Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ive read a few accounts, mainly from around 1900, of people using oil to
calm the seas. In detail, the oil was usually some sort of fish oil, or oil from a seal or such and was put into a hessian bag or similar filled with rags. The 'oil bag' was then tied to the vessel and thrown overboard. Ive only ever read of it being done while hove to. Has anyone ever seen or heard of this being done in modern times? I really cant understand the logic behind it or see what it would to so calm seas.... any enlightenment welcomed ;-) Shaun |
#2
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Shaun Van Poecke" wrote in message
... Ive read a few accounts, mainly from around 1900, of people using oil to calm the seas. In detail, the oil was usually some sort of fish oil, or oil from a seal or such and was put into a hessian bag or similar filled with rags. The 'oil bag' was then tied to the vessel and thrown overboard. Ive only ever read of it being done while hove to. Has anyone ever seen or heard of this being done in modern times? I really cant understand the logic behind it or see what it would to so calm seas.... any enlightenment welcomed ;-) Shaun If you try it don't forget your MARPOL sticker... and the oil placard.... http://www.uscg.mil/d1/staff/oan/nav...Protection.PDF OIL POLLUTION COMPLIANCE WITH THE FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION ACT The Federal Water Pollution Act prohibits discharges of harmful quantities of oil into U. S. navigable waters or adjoining shorelines. Further, the person in charge of a vessel or facility that discharges oil in violation of the Act is required to notify the Coast Guard's National Response Center at (800) 424-8802 as soon as he or she has knowledge of the spill. The penalty for illegal discharges is a civil penalty of up to $125,000 against the owner, operator, or person in charge of the source. Failure to notify the Coast Guard of a discharge is punishable by a criminal penalty of fines or up to 5 years imprisonment or both, against the person in charge of the source. The owner or operator of the source of a discharge is also liable for all removal costs, as well as claims of loss or injury by third parties. Harmful quantities of oil have been defined by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as those that violate applicable water quality standards or cause a film or sheen on the surface of the water, or cause a sludge or emulsion to be deposited beneath the surface of the water or on adjoining shorelines. Discharge of oil placards must be at least 5" x 8" and fixed in a conspicuous place in each machinery space, or at the bilge and ballast pump control station. Placards must be printed in the language or languages understood by the crew. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
#3
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Shaun Van Poecke wrote:
Ive read a few accounts, mainly from around 1900, of people using oil to calm the seas. Nah, people used oil up through the '60s. In fact one of the eary trans-Atlantic singlehand racers wrote of asking a freighter to pump some oil for him in a storm. In detail, the oil was usually some sort of fish oil, or oil from a seal or such and was put into a hessian bag or similar filled with rags. The 'oil bag' was then tied to the vessel and thrown overboard. Ive only ever read of it being done while hove to. Sure, because the oil slick is going to blow slowly to leeward. It will only help if you are in the slick... or better yet, slightly to leeward of it. Has anyone ever seen or heard of this being done in modern times? I really cant understand the logic behind it or see what it would to so calm seas.... any enlightenment welcomed ;-) THe effect of "calming the seas" isn't so much making waves smaller as keeping the tops of the waves from forming breakers. Higher surface tension, lower wind friction, resulting in wave peaks that stay put instead of rolling. Might not sound like much if you've never been in a storm with rollers, but it does make a big difference. Personally I would not like cleaning the oil off the boat afterwards, but I guess that beats the alternative. -signed- Injun Ear (formerly known as Eagle Eye) |
#4
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sure, it works. Captain Hazelwood swears by it.
