http://www.mrc.org/SpecialReports/20.../sum101405.asp

TV's Bad News Brigade
ABC, CBS and NBC's Defeatist Coverage of the War in Iraq


Ever since the United States and an international coalition
toppled Saddam Hussein's dictatorship in the spring of 2003, the Iraq
war has dominated network newscasts. Since then, there's been a lot
of undeniably bad news, as terrorists have launched a savage campaign
to thwart efforts to establish democracy in a major Arab state. But are
network reporters giving the public an inordinately gloomy portrait of
the situation, as some critics charge? Are the positive accomplishments
of U.S. soldiers and Iraq's new democratic leaders being lost in a
news agenda dominated by assassinations, car bombings and casualty
reports?

The answer to both questions is: Yes.

This conclusion is based on a Media Research Center study of
broadcast network news coverage of the Iraq war so far this year. MRC
analysts reviewed all 1,388 Iraq stories broadcast on ABC's World
News Tonight, the CBS Evening News and NBC Nightly News from January 1
through September 30. (In 2006, the MRC will release a similar analysis
of cable news coverage of Iraq.) Among the key findings:

¦ Network coverage has been overwhelmingly pessimistic. More than
half of all stories (848, or 61%) focused on negative topics or
presented a pessimistic analysis of the situation, four times as many
as featured U.S. or Iraqi achievements or offered an optimistic
assessment (just 211 stories, or 15%).

¦ News about the war has grown increasingly negative. In January and
February, about a fifth of all network stories (21%) struck a hopeful
note, while just over half presented a negative slant on the situation.
By August and September, positive stories had fallen to a measly seven
percent and the percentage of bad news stories swelled to 73 percent of
all Iraq news, a ten-to-one disparity.

¦ Terrorist attacks are the centerpiece of TV's war news. Two out
of every five network evening news stories (564) featured car bombings,
assassinations, kidnappings or other attacks launched by the terrorists
against the Iraqi people or coalition forces, more than any other
topic.

¦ Even coverage of the Iraqi political process has been negative.
More stories (124) focused on shortcomings in Iraq's political
process - the danger of bloodshed during the January elections,
political infighting among politicians, and fears that the new Iraqi
constitution might spur more civil strife - than found optimism in
the Iraqi people's historic march to democracy (92 stories).
One-third of those optimistic stories (32) appeared on just two nights
- January 30 and 31, just after Iraq's first successful elections.

¦ Few stories focused on the heroism or generous actions of American
soldiers. Just eight stories were devoted to recounting episodes of
heroism or valor by U.S. troops, and another nine stories featured
instances when soldiers reached out to help the Iraqi people. In
contrast, 79 stories focused on allegations of combat mistakes or
outright misconduct on the part of U.S. military personnel.

¦ It's not as if there was no "good news" to report. NBC's
cameras found a bullish stock market and a hiring boom in Baghdad's
business district, ABC showcased the coalition's successful effort to
bring peace to a Baghdad thoroughfare once branded "Death Street,"
and CBS documented how the one-time battleground of Sadr City is now
quiet and citizens are beginning to benefit from improved public
services. Stories describing U.S. and Iraqi achievements provided
essential context to the discouraging drumbeat of daily news, but were
unfortunately just a small sliver of TV's Iraq news.

It is probably predictable that journalists would emphasize bad
news, but network TV's profoundly pessimistic coverage has
shortchanged the accomplishments of both the U.S. military and Iraq's
new leaders and has certainly contributed to the public's growing
discontent with the war. Just as it would be wrong for reporters to
conceal any bad news, it is wrong for journalists to downplay the good
news that is being made in Iraq. Reporters have the responsibility to
fully inform citizens about progress that is being made amid great
sacrifice, and they are not doing so.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Another example of how the leftist in this country are embolding and
supporting the terrorist by trying to promote a defeatist attitude in
this country all for the sake of trashing a President.


