DSK wrote:
katysails wrote:

Yippeee!! A new toy to try out! Looks good, Doug.


Thanks. You're signing on for the trial voyage, right? I already have
the oars.

If I had more time, I'd complete a sailing rig for it, but I'm losing my
work shop next week.

DSK

You betcha....I'm game...

Martin Baxter wrote:
Looking good Doug,

Thank you!

... how many horses do you suppose you could hang on the
transom, I want to go water-skiing!


Hmm, the bouyancy calculation went up to 650 lbs... that
means it should easily hold one of JimC's 70hp outboards...

DSK

"DSK" wrote
| Only if you have extremely poor eyesight.

My eyes are probably better than yours.
Those two pictures aren't the best to tell much of anything. Maybe basic shape.
It's all splotchy and dull. It's shaped like a Dyer but maybe no chine there. But it's
hard to see if there's a chine because the pictures are dull or the hull is dull and
splotchy. So gimme a break, please....

Cheers,
Ellen

"katy" wrote
| You betcha....I'm game...


Skunk or Otter?

Cheers,
Ellen

Without the Mac I suppose... in that case it isn't a sailboat.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"DSK" wrote in message
...
Martin Baxter wrote:
Looking good Doug,

Thank you!

... how many horses do you suppose you could hang on the
transom, I want to go water-skiing!


Hmm, the bouyancy calculation went up to 650 lbs... that means it should
easily hold one of JimC's 70hp outboards...

DSK

| Only if you have extremely poor eyesight.

Ellen MacArthur wrote:
My eyes are probably better than yours.

Maybe, maybe not. Let me know what your eyeglass
prescription is when you get to be my age.


Those two pictures aren't the best to tell much of anything.

They do if you know what to look for.

... Maybe basic shape.

Which is one of the most important things about a boat, no?

It's all splotchy and dull.

Correct. But then, it's not finished yet. Besides, that's
only on the surface. Superficial, you know?

It's shaped like a Dyer but maybe no chine there.

Good! My boat does not have a chine. This is an important
observation.

... But it's
hard to see if there's a chine because the pictures are dull or the hull is dull and
splotchy. So gimme a break, please....


Give you break? You make remarks without observing first,
and then demand respect for your uninformed opinions? I *am*
giving you a break, I am helping you learn better.

DSK

DSK wrote:

Martin Baxter wrote:
? Looking good Doug,

Thank you!

? ... how many horses do you suppose you could hang on the
? transom, I want to go water-skiing!
?

Hmm, the bouyancy calculation went up to 650 lbs... that
means it should easily hold one of JimC's 70hp outboards...

That ought to do it, probably sail better with a bedsheet, broomstick
and canoe paddles for leeboards than Jim's too!

Cheers
Marty

Hmm, the bouyancy calculation went up to 650 lbs... that
means it should easily hold one of JimC's 70hp outboards...


Martin Baxter wrote:
That ought to do it, probably sail better with a bedsheet, broomstick
and canoe paddles for leeboards than Jim's too!


Of course, but I wasn't going to gloat.

DSK

"DSK" wrote
| Give you break? You make remarks without observing first,
| and then demand respect for your uninformed opinions? I *am*
| giving you a break, I am helping you learn better.


Your being snotty! :-o~

Cheers,
Ellen

Ellen MacArthur wrote:
Your being snotty! :-o~


Not at all. I am holding you to a somewhat higher standard.
Builds character.

DSK