Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#19
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ellen,
Isolated anecdotes don't constitute evidence or statistics. - And that's what I asked for - not anecdotes. There are thousands of Macs still sailing in all kinds of waters all over the world, and the great majority of reports from Mac owners are that they are happy with their boats and would buy another one. Regarding the particular quote, it has been reported that the steering problem mentioned in that cite was a problem experienced in some early 26X models that has since been corrected. (The current model is the Mac 26M). Of course, the Mac isn't the only boat in which some owners have experienced problems over time. Re the comments of the particular technician, negative comments by mechanics about what they are working on, or about work done by others, are pretty common in my experience. Actually, if you read through the notes in the search you cited, most of the Mac owners quoted IN YOUR OWN SEARCH say that they are happy with their boats and haven't had any major problems. - See those quoted below for example. Again, anecdotes aren't the same thing as evidence, and they don't say much about the typical experience of the thousands of Mac owners. - Even less significant are the sarcastic remarks and second-hand hearsay comments from owners of other boats who have little or no experience with the Macs, much less having sailed the current model. Jim Ellen MacArthur wrote: "JimC" wrote | Do you have any statistics or evidence to support your claim that the | Macs are built "flimsy", Ellen? - Or are you just going to say that you | don't have to provide any evidence because "Everybody knows....." Or | that you don't have any evidence of multiple Mac failures, but you | would just feel more comforatable if they were built heavier and had | standing rigging like a 40-ft Valiant, ODay, Tartan, etc. The facts are | that the Macs are light boats, and, accordingly, their rigging is light. | Obviously, it's not the same as rigging needed for a larger, heavier | boat. Also, the Macs are not sold as boats suitable for blue water | crossings. All you have to do is Google it. You'll find lots of things that say flimsy! Here's one: http://groups.google.com/group/rec.b...79239908e0a744 "Actually two different things were failing simultaneously. The cheap steering helm "warped". This would appear to be due to the fact that it is designed for small power boats, and is NOT designed to handle the stress of feedback from rudders. This did not, of course, happen instantly, but when it finally died it did it big time. This problem can be remedied by replacing the stock helm with a good steel one, available from a number of marine supply houses. You have to replace both the helm and the cable. The mechanic who did the installation for me could not believe that Macgregor had used such inadequate hardware. The second problem related to having non-stainless mounting hardware that corroded. A side item that we discovered later is that one of the rudder brackets was cracking. There are numerous other problems relating to the whole arrangement, including an inabliltiy to get an adequate range of motion from the engine. The system needs a complete redesign. " - - This, again is merely an anecdotal report about one boat. - What Mac was this, how old was it, and what percentage of Macs purchased in the past ten years have had this problem? If it was an early year 26X model, the steering linkage was changed long ago. - - " We've owned both a 26 and a 26X. I disagree with your comment about the 26 sailing better than the 26X. I've sailed the 26X on Lake Superior for the last 3 years, not only is it quicker under sail but it is much more stable. As for the outboard, we run a Yamaha 15hp, which works well. The guys that run the 50HP can sure go fast, but you can't put enough fuel on the boat to make the engine useable for any type of cruising. Ventures and Macgragors are built "less-expensively" but are pretty well engineered. Remember a lighter boat imposes less strain on it's structure and rig; furthermore there are literally dozens of thousands of them that have been happily sailing for years." - This is what I was saying. -- " I don't own one myself, but two of my best sailing friends have the older Mac 26 and get a lot of enjoyable sailing and cruising out of them. But they just don't have any "snob appeal"....." "We've loved both of the Mac's we've owned, definitely a great sailing, AFFORDABLE boat. As for the snob appeal, I'd rather have none than have to worry about a $1000 boat payment every month." "Flimsy to me implies not strong enough for the intended purpose and/or likely to fall apart quickly. Neither is true of the 26X--like other Macs,the 26X aren't experiencing structural failures. I expect the 26Xs willstill be out on the water offending the purists 20 or 25 years from now just like the old Ventures." ------------------ (Again, a few comments taken from your own search.) |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Ping Thom. | ASA | |||
Sail Ho! | General | |||
Sail boats that don't sail... | General | |||
Fall Sail on the Chesapeake Bay | ASA | |||
Removing Adhesive from Sail Numbers on sail | General |