Chris

On 13 Dec 2005 15:00:41 -0800, "Mule" wrote:

http://www.mrc.org/SpecialReports/20.../sum101405.asp

TV's Bad News Brigade
ABC, CBS and NBC's Defeatist Coverage of the War in Iraq


Ever since the United States and an international coalition
toppled Saddam Hussein's dictatorship in the spring of 2003, the Iraq
war has dominated network newscasts. Since then, there's been a lot
of undeniably bad news, as terrorists have launched a savage campaign
to thwart efforts to establish democracy in a major Arab state. But are
network reporters giving the public an inordinately gloomy portrait of
the situation, as some critics charge? Are the positive accomplishments
of U.S. soldiers and Iraq's new democratic leaders being lost in a
news agenda dominated by assassinations, car bombings and casualty
reports?

The answer to both questions is: Yes.

This conclusion is based on a Media Research Center study of
broadcast network news coverage of the Iraq war so far this year. MRC
analysts reviewed all 1,388 Iraq stories broadcast on ABC's World
News Tonight, the CBS Evening News and NBC Nightly News from January 1
through September 30. (In 2006, the MRC will release a similar analysis
of cable news coverage of Iraq.) Among the key findings:

¦ Network coverage has been overwhelmingly pessimistic. More than
half of all stories (848, or 61%) focused on negative topics or
presented a pessimistic analysis of the situation, four times as many
as featured U.S. or Iraqi achievements or offered an optimistic
assessment (just 211 stories, or 15%).

¦ News about the war has grown increasingly negative. In January and
February, about a fifth of all network stories (21%) struck a hopeful
note, while just over half presented a negative slant on the situation.
By August and September, positive stories had fallen to a measly seven
percent and the percentage of bad news stories swelled to 73 percent of
all Iraq news, a ten-to-one disparity.

¦ Terrorist attacks are the centerpiece of TV's war news. Two out
of every five network evening news stories (564) featured car bombings,
assassinations, kidnappings or other attacks launched by the terrorists
against the Iraqi people or coalition forces, more than any other
topic.

¦ Even coverage of the Iraqi political process has been negative.
More stories (124) focused on shortcomings in Iraq's political
process - the danger of bloodshed during the January elections,
political infighting among politicians, and fears that the new Iraqi
constitution might spur more civil strife - than found optimism in
the Iraqi people's historic march to democracy (92 stories).
One-third of those optimistic stories (32) appeared on just two nights
- January 30 and 31, just after Iraq's first successful elections.

¦ Few stories focused on the heroism or generous actions of American
soldiers. Just eight stories were devoted to recounting episodes of
heroism or valor by U.S. troops, and another nine stories featured
instances when soldiers reached out to help the Iraqi people. In
contrast, 79 stories focused on allegations of combat mistakes or
outright misconduct on the part of U.S. military personnel.

¦ It's not as if there was no "good news" to report. NBC's
cameras found a bullish stock market and a hiring boom in Baghdad's
business district, ABC showcased the coalition's successful effort to
bring peace to a Baghdad thoroughfare once branded "Death Street,"
and CBS documented how the one-time battleground of Sadr City is now
quiet and citizens are beginning to benefit from improved public
services. Stories describing U.S. and Iraqi achievements provided
essential context to the discouraging drumbeat of daily news, but were
unfortunately just a small sliver of TV's Iraq news.

It is probably predictable that journalists would emphasize bad
news, but network TV's profoundly pessimistic coverage has
shortchanged the accomplishments of both the U.S. military and Iraq's
new leaders and has certainly contributed to the public's growing
discontent with the war. Just as it would be wrong for reporters to
conceal any bad news, it is wrong for journalists to downplay the good
news that is being made in Iraq. Reporters have the responsibility to
fully inform citizens about progress that is being made amid great
sacrifice, and they are not doing so.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Another example of how the leftist in this country are embolding and
supporting the terrorist by trying to promote a defeatist attitude in
this country all for the sake of trashing a President.


Chris

I'm sure we'll see this study covered on the evening news very soon!

:)
--
John Herring

Hope your Christmas is Spectacular!
....and your New Year even Better!