SBV "Shaun Van Poecke" wrote in message ... Ive read a few accounts, mainly from around 1900, of people using oil to calm the seas. In detail, the oil was usually some sort of fish oil, or oil from a seal or such and was put into a hessian bag or similar filled with rags. The 'oil bag' was then tied to the vessel and thrown overboard. Ive only ever read of it being done while hove to. Has anyone ever seen or heard of this being done in modern times? I really cant understand the logic behind it or see what it would to so calm seas.... any enlightenment welcomed ;-) Shaun |
#6
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scotty wrote:
Sure, it works. Captain Hazelwood swears by it. Yeah, but he tried to use oil to calm the rocks, not the seas. IE |
#7
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Shaun Van Poecke" wrote Ive read a few accounts, mainly from around 1900, of people using oil to calm the seas. Has anyone ever seen or heard of this being done in modern times? I really cant understand the logic behind it or see what it would to so calm seas.... any enlightenment welcomed ;-) They made it illegal in the United States. You can't have even a sheen on the water without violating some law. That being said, it doesn't work anyway. It's an old salt urban legend. You can see for yourself it doesn't work. Next time it's really windy and there's a lot of fetch and there are giant seas built up put some oil out. Plain old diesel fuel works just fine. You'll see all it does is remove the small ripples and feathering on the surface. It does nothing to reduce the overall size of the waves. It's a local surface effect only. It's just another example showing people don't think things out for themselves. They'd rather listen to stuff that makes no sense at all. Duh! Cheers, Ellen Cheers, Ellen |
#8
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 4 Jan 2007 11:24:19 -0500, Ellen MacArthur wrote
(in article ews.net): "Shaun Van Poecke" wrote Ive read a few accounts, mainly from around 1900, of people using oil to calm the seas. Has anyone ever seen or heard of this being done in modern times? I really cant understand the logic behind it or see what it would to so calm seas.... any enlightenment welcomed ;-) They made it illegal in the United States. You can't have even a sheen on the water without violating some law. That being said, it doesn't work anyway. It's an old salt urban legend. You can see for yourself it doesn't work. Next time it's really windy and there's a lot of fetch and there are giant seas built up put some oil out. Plain old diesel fuel works just fine. You'll see all it does is remove the small ripples and feathering on the surface. It does nothing to reduce the overall size of the waves. It's a local surface effect only. It's just another example showing people don't think things out for themselves. They'd rather listen to stuff that makes no sense at all. Duh! Cheers, Ellen Cheers, Ellen Actually it does work. We are not talking about pouring oil over the side by the gallon either. When I fished commercially there where times, because we were at sea for weeks at a time, that we ended up in adverse weather. Although this is not something that was done to intentionally stop waves from breaking there was that occasional bilge letting that would give the same result. The boat adrift generally outpaced the slick and we would observe a noticeable difference of a lack of peaks inside the slick. The other times I have observed the same effect where as a kid working on my dads boat and chumming with ground up bunkers for bluefish. The fish oil was always nice and smooth regardless of the surrounding areas. -- Mundo, The Captain who is a bully and an ass |
#9
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mundo" wrote Actually it does work. Your wrong. It doesn't work to calm the seas. What's the definition of "Seas"? They are large waves. Oil can do nothing about calming large waves. Oil only calms the surface of large waves. The large wave under the surface remains the same. Oil reduces spray from the wind is all. Duh! Use your head you bully and an ass.... Cheers, Ellen |
#10
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 4 Jan 2007 17:12:04 -0500, Ellen MacArthur wrote
(in article ews.net): "Mundo" wrote Actually it does work. Your wrong. It doesn't work to calm the seas. What's the definition of "Seas"? They are large waves. Oil can do nothing about calming large waves. Oil only calms the surface of large waves. The large wave under the surface remains the same. Oil reduces spray from the wind is all. Duh! Use your head you bully and an ass.... Cheers, Ellen When actually working under those conditions you will appreciate the lack of spray from the cresting waves. There are those that teach and those that do. I suggest you start doing and stop teaching. You might learn somethin' mam' -- Mundo, The Captain who is a bully and an ass |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Calm Weather on the LIS | ASA | |||
Longest Dead Calm (or Becalmed) Sailing Experience? | Cruising | |||
36 foot waves forecasted for Florida western panhandle | General | |||
Hi Seas question | Cruising | |||
NYTimes: Upstairs, Downstairs on the High Seas | Crew |