Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Martin Baxter" wrote in message ... Maxprop wrote: It's practically the rule rather than the exception. The United Way has such a deplorable pass-through rate (that amount that makes it to the targeted end-users) as to be a joke. At times it's been less than 10%. Perhaps this just a US problem, http://www1.unitedway.ca/sites/Porta...orm.aspx?ID=20 , Or did you you just make up that 10% figure? First: The Canadian rule that 80% must be spent on the target charities does not take into account the amount of money those individual charities extract before funding the endpoint users. Second: This is the USA, not Canada, and we have no such law that I'm aware of. Rather we have, at times, had Congressional oversight on charitable giving and expenses. This sometimes results in improvements in the pass-through rate, but when Congress' back is turned the old ways likely resume. Last figures I saw on the United Way is that about 70% of their monies are passed through to individual charities, but only about 70% of those monies are passed through to the endpoints. That makes the United Way ultimately about 50% efficient. I suspect your United Way is somewhat more efficient in the ultimate pass-through rate. Third: The 10% figure was accurate for the mid to late Seventies. Thanks to a Congressional investigation in the early 80s, the situation has improved. Fourth: Why would I make something like that up? Max |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
It's good news week! | ASA | |||
Good news coming to a fuel dock near you? | General | |||
Good news for America is bad news for the Democrats | ASA | |||
More bad news for Bush, good news for Americans | General |