Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Capt. Rob" wrote in message ups.com... the Sony W5 has great reviews. The S500 seems too new for reviews? Casio is too expensive. I have to stay under $200. That's what my monthly boat payments were before it got repo'ed. Scotty, you can get the Casio Z120 from places like J&R for 219.00 and cheaper if you hunt around. The Casio Z60 is also around the same price at Circuit City. The Z120 may be better for you because it'll take standard AA batteries...way cheaper to use. The Z60 is nice in black.... http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/cont...e?O=cart&A=det ails&Q=&sku=424559&is=REG CC has the black Z60 for $206, w/ 1GB memory card. The only question is the battery. You think the Z60 is better than a Sony W7 or W 5? SBV |
#2
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() You think the Z60 is better than a Sony W7 or W 5? The W5 and W7 are two of the Sony units I know have poor focusing when the light is not bright. If you only intend on using them outdoors, then they would be fine. I also take issue with Sony stuff at times because it can break...seems more delicate than some other brands. Sounds silly, but you can look up the W5 on Amazon and read the customer reviews. Some time ago I remember too many people agreeing the focus was a weak point. Some of this is operator error of course. But I tried a W5 and got blurry shots as well because it could not lock focus indoors very well. The Sony L1 was far better. Your expectations are what's important here. RB |
#3
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What do you think of the little Fuji A500. The A600 doesn't
have a viewfinder and I'd prefer one. Scotty "Capt. Rob" wrote in message oups.com.. .. You think the Z60 is better than a Sony W7 or W 5? The W5 and W7 are two of the Sony units I know have poor focusing when the light is not bright. If you only intend on using them outdoors, then they would be fine. I also take issue with Sony stuff at times because it can break...seems more delicate than some other brands. Sounds silly, but you can look up the W5 on Amazon and read the customer reviews. Some time ago I remember too many people agreeing the focus was a weak point. Some of this is operator error of course. But I tried a W5 and got blurry shots as well because it could not lock focus indoors very well. The Sony L1 was far better. Your expectations are what's important here. RB |
#4
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Fuji Finepix S7000 kicks ass on the Nikon D70!
"Scotty" wrote in message ... What do you think of the little Fuji A500. The A600 doesn't have a viewfinder and I'd prefer one. Scotty "Capt. Rob" wrote in message oups.com.. . You think the Z60 is better than a Sony W7 or W 5? The W5 and W7 are two of the Sony units I know have poor focusing when the light is not bright. If you only intend on using them outdoors, then they would be fine. I also take issue with Sony stuff at times because it can break...seems more delicate than some other brands. Sounds silly, but you can look up the W5 on Amazon and read the customer reviews. Some time ago I remember too many people agreeing the focus was a weak point. Some of this is operator error of course. But I tried a W5 and got blurry shots as well because it could not lock focus indoors very well. The Sony L1 was far better. Your expectations are what's important here. RB |
#5
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() The Fuji Finepix S7000 kicks ass on the Nikon D70! This was an odd failure from Fuji. Poor low light focus and no AF assist lamp. Sharpness at 12MP CCD res. is poor and there is quite a bit of barrel distortion. With a sensor half the size of a D70 it's not likely to kick any ass and barely measures up to my new Casio. Crantz, sensor size and is more important than MP count. Only the ignorant worries about MP counts. The 4 MP Nikon D2Hs blows away my D70 in every way, even though my D70 has 6.1 MP. In fact, quite a few people feel the D2Hs beats the D200 which has 10.2 MP. Go google up a storm, but you don't own any good cameras. RB 35s5 NY |
#6
