble with global warming is nobody knows. And if somebody knew,
there's nothing they could do about it anyway. It's just a way to sell books,
magazines, movies, and television shows. There's so many really really dumb
people around like Nora who actually believe it when people say you global
warming's responsible for making big blocks of ice falling outta the sky.
When so many people are so dumb they can't figure out how stupid it is
to say global warming's making ice fall outta the sky then it's pretty pitiful.
Mind-numbed robots.....

Katrina's real name

http://www.boston.com/news/weather/a...l_name?mode=PF

By Ross Gelbspan | August 30, 2005

THE HURRICANE that struck Louisiana yesterday was nicknamed Katrina by
the National Weather Service. Its real name is global warming.

When the year began with a two-foot snowfall in Los Angeles, the cause
was global warming.

When 124-mile-an-hour winds shut down nuclear plants in Scandinavia
and cut power to hundreds of thousands of people in Ireland and the
United Kingdom, the driver was global warming.

When a severe drought in the Midwest dropped water levels in the
Missouri River to their lowest on record earlier this summer, the
reason was global warming.

In July, when the worst drought on record triggered wildfires in Spain
and Portugal and left water levels in France at their lowest in 30
years, the explanation was global warming.

When a lethal heat wave in Arizona kept temperatures above 110 degrees
and killed more than 20 people in one week, the culprit was global
warming.

And when the Indian city of Bombay (Mumbai) received 37 inches of rain
in one day -- killing 1,000 people and disrupting the lives of 20
million others -- the villain was global warming.

As the atmosphere warms, it generates longer droughts, more-intense
downpours, more-frequent heat waves, and more-severe storms.

Although Katrina began as a relatively small hurricane that glanced
off south Florida, it was supercharged with extraordinary intensity by
the relatively blistering sea surface temperatures in the Gulf of
Mexico.

The consequences are as heartbreaking as they are terrifying.

Unfortunately, very few people in America know the real name of
Hurricane Katrina because the coal and oil industries have spent
millions of dollars to keep the public in doubt about the issue.

The reason is simple: To allow the climate to stabilize requires
humanity to cut its use of coal and oil by 70 percent. That, of
course, threatens the survival of one of the largest commercial
enterprises in history.

In 1995, public utility hearings in Minnesota found that the coal
industry had paid more than $1 million to four scientists who were
public dissenters on global warming. And ExxonMobil has spent more
than $13 million since 1998 on an anti-global warming public relations
and lobbying campaign.

In 2000, big oil and big coal scored their biggest electoral victory
yet when President George W. Bush was elected president -- and
subsequently took suggestions from the industry for his climate and
energy policies.

As the pace of climate change accelerates, many researchers fear we
have already entered a period of irreversible runaway climate change.

Against this background, the ignorance of the American public about
global warming stands out as an indictment of the US media.

When the US press has bothered to cover the subject of global warming,
it has focused almost exclusively on its political and diplomatic
aspects and not on what the warming is doing to our agriculture, water
supplies, plant and animal life, public health, and weather.

For years, the fossil fuel industry has lobbied the media to accord
the same weight to a handful of global warming skeptics that it
accords the findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
-- more than 2,000 scientists from 100 countries reporting to the
United Nations.

Today, with the science having become even more robust -- and the
impacts as visible as the megastorm that covered much of the Gulf of
Mexico -- the press bears a share of the guilt for our self-induced
destruction with the oil and coal industries.

As a Bostonian, I am afraid that the coming winter will -- like last
winter -- be unusually short and devastatingly severe. At the
beginning of 2005, a deadly ice storm knocked out power to thousands
of people in New England and dropped a record-setting 42.2 inches of
snow on Boston.

The conventional name of the month was January. Its real name is
global warming.