Either one of you was playing dog in the manger, or neither of you was smart
enough to read between the other's lines.


Is it necessary to "read between the lines" when one person
is so childish & insulting?


Martin Baxter wrote:
Read what you like into it Dave, the bottom line is that I won't be
bothered to converse with someone whose' first recourse is crude ad
hominems, I believe you have said substantially the same on occasion.

I wondered if anybody else spotted the irony here.

.... I
rather enjoy rattling Booby's chain from time to time, but when he gets
so upset that he has to resort to name calling, the fun goes out of the
game.


It just means that you won.

DSK