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Capt. Rob" wrote in message oups.com... The Fuji Finepix S7000 kicks ass on the Nikon D70! This was an odd failure from Fuji. Poor low light focus and no AF assist lamp. Have you experienced this yourself? Sharpness at 12MP CCD res. is poor and there is quite a bit of barrel distortion. It doesn't have a 12 MP CCD. With a sensor half the size of a D70 it's not likely to kick any ass and barely measures up to my new Casio. Crantz, sensor size and is more important than MP count. No it's not. Increasing the space between charge cells on the CCD increases the grain of the picture. You can't refute that! You forgot to mention bits per pixel. How does that affect the phhoto quality? Only the ignorant worries about MP counts. The 4 MP Nikon D2Hs blows away my D70 in every way, even though my D70 has 6.1 MP. How many bits per pixel on each camera? Go google up a storm, but you don't own any good cameras. I don't even own a camera! The Fuji S7000 focal plane array is far superior to any Nikon FPA. It's the features and compression algorithms that make the S7000 fall short. But you knew that, right? So all you really know about cameras is what the sales brochures say. You can't refute that either! Bwahahahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!! |
#7
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() It doesn't have a 12 MP CCD. Not native, but it does have 12mp output. Look it up. With a sensor half the size of a D70 it's not likely to kick any ass and barely measures up to my new Casio. Crantz, sensor size and is more important than MP count. No it's not. Increasing the space between charge cells on the CCD increases the grain of the picture. You can't refute that! Wrong. There is no increased space because the cells are larger. Larger sensors make for less noise which is why no small sensor can match Canon FF 35mm sensors for ISO performance. You forgot to mention bits per pixel. How does that affect the phhoto quality? It effects, but so does inherent pixel sharpness AA filters and the optical set. The Fuji is not a good camera, Bob. The Fuji 30 is. How many bits per pixel on each camera? Google it up yourself. I use these cameras. I don't even own a camera! Clearly. It's the features and compression algorithms that make the S7000 fall short. No, it's the optics that kill it, like any fixed lens camera. It suffers from distortion, CA and poor control over DOF like all P&S cameras. And you DID not know that because you didn't google enough. So all you really know about cameras is what the sales brochures say. You can't refute that either! Bob, give it up, dude. You just proved beyond any doubt that you have no clue. You have no idea of real world performance because you don't own any of these cameras. And yes, I did get to use the 7000 and recently the 9000, which is FAR better. Niether could touch the cheapest DSLRs out there. Your troll ends here. RB 35s5 NY |
#8
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Capt. Rob" wrote in message oups.com... Crantz, sensor size and is more important than MP count. Nikon says otherwise: http://www.microscopyu.com/tutorials...tor/index.html You know nothing about the actual physics of a camera! You prove that with every post! Go read some more sales brochures! Fool! |
#9
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() What do you think of the little Fuji A500. The A600 doesn't have a viewfinder and I'd prefer one. Scotty, Fuji makes some great cameras, but the A500 is not one of them. It suffers from poor focus and shutter lag. What's odd to me is that Fuji is all about no shutter lag, good focus and ISO range on higher end models, but it has yet to trickle down. The new F30 is an amazing P&S from Fuji. Have you also looked at KEH.com? They sell used gear in like new condition. For example, they have a Pentax Optio S50 for 119 bucks. Optio 555 for 179.00 and so on. Keh.com is a great company and backs what they sell. RB 35s5 NY |
#10
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Capt. Rob" wrote in message ups.com... What do you think of the little Fuji A500. The A600 doesn't have a viewfinder and I'd prefer one. Scotty, Fuji makes some great cameras, but the A500 is not one of them. It suffers from poor focus and shutter lag. What's odd to me is that Fuji is all about no shutter lag, good focus and ISO range on higher end models, but it has yet to trickle down. The new F30 is an amazing P&S from Fuji. Have you also looked at KEH.com? They sell used gear in like new condition. For example, they have a Pentax Optio S50 for 119 bucks. Optio 555 for 179.00 and so on. Keh.com is a great company and backs what they sell. No, I'll check them out tonight. Have you ever dealt with 'PrestigeCamera'? They have the Z120 at $166. I checked some reviews on them, over 1000 negatives! Apparently the place is a real rip-off. Scotty |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Sailing Boom Brake - Vangs - Sail shapes +more links | Cruising | |||
Ping Thom. | ASA | |||
Sail Ho! | General | |||
Fall Sail on the Chesapeake Bay | ASA | |||
Removing Adhesive from Sail Numbers on sail | General |