wrote:
Charlie Morgan wrote:
On Fri, 1 Sep 2006 18:17:09 -0700, "Capt. JG" wrote:

It isn't. Posted from google not aol. Looks like from RR in Virginia.
Um, AOL stopped providing a usenet server for it's customers quite a while ago.
When that happened, Bobsprit started posting from Google. This could still be a
forgery, of course, but it wouldn't be that simple to prove.

It's pretty silly on his part, because he could switch to newsguy for $80 a year
and get everything he has now, plus better usenet. He's paying something like
$25 a month for a ****ty ISP and no news servers. He knows my email address and
I would be glad to help him transition. He could even keep his old AOL email
address for awhile for $5 a month until he feels comfortable with letting go.

CWM

I lose nothing by giving this the benefit of doubt and assuming it is
true until shown to be untrue. If true, then the person needs some
sympathy in spite of past disagreements, if untrue, then it can be used
against him in the future. So, the right thing to do is offer sympathy.

You poor, naive person. I'll light a candle for you.

Yup... well, who cares anyway.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 1 Sep 2006 18:17:09 -0700, "Capt. JG"
said:

It isn't. Posted from google not aol. Looks like from RR in Virginia.

Methinks you're wrong, Jon. It's posted from BS's IP address:
24.90.242.171.

"Dave" wrote

While I am only an ambulance chaser,
I gotta say that if the story were true,
posting your version of the facts publicly before talking
to you insurer's
lawyer was a major mistake.


Good advice!

"Capt" Rob said:
Now....what did I do wrong?


Dave wrote:
While I hate ambulance chasers, I gotta say that if the story were true,
posting your version of the facts publicly before talking to you insurer's
lawyer was a major mistake. Prejudicing the insurer's defense might well be
a basis for disclaiming insurance coverage on a pretty big liability claim.

Since it's a Bobsprit post, we can assume that no facts were
harmed or threatened in the production of it. But that's a
good point about going public with the story.

DSK

A very good point... thanks Dave. I knew we kept you around for a reason.
:-)

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"DSK" wrote in message
.. .
"Capt" Rob said:
Now....what did I do wrong?


Dave wrote:
While I hate ambulance chasers, I gotta say that if the story were true,
posting your version of the facts publicly before talking to you
insurer's
lawyer was a major mistake. Prejudicing the insurer's defense might well
be
a basis for disclaiming insurance coverage on a pretty big liability
claim.

Since it's a Bobsprit post, we can assume that no facts were harmed or
threatened in the production of it. But that's a good point about going
public with the story.

DSK

Remind me again, why we keep you around, Jon.

Scotty

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
A very good point... thanks Dave. I knew we kept you
around for a reason.
:-)

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"DSK" wrote in message
.. .
"Capt" Rob said:
Now....what did I do wrong?


Dave wrote:
While I hate ambulance chasers, I gotta say that if the
story were true,
posting your version of the facts publicly before
talking to you
insurer's
lawyer was a major mistake. Prejudicing the insurer's
defense might well
be
a basis for disclaiming insurance coverage on a pretty
big liability
claim.

Since it's a Bobsprit post, we can assume that no facts
were harmed or
threatened in the production of it. But that's a good
point about going
public with the story.

DSK

Scotty wrote:
Remind me again, why we keep you around, Jon.

Scotty

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
A very good point... thanks Dave. I knew we kept you
around for a reason.
:-)

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"DSK" wrote in message
.. .
"Capt" Rob said:
Now....what did I do wrong?
Dave wrote:
While I hate ambulance chasers, I gotta say that if the
story were true,
posting your version of the facts publicly before
talking to you
insurer's
lawyer was a major mistake. Prejudicing the insurer's
defense might well
be
a basis for disclaiming insurance coverage on a pretty
big liability
claim.
Since it's a Bobsprit post, we can assume that no facts
were harmed or
threatened in the production of it. But that's a good
point about going
public with the story.

DSK




Because he's a nice guy, just like you are, Scotty.

Dashing good looks, smart, and of course, I'm a liberal. :-)

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Scotty" wrote in message
. ..
Remind me again, why we keep you around, Jon.

Scotty

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
A very good point... thanks Dave. I knew we kept you
around for a reason.
:-)

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"DSK" wrote in message
.. .
"Capt" Rob said:
Now....what did I do wrong?


Dave wrote:
While I hate ambulance chasers, I gotta say that if the
story were true,
posting your version of the facts publicly before
talking to you
insurer's
lawyer was a major mistake. Prejudicing the insurer's
defense might well
be
a basis for disclaiming insurance coverage on a pretty
big liability
claim.

Since it's a Bobsprit post, we can assume that no facts
were harmed or
threatened in the production of it. But that's a good
point about going
public with the story.

DSK

Gee... thanks!

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"katy" wrote in message
...
Scotty wrote:
Remind me again, why we keep you around, Jon.

Scotty

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
A very good point... thanks Dave. I knew we kept you
around for a reason.
:-)

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"DSK" wrote in message
.. .
"Capt" Rob said:
Now....what did I do wrong?
Dave wrote:
While I hate ambulance chasers, I gotta say that if the
story were true,
posting your version of the facts publicly before
talking to you
insurer's
lawyer was a major mistake. Prejudicing the insurer's
defense might well
be
a basis for disclaiming insurance coverage on a pretty
big liability
claim.
Since it's a Bobsprit post, we can assume that no facts
were harmed or
threatened in the production of it. But that's a good
point about going
public with the story.

DSK




Because he's a nice guy, just like you are, Scotty.

"katy" wrote in message
...
Scotty wrote:
Remind me again, why we keep you around, Jon.

Scotty

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
A very good point... thanks Dave. I knew we kept you
around for a reason.
:-)

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"DSK" wrote in message
.. .
"Capt" Rob said:
Now....what did I do wrong?
Dave wrote:
While I hate ambulance chasers, I gotta say that if
the
story were true,
posting your version of the facts publicly before
talking to you
insurer's
lawyer was a major mistake. Prejudicing the insurer's
defense might well
be
a basis for disclaiming insurance coverage on a
pretty
big liability
claim.
Since it's a Bobsprit post, we can assume that no
facts
were harmed or
threatened in the production of it. But that's a good
point about going
public with the story.

DSK




Because he's a nice guy, just like you are, Scotty.

God help him.